For anyone wondering, I was able to boot CHR on the Hetzner ARM instance with this versionWhat's new in 7.15rc1 (2024-Apr-18 12:17):
!) system - added support for AMPERE (R) and ARM64 CHR installations (new ARM64 CHR image available);
You "logging stuff" to a USB drive is probably kiling the flash write cycles, if you really want to do that, you should use a USB hard drive, not a Flash based memory.I wanted to log stuff to a USB dongle...
Report with a support case, maybe they will see and solve faster, I also have the same problem.no link on SFP+ interfaces on CRS310-8G+2S+IN (SwOS 2.16)!!!!! RouterOS all OK
I can confirm that this is fixed, now I can use 2.5G NIC's when using the RB5009 with the S+RJ10 on the SFP+ slot. Also 10G on the same module is also working fine.*) sfp - fixed false link detection with S+RJ10 on RB5009;
Yes, I'm. <removed>jookraw Give me your Messenger or What's Up? Are You from Poland?![]()
skip-dfs-channels=10min-cac
You don´t need 160Mhz to get more than 500Mbps as you can see below:ax2 has maximum 80MHz channel? Not support 160MHz?
But on UPC router Wi-Fi 5 I have 500 Mbit/s…
I've made the tests with a Windows PC with Intel AX200 WiFi card, I also have tested with my phone, Galaxy S21what Wi-Fi client device are you using for that tests??
Polandfrom which country are you?
Sorry, did not catch that was a joke, no problem.It was a joke but ok, not well received.
it does not support 48V, max is 28v.At 48V it will most likely be the same![]()
at 20v I got a reading of ~4.5wHow many watts does it idle at?
I know it. this is why the Bridge HW Vlan filtering is neededIt doesn't work that way anymore in wifiwave2.
Vlan via bridge.
I was asking myself the same question, as the new WiFi Wave2 does not have vlan tag as a option on the wifi interface options.Will hAP ax2 support bridge HW offloaded vlan-filtering?
Report here: https://help.mikrotik.com/servicedesk/s ... on=portalsRB1200 from 6.49.6 > all ros 7 version even 7.4rc2
ether1-8 not working
Only 9 and 10 eth working.
Downgrade to 6.49.6 working fine
Anyone with RB1200 and ros 7 with normal operation ?
Yes, I always do after the updateHave you tried to upgrade firmware?I've updated both my RB4011 and hap ac3(ww2). all seems fine except the hAPac3 is showing some strange lines each time that it
...
This did not happen on 7.2.3
Anyone with this issue?
to be frank, I have no idea... this info was what I got from support when opened a ticket for high cpu usage on my RB4011 before the fasttrack was fixed.btw. if there's no route-cache on v7, then what does "/ip settings set route-cache=yes" do?
I don't have a modem, it is PPPoE over GPON, so, I have only a fiber ONT, but no, happen only when terminated by the other side.Can’t you trigger the symptom by rebooting the ISP modem?
I was using the default config, that means, all. since them I switched to only the ones marked as WAN.what interface do you have zerotier bound to?
[j@RB4011] > /ip/dns/print
servers: 2620:fe::fe,9.9.9.9
dynamic-servers:
use-doh-server:
verify-doh-cert: no
...
Welcome to the RB5009 unfinished product club.Have 7.1 version installed. Still no hardware offloding option.
In other words, the 7.1 is a exact copy (as there is changelog between) of 7.1rc7, as the same well reported bugs are still here...v7.1 contains routing fixes and improvements in order to fully comply with 6.x setups.
What about the cAP XL ac, it was lauched months ago, after the wifiwave2 was around?CAPsMAN does not support WW2 at the moment.
Note that WW2 is planned for future devices, that's why there are additional requirements in terms of hardware.
I know that, I was just trying to use one switch of the two, but still no luck...Keep in mind that RB4011 has two switch chips... Bridging ports from both chips makes the/some traffic go through the CPU.
/interface ethernet switch port
...
set 2 default-vlan-id=88 vlan-header=leave-as-is vlan-mode=secure
...
+1Is there any support for L3 HW offload on RB5009? And, especially, NAT?
not in the case of using a Routerboard without a switch chip or with a limited one (like RB4011).With that settings I give some clue & hint for someone...
Simply "copy" broadcasted mDNS/SSDP between VLANs.
No something named "mDNS proxy" required...
@normis, basically some users, like me, want to isolate IoT devices by the L2 domain. but still allowing some connections to start from the trusted side.Yes, the question is, why separate the IoT, if you don't really need to separate ?