Thanks , this afternoon i will try whit 2 cards ( Next and DWL 520 ) , if i the link was no good , will trie whit flats panel , or in the worst case i will use a bridge whit and external antenna.

Thanks for everyone

Hi,

I want to use cards because the clients are soo close to the tower , and the installation in the client home will be more " clear ", only put the card in the pc and is running, so no cables, no holes in the wall or anything else.

Thanks

I have a RB133c whit the 2.9.35 version and a Atheros 5413 as AP I have a lot of problems whit this version when the wireless clients tried to connect, " excesive data loss ". When I upgrade to 2.9.41 the things go better whit the connections , but the problem is that the Scan , the Freq. ...

Thanks, yes is too close.

But i ask because some cards maybe have some problems working whit MT

I use APs usually but in this case i need cards and have nio experience whit this.

Thanks
Bye

MSI PC54G3 MSI PC60G Encore ENLWI-G Edimax EW7128G Noganet TWL-542P TP Link WN 650G I have to select one of this cards to use in the clients PCs. The distance is 300 - 500 meters from the omni I have a RB whit a senao 400 mw and and omni antena in a big tower. Which card is better ? Anyone know this...

Add one IP 83.69.35.x on your LOCAL Interface and use it as Default Gateway for yours LANs PCs whit IP 83.69.35.x

Excuse my english

Bye

Hello:

Get the OIDs of a rules that you want and use SNMP and MRTG.

Nos Vemos

WAP 11.

I only used in a test, I don't use LinkSys, I hate it , but in a backbone works better than the Senao.

I'm in Argentina , and its and old access point.

I thing that´s a Senao Problem.

Configuracion 5

Client---MT---LinkSys Bridge----LinkSysBridge------MT(NAT)----Internet

= client can connect to internet, everything is okay

Bye

That´s happend whit Senaos cards too ?

I have the same problem whit a similar configuration. Clients----MT----Senao Bridge----Senao Bridge----MT (NAT)---Internet I lost the NAT when the Senao table was fully (one MAC many IPs) I put one of the Senao in AP and the other in Bridge everithing goes well, but the speed of the link is lowest. ...

Did the MikroTik have a Null Interface like Cisco Routers ? or somenthing like this, to could drop the packets quickly ??? SeeYou :wink: Por si alguno entiende español......... Tiene el Mikrotik alguna Interfaz Null como los routers Cisco ? o algo parecido para poder dropear los paquetes rapido ? No...

The problem was in the MTU of the interface

The MTU was in 1480 and I couln't connect the MSN Messenger but if I put it in 1500 the Messenger goes fine

Then I put the LAN interface in 1480 and the WAN in 1500

It's all rigth ??? or I have to set booth interfaces in 1480 ?????

Thanks

Hello, I have a problem whit Meessenger and i'm going crazy I'am probing 2 MT one as gateway of the other and this giving access to my clients Internet ------- MT Gateway------- MT Access ------- Client Provider--------Nat-W.Proxy-------Queue-PPPoE------IP-PPPoE If i use a fixed IP everithing works ...