Setneuf I have a even stranger problem, the modem connects to my operator (NOS in Portugal), everything works fine, BUT! I have no Internet connection, the Mtik while doing a ping it shows the status TIMEOUT, I can see the TX working but no RX. Plug a SIM card from another operator and boom, everyt...
I have a even stranger problem, the modem connects to my operator (NOS in Portugal), everything works fine, BUT! I have no Internet connection, the Mtik while doing a ping it shows the status TIMEOUT, I can see the TX working but no RX. Plug a SIM card from another operator and boom, everything is o...
Hello guys, I've noticed something, since version 6.41.4 the hotspot seems not to be working very well with some mobile phones, namely Huawei smartphones. I've tried almost every version since 6.41.4 and the problem continues, the mobile phones cannot detect that they are behind a hotspot and the &q...
But that is for sure a limitation from the usb modem, not the mtik, if you can configure the usb to work as a bridge (that I doubt it in LTE modems) the passthrough will let you configure the ppp-client in the mtik itself (having the 25mb top).. Sorry, but what exactly you mean it is a limitation f...
The only work around that i see that can be used is implementing a metarouter to create a nat inside for the network and a nat outside for the "hotspot" network, and applying a hellish set of firewall rules...
But that is for sure a limitation from the usb modem, not the mtik, if you can configure the usb to work as a bridge (that I doubt it in LTE modems) the passthrough will let you configure the ppp-client in the mtik itself (having the 25mb top)..
Can you please raise the 65535 character limit (double it or remove it completely), so that the error case "max line length 65535 exceeded!" is resolved? It happens both with GET and POST (I understand that could occur with GET, but it shouldn't with POST) As routerOS is more and more inv...
it is possible do using the passthrough option: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/LTE#Passthrough Why it is not possible when using RB951G with Huawei E3372 modem? We tested and it worked - the passthrough client got the 192.168.8.100 IP address. This IP address NOT is passthrough fro...
@Setneuf: Your RSRP is very low. -100 dBm is "low". Move your antenna's (and the modem) to the place as high as possible in the house (your UTP cable can go up to 100 meters without degradation of signal or speed). I know that, but the point was that at the same spot an RB+ USB Huawei LTE...
Has the enclosure a IP (Ingress Protection) rating certificate? Or Nema certificate? I don't know if any of MT's device have IP or NEMA certificate or they "just" weatherproof. But this device is made for outdoor usage, mounted on a pole or wall - outside. just buy an umbrella ... :lol: I...
I only see a problem there, how are you gonna make that waterproof? If you do what i did, that's waterproofed, since the antenna connector is INSIDE (waterproofed by the cover) and RF cable goes inside within the factory-made hole. Ok, I undestood, you're going to use extensions connected to the &q...
1) no such way is "disable the right antenna" 2) you cannot mount antenna (rp sma connector) onto that box. Maybe onto left side - but i'm not sure, that you can place them so near without hitting the card or heatsink. I still would say: bring the RF out on the right of powerjack - and us...
At the moment wlan1 is disabled, latest rc (6.41rc47) is installed. Cover removed, patch antennas off the box. Best i could get is 45mbps downlink and 40mbps uplink. As seen in the picture, the antenna connectors are glued onto card wap_lte_front.jpg There are additional info about wAP LTE by Uldis...
Uldis, if I drill a hole in the wAP case to put an external antenna does that void warranty? :P I'm not Uldis, but i would say, just check my posts above (in this thread) for a photo of the wAP board. On the right side of power jack, there are 2 connector places for rp-sma pigtails, with perforatio...
Can you please raise the 65535 character limit (double it or remove it completely), so that the error case "max line length 65535 exceeded!" is resolved? It happens both with GET and POST (I understand that could occur with GET, but it shouldn't with POST) As routerOS is more and more inv...
Tests with external (~30cm rp-sma 2.4G) antenna attached. If RSRP -75dBm / SINR 21 dB -> max I could get is 90mbps downstream and 41mbps upstream (shown by interface traffic, speedtest shows slightly less - what is normal) If RSRP is ~80dBm / SINR 19 dB -> 70mbps downstream and about 30mbps upstrea...
All we can do is wait for a "fix", if it has anything to do with the firmware, otherwise my plans for this device are doomed :( SXT-LTE has different bands that your providers using? I think, i would use them, where they are working - and use wAP where it's a must. Maybe i will give a try...
Where are you from wpeople? I'm from Portugal, all the LTE bands used in here are supposedly compatible, one thing that I noticed is that most of the times my upload is bigger than my download, it also happens to you? I'm from Hungary. We have 3 providers here (T-mobile, Telenor, Vodafone). I can t...
At the moment wlan1 is disabled, latest rc (6.41rc47) is installed. Cover removed, patch antennas off the box. Best i could get is 45mbps downlink and 40mbps uplink. As seen in the picture, the antenna connectors are glued onto card wap_lte_front.jpg There are additional info about wAP LTE by Uldis...
Here is the speedtest from a local cellular provider also running on Band3. Signal readings: earfcn: 1300 (band 3, bandwidth 20Mhz, cqi 13) rsrp: -76dBm rsrq: -10dB sinr: 20dB It could be related to the signal as your RSRP is very low. You could try to adjust the board location to get a better sign...
Can you do one test for me?Meassure the speed as normal, than try disabling onboard WIFI and repeat the test again over lan. Do you see any noticeable difference? Dont have unit anymore to test for my self Yes, i would do. But it needs to connect again. Sadly if i do changes on LTE interface (like ...
Here is the speedtest from a local cellular provider also running on Band3. Signal readings: earfcn: 1300 (band 3, bandwidth 20Mhz, cqi 13) rsrp: -76dBm rsrq: -10dB sinr: 20dB It could be related to the signal as your RSRP is very low. You could try to adjust the board location to get a better sign...
Here are the results, attention that this SIM card down/up is locked to 30Mbps/3Mbps by the carrier (NOS aka Orange Portugal) RB+Huawei LTE E3276s-150 USB: usb_ppp info.PNG test1_usb.PNG test2_usb.PNG test3_usb.PNG test4_usb.PNG wAP LTE Kit: wap_lte_info.PNG test1_wap_lte.PNG test2_wap_lte.PNG test3...
what speed you are getting from the wap lte and from the usb modem? What LTE category your USB modem supports? Try to compare which band each unit uses as maybe the wap lte connected to different bands or cell tower. The usb Modem is a Huawei E3276s-150 with the following specs: 4G LTE Band 1/3/7/8...
Hello guys, it's just me or the new wap lte have serious issues regarding 4g speed? In the same spot my 4g huawey usb stick connected to an rb951 has way more internet speed than the wap lte. This is not normal, the wap antennas are huge compared with the ones on the usb stick and even so the speed ...