MikroTik

digitalinee

Any insight please?

digitalinee

Dear all, This is my setup: /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge-control /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=ether4 ] comment=trunk-vlans-in name=ether04 set [ find default-name=ether12 ] comment="server 10.20.30.151" /interface vlan add interface=ether04 name=vlan-hr1...

digitalinee

It is so bad for this setup to be possible with physical interfaces only. This way i must deal with multiple routers down the way, while with vlans i only need single central one.
Thank you sindy for keeping up with me, i really appreciate all your efforts, i really do and i mean it, thank you again.

digitalinee

The IP addresses are needed in order to communicate via layer 3 between these networks, ether1 (WAN) horizon is 1, ether2 horizon is 2, others are 3, ether2 is for admin for now so he could access all networks. The PPPoE IPs are received from the ISP PPPoE server and they are not concerning me, all ...

digitalinee

Hi Sindy!! Please consider this setup that works perfectly, it uses physical interfaces so it is limited to the number of ports on the router . My requirement is a duplicate setup that uses VLANs instead of physical interfaces. /interface bridge add name=bridge1 /interface bridge port add bridge=bri...

digitalinee

It is my bad that i didn't told you that what i'm asking here is for upgrading the current network, it is not what the actual current network setup is. The current setup is a simple layer 2 switch environment for all clients on default VLANs i didn't even switch them to VLAN 959, and they work just ...

digitalinee

The cisco switch if plugged directly to the isp distribution switch will work okay and provide service as well but it will keep showing notifications every minute in the CLI of native vlan mismatch 959, it will gone if i switchport all the ports to vlan 959.
So does it mean tagged or untagged?

digitalinee

If you connect the Cisco to the cable from the ISP box directly, instead of putting Mikrotik in between, does it work? If i connect a PC directly to the cable from the ISP the PPPoE will work, if i plug the cable into a switch and connect a PC to that switch the PPPoE works, if i separate internal ...

digitalinee

This is the detailed diagram of the setup that i'm looking for.

digitalinee

I have tested the setup directly, but there is no avail so far

digitalinee

This can't be due to HW offloading. That functionality is used for switching (L2 functionality) while OP is routing between VLANs which is L3 functionality and that one can not be offloaded to L2 hardware.

Correct, thank you!

digitalinee

I think (but not sure since I’m still a new learner) this might be happening because of using multi bridge configuration, not sure how many bridges can your router accelerate but on low performance router the hw is on the first bridge, make sure hw=yes on the bridge you want to send data over. Again...

digitalinee

The diagram that i posted earlier is what the setup should look like, i tested the setup via a switch (not router) connected to the ISP as you said in parallel, the reason for this is i didn't want any unnecessary down time for the network. So, i understand from you that i should test it directly to...

digitalinee

The internet connections was terminated when i plugged the router, i had to reboot it to make it run again. I have removed the ether1 from the bridge and still can not establish a PPPoE connection. /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge1 /interface vlan add interface=ether9 name=10.10.10....

digitalinee

I'm currently testing the setup on a small environment, the network was shut down when i first plugged the router!! /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge1 /interface vlan add interface=ether9 name=10.10.10.1 vlan-id=10 add interface=ether9 name=10.10.20.1 vlan-id=20 add interface=ether9 ...

digitalinee

I had no success to make a PPPoE connection, when the wan interface is bridged to bridge1 the pppoe-client turns red saying it should not be on a slave interface.. /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge1 /interface vlan add interface=ether9 name=10.10.10.1 vlan-id=10 add interface=ether9 ...

digitalinee

Code: Select all
 /interface list member add list=LAN interface=10.10.10.1 
input does not match any value of list
Why am i facing this issue? this is apply to physical ports as well!!
You must first add the list itself:

/interface list add name=LAN
/interface list add name=WAN Okay

digitalinee

Code: Select all
 /interface list member add list=LAN interface=10.10.10.1 
input does not match any value of list
Why am i facing this issue? this is apply to physical ports as well!!

I have created the list lan successfully, and proceeding....

digitalinee

I have posted the full export text, i have nothing to hide. No ways that is the full config, i.e. there are no Interface info, etc. /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge1 /interface vlan add interface=ether9 name=10.10.10.1 vlan-id=10 add interface=ether9 name=10.10.20.1 vlan-id=20 add ...

digitalinee

 /interface list member add list=LAN interface=10.10.10.1 
input does not match any value of list

Why am i facing this issue? this is apply to physical ports as well!!

digitalinee

Waw!! that's a lot of new things to learn!!
You are so helpful man!! i will read about each one of those, i like understand things first before implementing them.

digitalinee

I have posted the full export text, i have nothing to hide.

digitalinee

This is the cisco switch setup: Switch#show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration : 1395 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Switch ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! spanning-tree mo...

digitalinee

Thank you Sindy & CZFan for your insights. Regarding the IP addresses i'm using, non of them is public, even the one of my ISP. So, this is the /export: /interface bridge add fast-forward=no name=bridge1 /interface vlan add interface=ether9 name=10.10.10.1 vlan-id=10 add interface=ether9 name=10...

