The DHCP client has to be enabled for the WAN port otherwise no internet connection. I've not had chance to dig deeper into this but I will.Therefore as Halvoetn suggested check/disable DHCP client on hAP.
Simple in terms of a SOHO running their own Windows Server AD environment.Simple ??
Not that easy to know whether the fault has been reported already.Please just report here in this topic.
Oh no, JiraAnd regarding the free ticket system: Mikrotik uses a commercial ticket system: https://help.mikrotik.com/servicedesk/servicedesk
I'm sticking with the legacy wireless drivers for this very reason. Really do need to either replace CAPsMAN with a better controller system or sort out the driver.Rather I face the immense disadvantage of configuring vlans manually on each cAP.
Omidirectional, best signal possible and passive PoE supply. Still need Wi-Fi 4 connectivity.Can you please add the requirements (apart from being outside and handling 20 caravans)?
I don't do RouterOS scripting very often and as the syntax isn't entirely natural, I've been using ChatGPT with great success today with even some of the basics. Quite scary really.so I went to the forbidden road of asking CHATGPT and it gave me these results
Giving this a go! Disabled it on 5Ghz interface and switched back from WPA2/3 to WPA/WPA2.Easy bet. It is already known this is the root of the issue. That's why people commonly tinker around with connect-priority.
Understood but I was mainly looking the receive signal strength of the hAP devices for comparison.Legacy wireless driver does not support 802.11w. So you won't spot a SA query timeout in HAP AC lite logs.
Intrigued what you don't like so much?I am not willing to go back into the UniF--k ecosystem.
That's all I've ever seen DFS related in the logs.So it logs events only if radar is detected: no messages about starting or finishing a scan.
So won't all networking solutions based on the Linux kernel have the same issues/limitations?It's not a MikroTik problem, it's a Linux switchdev/DSA problem, which will never be solved because it's embedded deep into Linux Kernel source code.
Hmm.... I'm not sure I agree with Mikrotik...AX is better than AC....
Or consider a Powerline plugged into mains. When these work, they work well and far easier than running cables.So again: get some wires laid and install multiple APs, placed on trategic places
What's the tx power and channel?The ax3 is working properly, but the wireless performance is really poor.
This was the other suggestion made that I've not tried yet.has anyone tried to set "disabled" for management protection?
No but I will have a go. Doesn't that reduce security?has anyone tried to set "disabled" for management protection?
Thanks for making me smile as my head is exploding looking at new CAPsMAN, cAP ac and qcom-ac.You must be joking.
Do you really expect Mikrotik to suddenly break their years long tradition of naming things in the most confusing manner possible?
No chance.
I really shouldn't try and look at this stuff late on What a can of worms I've wandered into...I whole heartedly agree ... and hope that they'll bring them up to the same level eventually.
Agreed. Will switch to other thread.Maybe it is better if we do not hijack @dalami's thread.
How do you query this setting? /interface/wifi/configuration/print doesn't show anything. It doesn't appear in /export either.solution for me:
Code: Select all/interface/wifiwave2/configuration> set [find] security.connect-priority=0/1
Thanks for that - hadn't come across it before. Experimenting and learning more about VLANS and that looks very useful.Check this tutorial, the "de facto" guide around here for everything vlan:
viewtopic.php?t=143620
Part labeled: Access Point
I will now that somebody else has confirmed it... that's all I was waiting for.However: create a support ticket!
It was in reference to the comment about Linux client.What does a silly rant about your inability to configure a capac have to with entering a support ticket for winbox ???
Not exactly at all. You either have to set-up CAPsMAN (not easy) or configured wireless entries (also not trivial).Exactly like this.
Indeed - some older kit struggles with channel 149 and above.Also:
Are you sure your wifi is not using a channel which your client devices can not see ?
AX tend to favor the higher frequencies but quite a lot of devices are unable to use them.
LOL - the Java app is the UniFi controller also running on the same box.winbox64.exe consuming more RAM than java.exe. Congratulations MikroTik! That's an achievement
I had to do something similar. Would netinstall also be a way to update? Not as easy but I assume it doesn't have to have in effect two copies of the OS on there for a time.I dont know if this the correct way to do it, but it is working - at least for me.
Probably a good idea... it's just my lab test device. Real shame this low end devices didn't have a little bit more storage.It might be wiser to stay on 7.12.x for that device until they fix that space issue for 16Mb devices.
Otherwise you'd be constantly looking at the edge.
It does seem rather confused. Along with vague notions of how frequency/channel selection works with DFS/radar collision. I've asked for a whitepaper type article on this entire topic which I feel would remove a lot of the guesswork.What a mess.
Another quirkWith spaces, "" are needed
Or just enter county value on the next line .. without ""
[admin@ROUTER001] > /interface/wifi/radio/reg-info
country: "United Kingdom"
Script Error: action cancelled
With the caveat that this doesn't work with countries with space in the name.If spelling of country name is unkbnown ... type "a" then <TAB> key ....
Ahh, was the table I found outside powers? Are they higher or lower typically? Also, 112 pages! Typicalhttps://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/ ... r-2030.pdf
Page 42 SRD devices
Always thought they were pretty decent chips?Qualcomm
A question - what chips do they use?I don't think MikroTik uses any MediaTek wifi chips?
For many on FTTC internet, Wi-Fi 4 is adequate!In either case, Wifi 6 is more than adequate for my needs.