There are no VLANs defined so... it can not work at all at this stage... VLANs (or the lack there off) isn't relevant here, once the packets get to the AP's interface, it's all just the untagged traffic as far as the AP is concerned and will flow through the network as untagged traffic. Otherwise, ...
Sorry for bumping this thread but I too am interested in this feature. Not because it has much use to me but just because I like to experiment with things. Don't get me wrong, NTP is fine for my needs but I just like to fiddle with things honestly. One minor thing I noticed is that even two of the s...
So I've been fiddling around and discovered the issue wasn't with the network itself, it was my Windows PC.
Apparently, I had to disable the "Large Send Offload V2 (IPv4)" setting for my NIC in the device manager.
Sadly, adding an additional switch (CRS317-1G-16S+) didn't work, for fixing the upload speed
.It did, however, fix the LAN speed, so that's worth something.
\o/ Victory! https://i.imgur.com/yAOLnEc.png For those that come by this later (read: "dear future self"): [admin@Main Router] /ip firewall nat> print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 ;;; Traefik Ingress (HTTPS) chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=10.0.0.149 to-ports=44...
I now have the following two rules according to that wiki article: [admin@Main Router] /ip firewall nat> print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 chain=srcnat action=masquerade src-address=10.0.0.0/8 dst-address=10.0.0.149 out-interface=bridge1 log=yes log-prefix="[LAN]" 1 ;;;...
The proxy is there so that I can have multiple back-ends on 1 WAN IP (1.2.3.4) and port (443). Basically the proxy matches from the HTTP headers like this (and forwards request accordingly): - "test.finlaydag33k.nl" -> 10.0.1.123 - "www.finlaydag33k.nl" -> 10.0.1.133 - "some...
In this case, it's basically a webserver that forwards requests to a back-end. How it's hooked up, how it functions etc. etc. is irrelevant otherwise. Basically what the MikroTik router does is: - See if request comes from LAN, destined for 1.2.3.4 (my WAN IP) - Sends it to the proxy as 10.0.0.1 (th...
Hii there, Yea, the title may not really make any sense so let me explain. I have a traefik proxy that proxies data to back-end applications. let's say my router's WAN IP is 1.2.3.4 and its LAN IP is 10.0.0.1. Now when I try to access something through the proxy, everything goes fine except one thin...
But it also doesn't explain the issue where with the switch, it works perfectly fine? The link to the modem is the same in that case but somehow it isn't affected by the issue? The SFP+ module could be autonegotiating correctly to 1Gbps in the switch but not the router. That is definitely an option...
You might want to try rate limiting on your modem port (probably egress) to close of what your internet speed is. Tested it, setting it *slightly* under what I should be able to get (300/30 is what I should get, set it to 250/25) but this only lowers download without affecting upload at all (just s...
Yes I can :) Though it doesn't seem like anything weird is going on there? https://i.imgur.com/jJbxYso.png The "rate" is 10Gbit because I use an SFP+ module but the link to the modem itself is 1Gbit (the modem only has 1Gbit ethernet ports on it). Also, considering that if I use the 1gbit ...
The link to the modem is 1gbit.
The download from the ISP is 300mbit and my upload is 30mbit.
I can reach the 300mbit download pretty fine through the SFP+ but the upload is only 1/3rd of what it should reach.
So even if it didn't negotiate down, it doesn't explain why my upload is so poor.
I have set my queue type to an `mq-pfifo` resulting in this: # INTERFACE QUEUE ACTIVE-QUEUE 0 ether1 only-hardware-queue only-hardware-queue 1 ;;; To Modem sfp-sfpplus1 multi-queue-ethernet-default multi-queue-ethernet-default 2 ;;; To Main PC (sfp+) sfp-sfpplus2 multi-queue-ethernet-default multi-q...
So I've done some deeper diving and found that the 10Gbit speed to my server is due to the thing lacking the switching performance to do this.
Though it doesn't explain why I can't hit my full upload to speedtest while with a switch between it I can :|
Hii there, I just got in my CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS to replace my CRS326-12G-12S+RM as a router (and make it just a switch) and went to hook it up. Once I was done, however, I ran into a pretty big issue. Any direct uplinks (to server and my desktop) made through my SFP+ are rather bad. This is the uploa...
Thanks for your reply.
There is only a modem in front without routing capability (my MikroTik router is the first in line for handling routing).
Before this I had a PfSense box which worked perfectly (until it died)
Hii there, I'm trying to fix an error on my website, which I can now track to my MikroTik router. When I try to get the Client IP, it returns as `10.0.0.1` no matter what (LAN devices and WAN devices - eg. those on 4G). This, of course, isn't exactly desireable so now I need to fix it... but I have ...
I have managed to get most of this working except for the isolation and the DHCP pools for AP1's main and guest network.
They currently take away from the "Cabled" pool instead of the pools I want to assign them ("wireless" and "wireless-guest" respectively).
Hii there, I'm trying to have my MikroTik hAP AC Lite use my router's (CRS326-24G-2S+RM) DHCP. To do so, I have done the following (following the guide on the Manual , with some minor changes that should have no effect?): Plugged the ether1 port from the AP (still off at this time) into the ether3 f...
Hii there, Yesterday, I have received my new `CRS326-24G-2S+` (I will refer to it as "router") along with two `hAP AC Lite` (will be "AP1" and "AP2" respectively). I also have a Dell PE2748 (will be "switch") in "unmanaged"-mode that has most of my &...