MikroTik

ccl13

I'm running several routers with RSTP, but for me the current "stable version" is 7.12.1 So I am not running 7.14 on any production device.... only in test environments where there is no bridge. So maybe try installing 7.12.1 and remain on that version for some time (until the many new bu...

ccl13

So to update on this, I am inclining to believe there's something wrong with the 7.14's RSTP implementation. Once I have switch connection events, I see a lot of log items regarding looped packets and conflict ARP, and causes switches to be blocked for a long period of time. Again, none of these mak...

ccl13

Did you set (or have set by the defaults) the admin-mac of the bridge to the MAC of the first ethernet port in that bridge? Can you send the entire /export for interface, bridge and bridge ports? There must be some dup MAC Is there no other router in the network running from a backup of a different...

ccl13

Yes this device is restored using backup from another device. Is this something bad? And how to fix? Yes, that is bad! Reset the device to defaults and configure it again. You can use /export and paste it to the router, but you can NOT restore a backup from another device! Hi all, @pe1chl, I have r...

ccl13

Yes this device is restored using backup from another device. Is this something bad? And how to fix? Yes, that is bad! Reset the device to defaults and configure it again. You can use /export and paste it to the router, but you can NOT restore a backup from another device! Sadly that could be a bit...

ccl13

Did you maybe load a backup file from a different device? Otherwise, show the config of your bridges. Did you set the admin MAC address and is it the same as the ethernet MAC address of a port (of the CCR2004 itself) in the bridge? Hi pe1chl, thanks for reply! Yes this device is restored using back...

ccl13

Hi All, Not sure if this is a known issue, but after I've upgraded to 7.14, my CCR2004 becomes intermittently connecting and generating below error messages: 03-12 23:58:24 interface,warning ether10: bridge RX looped packet - MAC 18:fd:74:e9:9c:04 -> 00:0d:5d:10:12:a6 VID 1 ETHERTYPE 0x0806 ... 03-1...

ccl13

Run into issues after upgraded to 7.14 from 7.13.4. The network is not working. WinBox shows all 0 for all interfaces. Switches on the network are all flipping RSTP and it was quite hard to see what actually is happening. Because I need the network working, I downgraded to 7.13.5 and it works fine n...

ccl13

This is the first post on Google when searching for Mikrotik's Cloudflare DDNS solutions, and I got my script's original version here from OP. So adding my version here: # Script name (must be same as you called the script) :local scriptname "<YOUR_SCRIPT_NAME>" :if ([:len [/system script ...

ccl13

This post helped me a lot. To add my bit for whoever comes later, this is what I did to made it work. My OS is Windows 10 x64 22H2. Here's the preparation work: - Use compatibility setting to make netinstall run in Windows 7 Compatibility Mode and run with Administrator Permissions. - Disable all ot...

ccl13

Hi Community, I've recently got a new CCR2004-16G-2S+, which comes with USB port. However from within WinBox I cannot find the USB port. Under `/syste routerboard usb` there's nothing, and `/port` does not show anything too. How can I make this port to work? My goal is to make the port to drive a US...

ccl13

Hi All, I recently found that my network is having a rather weird issue, that I cannot access `www.myq.com`, or to be precise `204.183.221.47` or `50.224.141.47`. I get connection timeout from both. I've already isolated ISP issue, that when I connect to Internet directly using my laptop's ethernet ...

ccl13

FWIW (and not sure I'm talking about the same thing you guys are), I bought one of these back in January(?) and it works connected to my 2.5Gbps Moto MB6811 cable modem with no flaps or issues: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FXBFZP8 (it says "Please note that our 10GBase-T SFP+ to RJ45 M...

ccl13

hi
7.3beta34 has been fixed
You can try

Thanks for the update! I will grab a RB5009 and give it a try.

ccl13

Just to update here in case it's needed but using a FS.com DAC and a Brocade ICX6450-48P switch I'm getting a nice 10gbps link with my RB5009, no dropped packets on ROS 7.2 . If there's anything you need me to help test let me know Thanks for the info. I do have switches working fine with RB5009 bu...

ccl13

I tried this one. You can look at port statistics, it drops a few packet every a few tens of minutes to a few hours. In most cases user does not feel this though. You mean Tx/Rx Drops from the rb5009 sfp+ port stats? Mine are both 0s. On xs1930 side, port status does not have Tx/Rx Drops, but Error...

ccl13

I tried the same and found that not all SFP+ RJ45 adapter works; and while some of them work, they are never stable that they disconnects quite randomly every a few hours. I am using the one from 10Gtek (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KFBFL16). It has been stable for two days and counting. I tried th...

