I receive a /48 IPv6 Prefix from my Provider. This prefix is split into /64 for LAN assignment. This works, but I can't choose the prefix the Mikrotik will generate. Example: # ADDRESS FROM-POOL INTERFACE ADVERTISE 0 G XXXX:XXXX:d80b::1/64 init7 vlan50 yes 1 G XXXX:XXXX:d80b:1::1/64 init7 vlan90 yes...
Same issue here, tried about 5 different SD Cards from different vendors and different Capacity but none of them works. Also tried to remove all partitions + partition table. But the CCR1009 is not able to detect them. Tested with RouterOS 7.1.1.
Thanks @hzdrro @netravnen, this was the issue! It now works.
Another question: The device now creates addresses in the format XXXX:XXXX:d80b::1, XXXX:XXXX:d80b:1::1, XXXX:XXXX:d80b:2::1 and so on. Is it possible to set this number myself? e.g. to get XXXX:XXXX:d80b:50::1 on VLAN50?
Running RouterOS 7.1rc4 on a CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+. I set up a DHCP Client to request a /48 Pool from my Provider. Now I want to provide a /64 from this Pool to two VLAN's. But the system tells me that the Pool is exhausted after the first /64 assignement. Did I do something wrong?
Thanks, this looks pretty amazing! I didn't notice that I can attach scripts to a DHCP Client, this opens whole new possibilities. I'm still a Mikrotik NOOB, sorry for my dumb assumptions. Disabled default route on the DHCP clients + Added the three routes + Configured the two DHCP clients with the ...
Ok, I got confused by isp1gateway and isp2gateway. But I think it still doesn't really help for my use case. I get the IP + Gateway via DHCP. IP + Gateway is dynamic. So I shouldn't hard code these into some scripts or routes. Your example hard codes the Gateway into the script, but these could chan...
I already searched for hours for a ready solution, but didn't find any ready made solution. I get the IP + Gateway dynamically via DHCP for both WAN. Thus this solution won't work. Also I don't want to Ping the Gateway, I want to ping an Endpoint in the Internet. Pinging the Gateway won't guarantee ...
Hello I have a setup with Dual WAN. I would like to replicate the current EdgeRouter based setup. The current EdgeRouter Setup pings one IP on the Internet from both Interfaces. It automatically creates two internal Routing Tables with one or the other Interfaces Gateway as Default Gateway. It then ...
I've now performed a Reset Configuration and afterwards ran my two WG config commands again. This time WG is working without Kernel Crash. I have no explanation for this. Maybe something weird happened during Update 6.47->7.1beta6 which prevented WG to work.
I just tried it with the Cloud Hosted Router Image, also version 7.1beta6, with the exact same Configuration. With the Cloud Hosted Router Image I don't get a Kernel Crash. Can someone from Mikrotik confirm this Bug?
Hello I'm trying to configure a Wireguard connection with 7.1beta6 on CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+. But always after adding the Peer it crashes. The Interface can be configured without issues: [admin@MikroTik] > /interface wireguard print Flags: X - disabled; R - running 0 R name="rbg0" mtu=1420 list...
I don't yet fully understand what the Offloading in the RB4011 is capable off. Is there a table or something like that available? Can I run netflow to a server with 1Gbit/s traffic routed over it? Can I put vlan tagged traffic out on the RJ45 ports? Can I run separate networks on the RJ45 ports on t...