MikroTik

nowires

Exactly the same here.

I have disscuss it in

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=28330

It's a thread for RB600 with gigabit ports. Same problems for some people.

nowires

Exactly the same problem here with RB450G. Randomly in time, one port stops to work under load (30Mbps FD link). Maybe it will be related to Gigabit implementation of Mikrotik. PD: in the affected port there are a lot of Rx Errors, more then 14000 in three minutes. PD: I use 3.27 software version an...

nowires

Bonding is o.k. when you have only a small count of links at one location. If you have a high count of links you will have problems with the available spectrum ... Have you read about 802.11n? Exactly the same waste of spectrum bandwidth. I saw a demo of an 11n bridge at Cebit almost a month ago. 9...

nowires

I do really hope..
MT can have support on the 802.11n..

The 11a + turbo also is not sufficient for our deployment already.

Hi. What are your requirements?

I have achieved 70mbps sustained with Turbo A.

nowires

Like I have commented in other thread, RB333 with RouterOS 3.4 gives me 70mbps (Turbo A)

nowires

NStreme must be enabled or disabled on BOTH SIDES to work.

nowires

can you take a second to expand upon what this means exactly so its not mis-interpreted:

70 mbps UDP aggregated bandwidth

Thanks
Scott

send + receive = aggregated

Is the total traffic in both directions

nowires

Ok, this is the config for my last point to point bridge (RB333+R52 on each side). WDS Bridge Conntrack disabled Some packages disabled: ipv6, hotspot, ppp and dhcp 5Ghz Turbo (with -60db signal) NStreme ON, polling ON, Exact size 3200 Perfect 70 mbps UDP aggregated bandwidth. Really I'm very impres...

nowires

Have you tried with Athlon LE-1640?

Athlon is more efficient than Pentium 4 series and for me is the best monocore platform.

nowires

i have tested 411 too as wds bridges.At table with ROS 3.3 i`ve got stable 3 MB/s (24 mbps) with 5Ghz and around 5 Mb/s(40 bmps) one way with nstreme enabled.

Good numbers

But are they with TCP or UDP? Can you try with both directions?

nowires

We want make a point to point wireless bridge between our NOC and a remote data center. Our needings are perfect 12 Mbps Full Duplex with NStreme activated. The new RB411 seems to be a good option, but RouterOS License is only L3. Are wireless bridges supported by L3 license? Is this a good election?

nowires

Where can I find docs about mesh in V3?

nowires

Third time I write about it...

I use mangle to mark packets and assign interface queues for each type of data. But Ares fragmented ip packets surpass queues and exceed the limits.

Does anybody knows a solution?

nowires

From which version you upgraded?
Are you using Nstreme?
Do you see any performance degredation on your router?

I have upgraded from 2.9.50 and I'm not using NStreme.

One WDS station interface and other AP Bridge. No traffic and 50% and higher usage.

nowires

I have upgraded three of my boards to rc14.

In one of these boards the CPU usage is always more than 60%, without traffic. It's very strange.

Can someone give me a help?

nowires

First, you must use x86 version. Second, try with 256MB Kingston CF.

I had many problems with 512+ MB from Trascend in my WRAPs boards.

nowires

I am thinking in create a firewall rule to drop the packets that match the size of this kind of Ares packet. It has a fixed size and I haven't seen before in other software.

But I don't know if it will be the best solution...

nowires

I have the same problem, almost sure caused by Ares customers. But they aren't zero port packets. I captured some packets from one of the hosts, and I could see that there are a lot of lines with IP protocol (fragmented IP). IMO, queue counts the first UDP packet size, but not the fragments. http://...

nowires

Will the Rb532a handle (4) Ubiquiti Super Range 5 cards? I plan on using (4) 90 degree sector antennas for backhaul.

IMO you should use two RB532A with 2 XR5 each one.

nowires

Is only solution is to install 3.0 and l7 ?
MJ

I think that L7 in the only way.

FTP also uses random ports between 1024 and 5000, so if you want to route/mangle all FTP traffic, you need L7.

nowires

I have used Wireshark to capture some packets and discover more about this problem. Here you can see torch, with the address marked with the arrow: http://mt.intecsur.net/torch4.gif And now let's see wireshark: http://mt.intecsur.net/wireshark.gif So I have an answer... and many questions :shock: Do...

nowires

Here we go again: Queues in a bridged AP: http://mt.intecsur.net/queue2.gif Torch: http://mt.intecsur.net/torch2.gif Queues in a routed AP: http://mt.intecsur.net/queue3.gif Torch in user A: http://mt.intecsur.net/torch3a.gif Torch in user B: http://mt.intecsur.net/torch3b.gif Anybody is worried abo...

nowires

I can see 'em! =) Reposting on forum:

Thanks.