ccl13

OK. I ended up with using a SFP+ RJ45 on rb5009 and connecting a ethernet cable to xs1930's RJ45. It is no ideal but works. I tried the same and found that not all SFP+ RJ45 adapter works; and while some of them work, they are never stable that they disconnects quite randomly every a few hours. hi....

ccl13

Not sure if this is anybody's concern still. A bit of new development. I've got a new switch, Zyxel XS1930-12HP. And this one showed basically the same issue as the MS510TXUP. It just does the cut off a few more cycles instead of just once. I can be sure that the issue is with RB5009UG, not the othe...

ccl13

Hi, Have you ever tried the combination that leave MS510 as default and manually set RB5009 to 10Gbps full duplex and autonegotiation disabled? Yes. I've tried to put both as default, then disabling features / use manual settings instead for everything I can think of. None helped. At this time, I b...

ccl13

Hi All, As a general update, I'm now on version 7.1.1, the issue is still there. Also, I've witnessed something similar but different on RB4011: After a few reboots, there's once that on both RB4011 and Netgear MS510TXUP the link appears to be up but both side is receiving 100% error packets. I've r...

ccl13

I have a 5009, and it's pretty fine with a Dac, a 1G SFP, and a dual speed 10G/1G SFP. (Mostly fs.com bits, generic, cisco and hp profiles used) Sometimes need to fiddle with the auto-negotiation on/off, 1G/10G selection, that's about it. Have suspicion that auto-negotiate might work better recentl...

ccl13

I have same issue, don’t have a stable solution. Just reboot the RB5009 have chance to make it work Thanks for the information. At this moment, I tried to reboot about 10 times but no luck yet. Could you tell me what exactly did you do to make it work? Just so I don't miss some details which could ...

ccl13

Like mentioned in original post, did this, still the same issue. There was/is an issue with some DACs not working on some devices. This might be your issue. My RB5009 and CRS328 are connecting using Cisco SFPs with fibre and both manually set to 10Gbps full duplex and autonegotiation disabled. I un...

ccl13

Turn off Auto Negotiation and set the speed to 1G

I've had to do this on a CRS328 running 6.4x and on an RB5009 running 7.1RC6

Like mentioned in original post, did this, still the same issue.

ccl13

I kind of suspect what you have is same issue as I am having:
viewtopic.php?t=180647

ccl13

I am not too sure if this is hardware issue or software but I suspect software first. The issue is, on my newly bought RB5009 the SFP+ port does not seem to work with anything SFP I have. It appears that whenever something is connected, the port status on RB5009 side is shown as active all the time ...

ccl13

Thank you all for responding to this. For now I seem to have a solution but I cannot explain why the phenomenon is different on 6.48.1. My issue is resolved by adding all interfaces to bridge's VLAN. Recently I configured a bonding for LACP to connect one of my switch to the router (RB4011). After t...

ccl13

You're not going to get any (sensible) reply unless you provide a configuration export. Thanks for your reply! I am not new here. Did not post a config because I have a quite long config so between two things I am doing the easier one that is to diagnose myself looking at the export. If I cannot ge...

ccl13

Hi, I noticed a weird issue that I cannot determine the actual reason after upgrading to 6.48.1. All I can confirm is the issue happens only on 6.48.1 but not 6.48. The issue is related to VLAN. I have several VLAN configured on my network, they are mostly to isolate different kind of network device...

ccl13

One correction to the above - leave pvid at the default of "1" for any bridge ports where they are supposed to be trunk ports to switches, carrying only tagged vlans. Thank you mducharme that's a lot of information to consume. It will take me a while to get that processed through. Meanwhi...

ccl13

So as I could tell, it's either the router or the laptop. I don't exactly think it's the laptop because that would mean either Windows 10 or Intel and Realtek did this wonky thing. I guess I will have to look into VLAN everything? At this point I would do an /export hide-sensitive and paste here, t...

ccl13

The new style bridge VLAN - I thought about this no default VLAN 1 idea a while ago and tried a bit but messed things up. Is there a good article on implementing this on Mikrotik RouterOS? I was not sure how to handle the edge where VLAN eventually has to be converted to untagged to be compatible w...

ccl13

I see what you meant now. This will require a bit more effort and I will try to find some time to conduct this test. Yes I do have DHCPv4 servers on both subnets. I actually thought about this and tried to observe - I could find one or two switches on the network grab a VLAN 59 address but they are...

ccl13

I cannot figure out what leaked the broadcast this time. There's nothing on my network even knows a VLAN 59 except the router itself. Unless you have some device that is just removing all VLAN tags from packets that arrive with a tag. Again, I didn't say to remove VLAN 59 from the switches. I said ...

ccl13

I am aware of the issue with mixed tagged and untagged network. I don't think I have anything like that on my network. However, is there a way for me to diagnose this kind of issue, like to isolate where the issue could happen? What I would do temporarily is disconnect your switches from the router...