digitalinee

Hello Sindy!! Can you please tell me what kind of mistake do i made? I have the same setup right now, the only new thing is that my port on the ISP side is vlan 959. When i add vlan 959 on the wan port I couldn’t ping to the ISP gateway, but when i added the same vlan on the cisco switch i had ping ...

digitalinee

Sorry for delay in response!! I was quite busy and had no enough time to reply so i really apologize. So the setup has some updates now, it appears that my ISP is providing me with service through a VLAN (959), i was no aware of it until i called the support center. I added the vlan 959 on the wan p...

digitalinee

Thank you for posting! I will read these articles tonight, meanwhile this is the setup i'm looking for, I want these vlans to pass through ether1 of the router to reach the PPPoE internet service provider. Note that the ISP does not deal with my vlans nor providing any vlan to me, so the vlan setup ...

digitalinee

Greeting everyone! So I have this setup on a cisco switch: ether1 vlan id=10 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 ether2 vlan id=20 ip address 10.10.20.2 255.255.255.0 ether3 vlan id=30 ip address 10.10.30.2 255.255.255.0 ether4 vlan id=40 ip address 10.10.40.2 255.255.255.0 ether5 vlan id=50 ip addr...

digitalinee

Okay, after reading your posts i decided to rethink the idea based on L2 setup, so i made a bridge and added the ports to that bridge, the PPPOE connection is working just fine, then i added the addresses but this time static ones since DHCP don't work on slave ports, then i added the NAT and i can ...

digitalinee

I believe so. But I still don't understand the whole thing. You have 172.19.59.0/24 on your router's ether1, you even have default gateway from this subnet, so it looks like regular config without PPPoE. You can also have PPPoE client on ether1 on top of that (I didn't test it, but I don't see why ...

digitalinee

PPPOE server is on the ISP side not mine. I understand from you that i can not put a router between clients and PPPOE server, is that correct?

digitalinee

Since all i do now is only testing by keep trying so many times to solve this issue i managed some times to reset the router to default settings and start over again. I have just realized that somehow i changed the IPs of ether2, 3, 4 from 172.19.x.x to 192.168.x.x Sorry for this inconvenience, and ...

digitalinee

I will remove the IP from the ether1 by tommorow and see the results.

digitalinee

I'm all open to your suggestions, what i have edited in my original post is the "class c" sentence which i have removed from the post. Let me rearrange for you: 1- I have a main switch that is connected to my ISP. 2- I have branch switches connected to the main switch. 3- I have computers ...

digitalinee

While i'm waiting for new thoughts from you guys to help me out with my case, i managed to setup DHCP servers for the networks, it worked and i can ping from any to any network but still can not make any PPPOE connections at all. So this is my new setup with the DHCP servers :) /ip pool add name=poo...

digitalinee

And what exactly doesn't work? If devices in those 192.168.x.x on ether2-4 use .1 (the router) as gateway and can communicate with each other, then they must also be able to connect to anything else the router itself is able to connect to. That's what the masquerade does, anything going out via eth...

digitalinee

Your gateway and Ether1 addresses don't match. One is 172.19.59.253 and the other is 172.19.59.254.

172.19.59.254 is my isp port IP address, 172.19.59.253 is my router ether1 port IP address.

digitalinee

Unfortunately, It didn't work :( /ip address add address=192.168.2.1/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.2.0 add address=192.168.3.1/24 interface=ether3 network=192.168.3.0 add address=192.168.4.1/24 interface=ether4 network=192.168.4.0 add address=172.19.59.253/24 interface=ether1 network=172.19.59...

digitalinee

Okay, so far the code below is doing what i need except for the pppoe connection, as for the connection between the three networks on ether2, 3 & 4, i can ping and communicate any pc to another one from the other networks, so the only problem for now is the pppoe that is not working: /ip address...

digitalinee

#1 computer (172.19.2.10) is on ether 2, it can ping to 172.19.2.1 (which is the ether 2 IP address). #2 computer (172.19.3.10) is on ether 3, it can ping to 172.19.3.1 (which is the ether 3 IP address). The two computers can not ping to each other. Unfortunately there are many unknowns in this cas...

digitalinee

#1 computer (172.19.2.10) is on ether 2, it can ping to 172.19.2.1 (which is the ether 2 IP address).
#2 computer (172.19.3.10) is on ether 3, it can ping to 172.19.3.1 (which is the ether 3 IP address).
The two computers can not ping to each other.

digitalinee

What's next thing to do for routing?

digitalinee

/ip address
add address=172.19.2.1/24 interface=ether2 network=172.19.2.0
add address=172.19.3.1/24 interface=ether3 network=172.19.3.0
add address=172.19.4.1/24 interface=ether4 network=172.19.4.0
add address=172.19.59.1/24 interface=ether1 network=172.19.59.0

digitalinee

Anyone please?

digitalinee

Greetings everyone, My isp network is 172.19.59.0/24 and it is a pppoe service, right now i have used over 120 address and the number is growing day by day. I have an idea of using a router board to open the limits of addresses for future growth by making new networks that can communicate with each ...

Search found 46 matches