Search found 24 matches
- Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:32 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How to eliminate high ping on Wi-Fi in CAPsMAN?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1147
How to eliminate high ping on Wi-Fi in CAPsMAN?
Good day. Faced a problem, capsman is configured on the router, 4-5 clients (no more) are constantly connected to the cAP point, the load is small, but the delay between the router and wireless clients constantly "jumps" from 20 to 200-300 ms. Is it possible to configure the cap to reduce ...
- Sun Oct 03, 2021 4:48 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IPsec tunnel established but no traffic. [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4988
IPsec tunnel established but no traffic. [SOLVED]
Good day. I am using an intersite IPsec tunnel between ROS, after configuration it worked flawlessly. But! After moving router to a new site, traffic in both directions stopped going through the tunnel, Mikrotik shows 0 packets. At the same time, the tunnel itself works stably. Please help with iden...
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 7:57 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature Request: IPSEC Improvements
- Replies: 167
- Views: 51326
Re: Feature Request: IPSEC Improvements
+1 for VTI
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 12:06 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature Request: IPSEC Improvements
- Replies: 167
- Views: 51326
Re: Feature Request: IPSEC Improvements
yes it should be implemented in the next update !
For version 7?
- Thu Dec 03, 2020 10:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Netinstall doesn't work.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 854
Netinstall doesn't work.
Good day. After upgrading to 6.46.8, the cAP became a brick. I'm trying to restore it with Netinstall by connecting it directly to the computer, but when the reset button is pressed for 15 seconds, the link falls off. On the computer, the message "network cable is not connected." Reflashin...
- Thu Nov 19, 2020 9:12 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IKEv2 Site-to-Site IPSec VPN for Branch Offices. [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 970
Re: IKEv2 Site-to-Site IPSec VPN for Branch Offices. [SOLVED]
Since there is NAT at least at the CHR end, you cannot avoid tunnel mode of the SAs unless the DMZ (as in "1:1 dst-nat") can handle also ESP forwarding. If there is NAT also at at least some of the 4011 ends as your drawing suggests, I'm afraid there is no way to avoid tunnel mode of the ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:07 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IKEv2 Site-to-Site IPSec VPN for Branch Offices. [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 970
IKEv2 Site-to-Site IPSec VPN for Branch Offices. [SOLVED]
Good day to all.
I'm trying to connect several RB4011s from 6.46 to CHR via IPSEC (without tunnels) which is in the DMZ.
Accordingly, the question arises how to configure IPSec modeconf \ NAT for traffic exchange between Internal networks?
I'm trying to connect several RB4011s from 6.46 to CHR via IPSEC (without tunnels) which is in the DMZ.
Accordingly, the question arises how to configure IPSec modeconf \ NAT for traffic exchange between Internal networks?
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:25 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Issues with updating RB951Ui-2nD to 6.46.7/6.47.4
- Replies: 2
- Views: 883
Re: Issues with updating RB951Ui-2nD to 6.46.7/6.47.4
It may be a configuration problem. Save your configuration script then reset to factory defaults and try the update. If it works then you probably have a problem in your configuration. Install your configuration in chunks using terminal till you find a problem then fix it. Good time. It did not hel...
- Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:01 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Issues with updating RB951Ui-2nD to 6.46.7/6.47.4
- Replies: 2
- Views: 883
Issues with updating RB951Ui-2nD to 6.46.7/6.47.4
Good day, everyone. I can't update. Latest working releases 6.46.6 and 6.47. Above, when updating, the connection to the Internet disappears and every 5 seconds the connection to the RoS itself disappears. Resetting the settings does not help; after setting the parameters, the situation repeats. The...
- Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
Thanks to everyone, the issue is resolved.
- Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:23 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
This customer. which can connect, with mandatory encryption. Kopazany at first can not.So there it is...
- Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:16 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
Mrdude go to the active connections tab, double click the connected client and see if the encryption is mentioned there...
- Sun Oct 20, 2019 11:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
Set it to required.its use is indicated in the profile?
- Sun Oct 20, 2019 11:41 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
Yes, without encryption, disconnection occurs.Are you sure your client device connects only if there is encryption?
- Sun Oct 20, 2019 11:35 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
It is obvious. But, how do I find out why encryption is not turned on if its use is indicated in the profile?As i said in my previous post, if the client is configured to only connect if there is encryption, then since you can connect the encyprion is used...
- Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:29 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
R00t is right.. is your client configured to connect only if encryption is used?
Please explain what it means "right"? Its settings indicate the use of encryption.
- Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:16 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
If its activated and you can connect then obviously uses it...
- Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
It is activated, why RB2011 do not use it?Enable to your client to require encryption and see if it connects.. if not, then yes it does not use encryption...
- Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:07 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
Re: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
PPP - Active Conections - Column Encoding is empty when i disable IPsec.But there should be MPPE128 stateless.How can you tell its not encrypted?
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:04 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7392
IN v6.45.6 L2TP not use MPPE 128 ? [SOLVED]
Good day.
In RB2011 in the PPP profile I specify for L2TP I specify the Use Encryption parameter. But the connection is not encrypted, for what reason can this happen?
In RB2011 in the PPP profile I specify for L2TP I specify the Use Encryption parameter. But the connection is not encrypted, for what reason can this happen?
- Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:45 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: L2TP/IPSEC client access through Dual Access PPTP.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 797
L2TP/IPSEC client access through Dual Access PPTP.
Good day to all. I am trying to connect routers 6.43.4 through L2TP / IPSEC. The problem is that the client goes to the network via Dual PPTP and Phase 2 does not pass. How to configure IPSEC settings for connection due to Dual Access PPTP? -----------------------------------------------------------...
- Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:36 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: When configuring SSTP clients on routers of the same model, the default is different Default Route Distance.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 630
When configuring SSTP clients on routers of the same model, the default is different Default Route Distance.
Good day to all. When configuring the client's SSTP on RB2011UA, a Default Route Distance of 0 is set for some of the routers, while for others 1. But all of the routes have a dynamic 0. What is the reason for this strange behavior? https://sun9-7.userapi.com/c824700/v824700003/16cb1e/nr4Hs_D-P7Q.jp...
- Tue May 08, 2018 12:34 pm
- Forum: Virtualization
- Topic: CHR starts periodically to be unavailable through the network interfaces after update to 6.42.1
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4538
CHR starts periodically to be unavailable through the network interfaces after update to 6.42.1
Hello. After 6.42.1 (Current) is installed on the Cloud Hosted Router, the VM starts periodically to be unavailable through the network interfaces, the error is preceded by a message in the dhcp, critical, error :: dhcp-client on WAN lost IP address XX.XX.XX.XX - lease expired. Does anyone know the ...
- Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:35 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Data transfer rate drops to two when using SSTP.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 873
Data transfer rate drops to two when using SSTP.
Hello everybody! I configured the SSTP tunnel, where I use the RtrOS CHR v6.38.5 as a server, and the client RB2011UaS-2HnDB v6.36.3. Both devices have external exchange time between which 70 ms. BUT! When measuring time through VPN-tonel, I get a value 2-3 times more. What can be associated with a ...