It is necessary for complex traffic routing and QoS same time. Just imagine, you need to track traffic routes and QoS marks and you have just one connection mark. If I could copy route and QoS information from connection mark it is cut off tons of silly rules, without that I have to compare one conn...

Yes, please!

Hello everyone. It would great to have split DNS features. That is common practice in an enterprise, to redirect DNS request for own domain from internal network to local DNS server, and passthrough other requests to a global DNS server. Workaround with DNAT DNS request with layer7 haven't enough fl...

Hello everyone. It would great to have route marking on connection level. Internally RoS acting as Linux and have marks for connections and packets. But in RoS only packet mark divided by two bitfields, one represents for us as "route-mark" and the second one as "packet-mark" and...

Hello everyone. I think it would great to have dynamic user-defined rules. It is useful for API manipulation, especial for external connection tracking. For example: Complex QoS with Asterisk, which can set DCSP mark on their packets, but then traffic came from the outside perimeter of our network w...

Hello everyone!
I think it would be great to have up/down script events on Interface (e.g. GRE, WiFi, caps), like it did on PPP Interface. And it would great, add some events trigger to ipsec subsystem.
Thank you!

When I import the first certificate, everything goes fine, but when importing subsequent certificates, they overwrite it.
Sorry for my language.