P: IMO this is a critical problem...

nowires · Re: Simple queues not working and possible reason 2.9.48 in a RB532A board

2.9.48 in a RB532A board

nowires

This isn't the first time that I have post about this problem. http://mt.intecsur.net/queue.gif Making torch to this user, I can found "ghost" packets, with no source or destination ports defined. These packets seems to be ignored by the queue and makes 100kbps upload rates (no matter the ...

nowires

Have anybody info about the new WiSoC boards?

nowires

I would identify the VoIP traffic by server IP if possible...

In my opinion it's the best way.

nowires

RB532r5 has been tested with some Linksys POE switches

and works?

No way with my Netgear PoE switch.

nowires

I've already read all about the RouterBoard Crossover... While it is a nice idea, it doesn't help me. It is virtually useless outside of its narrow range of capabilities. What about 900MHz clients? What if I want 802.11n? 4.9GHz Public Safety? Forget it. I'm interested in the versatility a modular ...

nowires

I think that the only option is Layer 7 filtering.

nowires

I think that the best CPE product would be an Atheros WiSoC based board. But it is only my opinion.

nowires

Currently I'm using two WANs, with a policy based routing: TCP (and undefined) traffic goes to WAN1 and UDP traffic goes to WAN2. I think that this model is not the best, but it's easy to make the port forwarding, basing destination NAT in the protocol. I want to use the "load balancing with pe...

nowires

I used a P4 3.0Ghz with Clarkconnect, but I have changed the system to RB532A and seems to work great (20% CPU utilization).

Thanks for the answers

nowires

I'm thinking in use a RB532A r5 like core router in one of my network, due the limited space for all my backbone (1,5 m2). The network is as follows: - 12 Mbps WAN - Aproximately 200 users. - 512 kbps DL / 128 kbps UL. - P2P limited, but allowed. The Core router only will make NAT, port forwarding, ...

nowires

I have the same problem with upload in simple queues (latest 2.9 release). Ares reachs more than 100kbps, no matter the max-limit configured. There was some problems with Ares, but since rc5 Ares matching is improved Changelog from 3.0rc5 : *) improved ares/warez p2p protocol matching I believe the...

nowires

When I obtained the license from CMT, the "Ministerio de Industria" send me a letter with the regulations (channels and freqs). Resuming:

802.11b/g: 100mW (20dbm) EIRP
802.11a: 65mW EIRP for 5.4Ghz and 1000mW EIRP for 5.7-5.8Ghz

nowires

I have the same problem with upload in simple queues (latest 2.9 release). Ares reachs more than 100kbps, no matter the max-limit configured.

nowires

Select Japan regulatory domain (available channels 1 to 14)

nowires

I have attached one rule, but there are many clients like this. No matter the queue, they uses at least 100 kbps of upload.

nowires

Chipset like Ralink or Realtek are the best option in noisy enviroments, always based in our test.

Atheros is more flexible, thanks to their HAL capabilities.

nowires

64 bits operations are useless in router enviroments

nowires

500 models at least, doesn't support 802.3af (no matter what MT says).

I adquired a 24 port (12 PoE ports) managed switch to power all the boards of my central backbone, but RB refuses to work with active PoE.

nowires

How can we obtain the software?

nowires

Which node(s) are connected to backhaul ? You still have single point of failure in a few places too.

Oh, I forgot it. The node connected to backhaul is the one between the hills.

Standard bandwidth for clients is 512/128 kbps.

nowires

Has anybody a meshed network working with WDS?

nowires

This is the diagram of the planned infraestructure of my future network, that will replace the actual one. http://www.intecsur.info/wds.jpg Each node have two radios: one for interconnection (5ghz with 12dbi omni antenna) between nodes and one for client service (2.4ghz with 7dbi omni antenna) It's ...

nowires

tx/rx .. as i know tx is the download , rx is the upload .. arent they ? Yes. Simplyfiying, if I want to give 64k/512k (UL/DL) and reduce it to 32k/384k after 60 continued seconds, maybe the rule should be (I ask): (UL/DL) Max-limit: 32k/384k Burst-limit: 64k/512k Burst-threshold: 32k/128k ????? <-...

nowires

I'm trying something similar. Anybody knows how to do it?

Client always obtain the bandwidth reflected in burst limit...

Max limit - 32k/256k
Burst limit - 64k/512k
Burst threshold - 32k/256k
Burst time 60s/60s

Objetive is give 64k/512k for 60 seconds and after reduce it to 32k/256k

nowires

Like you see I'm a complete newbie in routerOS. Before I used IkarusOS, that have a "Stop wireless to wireless traffic" option.

What is the equivalent in routerOS?

nowires

Many thanks for your answer. Very clear and easy to understand

nowires

Previously, I always worked with bridged interfaces, so routing in the same board is something new for me. Suppose I have the next network configuration: Clarkconnect gateway: LAN 192.168.2.253 Mikrotik node #1: ath0: 10.0.1.1 ath1: 10.0.2.1 ath2: 10.0.3.1 ath3: 10.0.4.1 Node is connected to gateway...

Search found 51 matches