fwiw i manage to get around 1 full gbit over vlan routing..

Just as I predicted in post #3 above

Spot on!

Many thanks for taking the time out to help! Much appreciated.

fwiw i manage to get around 1 full gbit over vlan routing.. and a little bit less when the gw was set to rt-core-01

Solved. I did a full netinstall, and set the device up manually, checking routes and such as i went along. Now i can reach 900mbit inter-vlan routing with iperf3 without going to the rt-core-01.

Ok i am not aware of netinstall.. I will have a read and report back

Does it work if you run ping command but without setting interface? It still seems to me that config somehow got borken and that the only way out is full configuration reset (you can try with factory reset first). /ping address=192.168.10.182 works as expected. I have done a full configuration rese...

When run from CRS (and NAS is running), does this command succeed? /ping address=192.168.10.182 interface=VLAN-10-MGMT Nothing in config doesn't strike me as odd ... Ah there it is, its a timeout when doing that.. [admin@sw-core-02] /interface bridge> /ping address=192.168.10.182 interface=VLAN-10-...

If it is a routing issue, then a plain "traceroute" should show it. But limitation of throughput to 1Gbps can be due to many things... traceroute to 192.168.10.182 (192.168.10.182), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.10.10.5 (10.10.10.5) 0.515 ms 0.374 ms 0.224 ms 2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1....

In this setup, would ethernet1 need to be apart of the bridge? i will eventually replace ethernet1 to a sfp+ port to uplink to the switch. Here is a diagram to better try and explain what i am doing. https://i.imgur.com/B06hlBg.png As you can see, when linux01 and linux02 try to use iperf3, it uses ...

... but when pinging within the same vlan, in this case vlan100 from port spf3 to spf1 it goes through ethernet1,

How do you verify it performs this way?

This was an iperf3 test between two hosts on the same vlan, the speed came to 1gbit and i could see the ether1 port was maxed out.

What does traceroute between those test hosts show? What does /ip route print show? Just noticed: there's missing config detail in /interface bridge vlan : sfp-sfpplus1 should be declared as untagged member of VLAN 100, setting interface with pvid is not sufficient set [ find vlan-ids=100 ] untagge...

many thanks for your reply. I added add admin-mac=6C:3B:6B:EB:75:43 auto-mac=no frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged name=bridge pvid=999 vlan-filtering=yes to /interface bridge however i still get ICMP traffic past the CRS, this means the Mikrotik is not routing vlan traffic as it should for some rea...

I have come a bit further with this. # jan/02/1970 13:17:13 by RouterOS 6.45.7 # software id = SP97-FB0N # model = CRS317-1G-16S+ /interface bridge add admin-mac=6C:3B:6B:EB:75:43 auto-mac=no name=bridge vlan-filtering=yes /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=sfp-sfpplus1 ] comment=esxi03 /in...

Many thanks, i never saw those speed tests results!

According to those results, this switch never operates (switches) at the full 10bge speed? (9536mbps) ?

If i wanted to use the switch with vlan routing, then i still need RouterOS correct? or can i just use the SwOS?

In my setup i have a WAN router which provides my VLAN to my network, however this is only a 1gbit link therefore i have purchased a CRS317-1G-16S+ to have between my ESXi hosts providing 10gbit vlan routing. Im new to Mikrotik but do i understand this correctly. rt-core01 (non mikrotik 1gbit) vlan ...