ccl13

I am not aware of switches on the network could do bridging between VLAN and untagged. But I do have a bunch of "smart managed" switches on the network. The VLAN 59 is created by configuring ports on one of the switches to untag VLAN 59 and PVID 59. I am not 100% sure but I don't think th...

ccl13

Here it is: That all looks fine too. Please note that "/interface bridge vlan" doesn't do anything without having Bridge VLAN filtering enabled. You are using old-style bridging/VLAN configuration instead of bridge vlan filtering, so that setting has no impact. Is there some other device ...

ccl13

Thanks - as that is what I thought but I don't know what I did wrong. So currently my VLAN is done as a VLAN interface attached on the bridge that includes all my LAN interfaces. Something like this: # NAME MTU ARP VLAN-ID INTERFACE 3 R bridge1-lan-vlan0059 1500 enabled 59 bridge1-lan And then this...

ccl13

I notice that before any setup, the computer on the VLAN can actually get IPv6 configuration. I don't think this is right because I tried to attach IPv6 Address only on my main network interface. And when I try to create one set of configuration for my VLAN, I found that both the main network and V...

ccl13

Hi All, I have being scratching my head for this. Please give help! So here's what's happening: I have an ISP that does not provide IPv6, so I registered a Tunnel Broker that HE.net provides. I followed all the standard configuration guides and even setup a script to automatically update my IP addre...

ccl13

Print detail and google the vendor/device id to get more info. Looks like MT hasn't updated the PCI database yet: [admin@MikroTik] /system resource pci> print detail 0 device="00:05.0" name="unknown (rev: 1)" vendor="unknown" category="Generic system peripheral&qu...

ccl13

That’s the Wireless speed, unsupported at this moment

Oh that's what they are. What I have is the ethernet router model so there's no wireless at all. I guess they will never became something known then.

ccl13

I am just curious when seeing all these: /system resource pci> print # DEVICE VENDOR NAME IRQ 0 00:05.0 unknown unknown (rev: 1) 234 1 00:04.0 unknown unknown (rev: 1) 234 2 00:03.0 unknown unknown (rev: 1) 234 3 00:02.0 unknown unknown (rev: 1) 234 4 00:01.0 unknown unknown (rev: 1) 234 5 00:00.0 u...

ccl13

According to https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:F ... ge_handler I don't think VLAN Filtering is going to disable Fast Path on Bridge, but I did double check everything and on my CCR1009 Bridge Fast Path is disabled when VLAN Filtering is enabled. Does anybody know what's happening?

ccl13

I have v6.42.3 running and I find that if I enable VLAN Filtering on bridge, there won't be no packets processed with Bridge Fast Path (counter shows 0). Is it because VLAN Filtering and Bridge Fast Path are mutually exclusive? If not, what I might be configured wrong here causing this?

ccl13

And approach two - I understand it basically means if I want to separate different VLANs into different bridges, I need to create one bridge to connect all network and create VLAN interface off this bridge? I'm not sure I understand this sentence. Can you draw (a piece of ascii-art or a photo of a ...

ccl13

Have a look here and come back if questions remain. Of course it is relevant for 6.41+. Thank you sindy. I think your approach one is more or less what I am doing now. And approach two - I understand it basically means if I want to separate different VLANs into different bridges, I need to create o...

ccl13

Hi All, I am learning about new bridge capabilities came with RouterOS v6.41 and please help me with this thought. I have multiple VLAN on my network isolating different groups of users. I would like to upgrade my setup to use bridge, but how do I create a bridge for each VLAN? My current setup is t...

ccl13

802.3af/at standard is "active" PoE. It requires negotiation by the devices. Passive PoE is a different, incompatible standard. Mikrotik makes Gigabit Passive PoE injectors you can use if your switch doesn't provide *passive* PoE output. Also, most Mikrotik devices accept PoE input on por...

ccl13

I have one CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+PC and I am trying to get it powered by PoE, at least partially. The specification says it supports passive PoE in 18-57V, which means 802.3af/at with proper setup should work. However I tried many switch / adapter to power the router, none worked as the router never powe...

ccl13

Hi All, Thanks for your interest! Somehow, another reboot fixed this issue. I don't understand why, but it fixed. Due to my environment reboot was not an easy option for me so I tried a lot of other things, but none worked. I did a port scan on every interface and found that none port exposed. Howev...

ccl13

Hi All, I upgraded my RB750Gr3 to v6.41 today. I see there's major change in port configuration, so I did backup. However after upgrade, I see everything works fine except all managerial access. Winbox, SSH, Telnet, all seems to be no longer binding to any port. My questions is, 1) is there any met...

Search found 53 matches