MikroTik

trm3

ROS at this time only supports 1 connection mark that lasts the life of the session. This prevents the writing of efficient mangle code to handle a combination of QoS marking and multiple simultaneous WAN ingress/egress pathways. Support of this currently requires creation of an N x M size connectio...

trm3

As of 6.38.1 it does not work.... And I cannot remove the L2TP tunnel endpoint addresses, they get assigned regardless of profile/username settings.

I'm using EoIP, but I *really* need for native BCP bridging to carry the DHCP.

trm3

I would like to implement Radius authentication for multiple services on the same RouterOS device. In the past some devices client provided an automated prefix for the username based upon the type of service making the request (ppp-user, pptp-user, l2tp-user, login-user). I don't see any mechanism i...

trm3

Using an EoIP tunnel as a carrier for one of the PPP type tunnels works great, but only so long as an EoIP tunnel is viable... This means that it can't be used for dynamic endpoints. We really need to have Mikrotik address this issue.

trm3

Originally I was using OpenVPN and L2TP with MRRU set to 1600 bytes (that sets the tunnel to use MLPPP automatically). The two tunnel endpoints were the public IP addresses of the two Mikrotik boxes. The fix is to set up an EoIP tunnel between the two public IP addresses with an MTU of 1700 on each ...

trm3

Ok, I implemented a workaround that functions. Since EoIP handles this properly, I set up a 1700 byte MTU EoIP tunnel between the two physical endpoints, then I set up an L2TP tunnel *across the EoIP tunnel* with MTU and MRU set to 1500 bytes. This setup is testing out just fine. If you do this the ...

trm3

I have finally tracked down the source of an annoying packet loss issue that plagues my VPN links between Bangkok and London and between Bangkok and Singapore. The L2TP/PPTP/OpenVPN (all show same issue) tunnels are set up to service these VPNs using MTU sizes of 1460 and an MRRU value of 1600 so th...

trm3

When using an old Cisco Catalyst running CatOS the interface names all display identically as 10/100 utp ethernet (cat 3/5) (xxx) where (xxx) is the ifIndex number is there any way to have Dude display ifXEntry.ifName in the Interface selection drop-down of the Link data screen? Likewise to change t...

trm3

I have run into an odd situation. I have a primary VPN server (RB1100) that is connected using L2TP to one of several VPN clients. The L2TP tunnel interface is part of an 'inside' VRF. I cannot get redistribution of connected or static routes to function. the only way a connected route shows up is i...

trm3

Never mind, I disabled every non-essential package on the machine and had someone power cycle it. It now responds.

Tim McKee

trm3

Os 4.10, X86, Level 5 license Plain old minitower hardware No problems previously with this machine. It suddenly ignores all /system reboot, /system shutdown and watchdog initiated reboots. No special setup, it is just running RouterOS as a platform for a copy of the Dude Server... Any ideas??? Tim ...

trm3

This is not a 1:1 mapping, although I do have some of those in a different plac.

Chupaka's response is just what I expected and need, but was not in a position to test prior to turnup.

Many thanks for the fast responses!

Tim McKee

trm3

I am replacing an existing nat firewall. This device has multiple masquerade addresses. Given a set of public addresses, PUBa, PUBb, PUBc, each has a prefix list of internal address prefixes associated with it, LISTa, LISTb, LISTc. What is the best method of setting this up in the NAT table? Many th...

trm3

In my case it turned out to be the memory SIMs. I switched back to the original 512M SIMs shipped with the unit and the problem went away. I really need 2Gb for large multiple feed BGP tables...

Can anyone from MT publish the required specs for memory and/or suggested memory modules?

Tim

trm3

Can anyone provide me with make/model of a mini-PCI version of Verizon/Sprint/AT&T compatible EVDO cards that will work with RouterOS on a standard routerboard or alix/soekris board???

Many thanks,

Tim McKee

trm3

this occurs with both 3.23 and 4.0b3

trm3

If I initiate a ping from a PE node to a remotely attached CE node on VRF-A using the following command: ping 192.168.199.5 routing-table=VRF-A source-address=172.30.16.1 (the ip address 172.30.16.1 is assigned to a loopback bridge interface on the PE node that is part of the VRF-A address space) Th...

trm3

Resolved and looking good in 4.0b3.

trm3

I have 3 brand new RB1000 units in a test lab configuration. They are truly wonderful devices except that they won't reboot without a full power cycle. Actually 1 of the 3 will very rarely reboot. The routerboard firmware is at the latest (2.18) rev level. Has anyone else seen this? Is there any fix...

trm3

Option to display link utilization on the line as graphical %utilization rather than textually would be striking.

