+1 for RouterOS v7 BFD support.

It would be great.

If I was you I would give shaping just below 1Gbps a shot and see if you still get the packet loss.

I don't use 1G Ethernet modules in productions so I don't have too much skin in the game, goodluck.

I still have x2 CCR2004's that aren't in production yet so I did some testing on them. The CCR2004's are directly connected to each other via sfp-sfpplus2. I tested with: - 1G Ethernet module - Mikrotik S-RJ01 - 17% packet loss (First attempt) - DIFFERNT 1G Ethernet module & Ethernet cable - Mik...

I would just like to say that I experienced the same issues. I have x4 CCR2004's and when they were in my lab before being shipped to production I had them connected to each other using Mikrotik 1G S-RJ01 Ethernet modules. NSW-RTR-01 (172.16.4.1 - CCR2004) was connected to NSW-RTR-02 (172.16.4.2 - C...

I am also interested in this. I have a CRS305-1G-4S+IN Switch that is running SwOS and it is connected to x2 of my CORE CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS Routers. QinQ frames (S-TAG & C-TAG) come into this Switch and need to be able to be passed onto the Routers (Active/Passive). QinQ is new to me so I figured...

It turns out it was something simple as you were alluding to. Mikrotik do not support /31's (I was under the assumption they did). It turns out I had to configure my sfp-sfpplus3 interface as a /32. This post https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=32935 helped me resolve the gateway not being re...

Thank you for the response, I really appreciate it. I am able to ICMP ping the 103.xxx.xxx.94 gateway fine. I am able to ARP ping the 103.xxx.xxx.94 gateway fine. I am NOT able to MAC Ping the 3C:8A:B0:xx:xx:xx gateway. I am NOT able to MAC ARP ping the 3C:8A:B0:xx:xx:xx gateway. sfp-sfpplus3 is the...

I was looking through the forums and it looks like google had not indexed this one yet https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=165370 . I thought the same as @Hakujou since all of the routes were inserted in the Mikrotik route table I assumed the gateway was reachable... it turns out the...

Hi, I am receiving a Full BGP table from our Upstream IP Transit provider on CCR2004 Router-01 fine. This Router-01 I am receiving the Full BGP table on is an iBGP peer with my other CCR2004 Router-02. The iBGP Router-02 peer is NOT receiving the Full BGP table from Router-01. I want to be able to a...

Further to this, I am more concerned about shaping and queueing the L2 NBN Aggregation interfaces than the PPPoE interfaces. Let's say the L2 NBN Aggregation interfaces are 1Gbps interfaces and I want to shape them to 990Mbps and have a HTB queue on them. Ideally, the L2 NBN Aggregation interfaces a...

Hi, This is my first time posting on the Mikrotik forums, so please be nice. I have only owned Mikrotik CCR2004 Routers for about 1 month now and I must say I have become a massive fanboy of Mikrotik (Cisco & Ubiquiti Routers are what I have most experience with). I picked the Mikrotik Routers o...

We have a requirement for a 1.66km link. Would this be possible? Thanks I have the same question as ntblade. I am setting up a 1.65km link and am wondering if this will be possible with the LHGG-60ad? If it is possible what sort of speeds should I expect (I know it depends on a lot of variables, bu...