After upgrading from 6.49.10 only 9 of 50 openVPNs (over 443 TCP) are coming up. I don't know why, after every restart other 9 connections are active. The only fixed thing is the counter 9...

Niels

I *cannot* confirm that ... everything working just fine here with v7.10 as openvpn-client on several (about 30) boxes of different models. And overal, ovpn-client seems pretty stable now, after the v7.8 nightmare has ended. I can't confirm this. After upgrading no OpenVPN is coming up on my Router...

Hi.

I've managed to get OpenVPN running. But you need to use OpenVPN version 2.5.8. Newer versions will give a TLS Handshake error.

How can I downgrade OpenVPN? I did an upgrade to 6.48.8 and no OpenVPN is coming up

Niels

Thanks for your answer. I wrote it a little bit wrong. I haven’t a real SBC, it‘s only a a small appliance of my phone system and not really save enough to connect it directly to the internet. At the moment it is and it’s hard working on defending all attacks. Remote worker are connected via WebRTC ...

I have a SIP-trunk without registration. So I must forward Port 5060 from external to my SBC. Right now it’s simple open, the goal is to reduce this to providers IP. This is done by a Destination-NAT. Service-Port SIP is activated, but unfortunately no SIP-package will be manipulated. I can checked ...

Thanks a lot - disabling Fasttrack was the solution.

Niels

I found out a strange bahavior. If I start torch to see what traffic is actual on the device, the bandwith-limitation of the queue is working until I switch off torch. I don't understand this
I guess, that this is not problem of the NAT, a routed connection showes the same beahvior.

Niels

Hello together, I use a hEX PoE as NAT-Gateway between 2 Networks. At eth1 is the IP 172.16.0.219/24 , at eth2 172.20.31.44/24. Over eth2 is the network 192.168.0.0/24 with a http(s)-Server reachable, at eth1 is a service at TCP-Port 712 reachable. A acess form networks behind eth2 to service 172.16...

I use RouterBoards for remote support to oure customers. To have only minimal dependencies on the local internet-access I use OpenVPN via Port 443. So, I have now my company-Net (for example 172.16.0.0/24), my OpenVPN-Nets (for examle in the range 100.64.124.0/24) and my customer-nets (for exemple 1...

We use Routers as double-NAT-Gateways to enable services between networks without routing. For this we have 2 interfaces with srcnat and some rules for the services with dstnat. This works perfekt. Now whe have some LDAP services which are not supporting TLS. On the other side we have clients which ...

Is this possible? I like to use it for a sevice access. So when I push the buttom I like tu torn on Wifi and turn it off by pushing the butom again. If I Forget to deactivate Wifi it will be perfect if it's switching of next night automatically.

Niels