How about side-by-side speedometers, one TX, one RX with red filled sweep.

trm3

Example. i have chain of some hosts, one host is down, i hit "Ack", and forget it. After some time host is up, all is fine, but when host is down again, he is allready acknowledged. i think its wrong, and every time, when acknowledged host is up, he must be automatically unacknowledged. O...

trm3

Never mind, it did indeed expand the text on submit.

tim

trm3

How do you set up the signature line there???

I log in successfully, then when I click the signature button I get '**~~~~' as a signature. I'm sure that is not what is wanted unless it is automatically expanded on saving???

trm3

I have to interface with 100+ VRFs per node and redistribute to/from RIP in order to support iDirect satellite router equipment. Is there any chance that RIP will be added to OSPF as a VRF aware routing table?

tim

trm3

any idea when an updated routing package might be available? I need to be able to test multicast along with MPLS and I don't think you can do that in 3.x.

trm3

superb, thanks!

trm3

I guess they haven't fixed it in the 4.0b2 train yet...

Normis, can you comment?

trm3

As I test more, it appears that a redistribute connected in BPG is (on all non-local nodes) showing up in the VPN4 table without a netmask (which I assume is a /32 convention). The local VPN4 table is showing it correctly with a /30 netmask.

trm3

I have successfully established a test network using 3 RB1000 units in a loop configuration using OSPF between each other. Lab2 and Lab3 have a test VRF linked by OSPF to 2 small Soekris boxes running MT4.0b2. All instances of OSPF are set to redistribute connected, static, and bgp; bgp is set to re...

trm3

Working now... Thanks for the help....

It actually works much better when you force a Cisco switch port into trunking mode if the link is on a Vlan... It's no wonder the OSPF neighbors wouldn't set up...

trm3

Can someone provide me the proper syntax to establish multiple OSPF instances (one per VRF)? I can set up the instances, but don't see any way to identify NETWORK entries as belonging to specific instances... I'm probably too Cisco indoctrinated. I am running a backone OSPF instance tying my core MT...

trm3

The ability to specify different redistribution rules for each VRF (for BGP/OSPF/RIP/Static/Connected) is a must in our environment. We have a global Cisco MPLS network with each VRF having a /27 or /28 presence in every major node with interconnected customer/satellite routers. We need either indiv...

trm3

I have a very specific need for real unencrypted GRE tunnels rather than IPIP tunnels. Some of the hardware that my customers' satellite traffic traverses can apply various spoofing / window adjustment acceleration procedures to both native traffic and GRE tunnels, but not IPIP or any other form of ...

trm3

I am running a global Cisco 75xx MPLS network on IOS 12.0S and 12.4 trains. I have hopes that I can replace these monsters eventually with Mikrotik boxes. I could most likely provide you with access to a test bed 7513...

Tim McKee
tmckee at sdnglobal dqt com

trm3

A simple TFTP server would be invaluable to us. I would like nothing better then to replace complex multi-box VOIP configurations with a simple MT box.

Tim McKee

Search found 35 matches

Feature Request: Add Connection_Routing_Mark

Re: Problem with DHCP over BCP bridging

Differentiating Radius authentication usernames on service

Re: MLPPP Reassembly Algorithm Issue

Re: MLPPP Reassembly Algorithm Issue

Re: MLPPP Reassembly Algorithm Issue

MLPPP Reassembly Algorithm Issue

Interface name on CatOS

OSPF / VRF Connected/Static route redistribution

Re: Reboot/Shutdown/WatchdogReset ignored

Reboot/Shutdown/WatchdogReset ignored

Re: NAT - Multiple masquerade

NAT - Multiple masquerade

Re: RB1000 Reboot Issues

EVDO/WWAN (US Version)

Re: RB1000 Reboot Issues

Ping VRF issue

Re: MPLS/VRF Route Issue (Bug in 4.0b2 ??)

RB1000 Reboot Issues

Link Utilization

Re: Vote for new DUDE features!

Re: Feature Requests - Let Mikrotik know

Re: Feature Requests - Let Mikrotik know

VRF aware RIPv2 Requirement

Re: MPLS/VRF Route Issue (Bug in 4.0b2 ??)

Re: Syntax Query

Re: MPLS/VRF Route Issue (Bug in 4.0b2 ??)

Re: MPLS/VRF Route Issue (Bug in 4.0b2 ??)

MPLS/VRF Route Issue (Bug in 4.0b2 ??)

Re: Syntax Query

Syntax Query

Re: v4.0 Feature Request(s)

Re: v4.0 Feature Request(s)

Re: MPLS/VPLS testing

Re: Feature Request : TFTP server