MikroTik

Rafale30

Join us from March 3–6, 2025, for an exclusive first look at our newest outdoor 5G solutions

Outdoor 5G solution ... Outdoor 5G solution .... Outdoor 5G solution

I can't waiiiit raaaahhh !

Rafale30

Any idea ? I have make a full reinstall on fresh and isalated installation, i have de same issue and the same error in log: prerouting: in:bridge out:(unknown 0), connection-state:established,dnat src-mac e0:63:da:81:02:47, proto TCP (SYN,ACK), 192.168.88.253:443->77.205.21.163:46804, NAT (192.168.8...

Rafale30

Yes,you are right, here is the complete configuration, I took the time to clean everything at the security level. Please find the new platform of test with this configuration, same issue: Public IP ISP1 port 502 >>> RT_HEX forward to 443 trough wireguard >>> RT_ATL forward to PC port 443 Mikrotik_do...

Rafale30

1. MAIN ROUTER is wireguard server peer for handshake Y/N -> YES 2. External www users should reach the server indirectly by contacting the main router which forwards that to the server via the wireguard tunnel Y/N -> YES 3. The pC hosting the server should, for all its other traffic needs, go out t...

Rafale30

This is my current config, and my result : Connections on ATL (the IP 77.205..... is my external device), the final port 443 is only for test with an HTTPS webserver: Capture d’écran 2024-10-29 104132.png And my config on the ATL: Capture d’écran 2024-10-29 104312.png Capture d’écran 2024-10-29 1042...

Rafale30

This is it. The port is an exemple for the simplification. In fine, it's to acces to a webservice. Is only for M2M transactions, with devices who contact an API (embedded on the PC/server). So, some few connections. The external device contact the HEX via ISP1 on port 502, the port is forwarded to A...

Rafale30

Hello Anav :D , Because this picture is the light version of need. ISP1 is not on the same place of the ISP2. To put it simply, the goal is to be able to have NAT routing on IPs that cannot have it. Typically on standard SIMs without a fixed IP. I already have this type of infrastructure (based on W...

Rafale30

Hello, What is the best practice to make a correct "double NAT" when i have 2 different WAN. I have add dst-nat to NAT the 502 port on RT_HEX, NAT ISP1 WAN to go to RT_ATL, and a dst-nat 502 port on RT_ATL to go to PC, through the wireguard. ISP1 is a HEX on a fiber with static IP, ISP2 is...

Rafale30

But, were are the external 5G devices ?
September 2024, watched in the 2019/2020 roadmap and no new about a ATL/LHGM 5G, or, most adapted on a wAP form factor.

Very curious, no ?

Rafale30

Hello,

To the Mikrotik team, do you have any idea about the availability of the LTE+5G outdoor devices ?

If i look to roadmap published in 2019/2020 :

Do you have some information ?

Rafale30

Where is Saved connection Group and RoMon address columns in Winbox 4 ?

Same ! Is very usefull ! Not found

Rafale30

I tried, and indeed, the graph continues to appear :-( In fact, i use a monitoring with a screen and a computer on W10, with autostart and on each boot, the windows mouse, not used is on strict center. And, logic, i have always a device located right under the mouse :lol: (Average 100 devices with f...

Rafale30

Hello,

Someone have and idea of the release of the future ATL 5G or any oudoor 5G SA/NSA device ?

We can't wait !!

Rafale30

Hello,

Any idea to deactivate the graph who appears with the mouse over a device?

Rafale30

And make childrens happy

Rafale30

Hello ! I'm having some trouble finding the EG12 and EG18 modem commands. I search to make a script who control the eNB. If the modem toggle to a specific eNB, i would like to switch to another (with a reset AT command, but for quectel ...) Do you have an idea to have the result of the info of eNB ?

Rafale30

No idea ?

I have found a potential bug. If i force the band of the ISP tower, the LHGM sync in LTE, with one or 2 band (CA) for exemple.
if I don't specify the band, the LHGM doesn't connect in LTE mode, only HSUPA !

Like the LHGM doesn't retrieve the band used automatically by the ISP !

Rafale30

Hello, I work on test with the new LHGGM (LHGGM&EG18-EA). I have a problem with several ISP on FRANCE. With the ISP SFR, impossible to switch on LTE, only HSUPA (FW 7.6 // FW MODEM UP TO DATE) But, when i try an other ISP, FREE MOBILE, connected on LTE with 2CA perfectly. So, what's happened wit...

Rafale30

Probably me, but in France.

Issue : some SXT (3 or 4 this summer) crashs radomly, without any message in log. Updated (FW + Bootloader + LTE).
The watchdog don't reboot the device, need to shutdown the power supply.

Is the same issue ?

Rafale30

Upgrade to V034 since 13 days : No CA since the upgrade (RBLHGGR)

Reboot, upgrade to lastest ROS 7.4.1: no CA. No problem with CA with the previous version, of course.

Rafale30

Problem solved !

Issue due to an Ubiquiti WLAN out of date. I have, between my MT hEX and my LHGG an old WLAN ubiquity with a POE output (to link the LHGG), to simplify my installation....

Ubiquity replaced by a simple AC LR, direct connection between my hEX and my LHGG : full bandwith !

Rafale30

Yes, all ports are in gigabit, all links are ok. U can find my config in attachment. But i have make some other tests and the problem seems to be linked to the first router : the LHGG ! Because i have already an ubiquiti er-X in place (who i want to replace), and this router have .... the same limit...

Rafale30

Hello all ! I have a trouble between 2 router in cascade. The first, an LHGG (LTE6 in router mode), second an hEX. This config (router+router) is due to isolate some clients on another network. Problem, i have 150 mbits of bandwidth connected directly on my LHGG, 45/50 max on the hEX (CPU low, no ot...

Rafale30

BFD is not yet implemented :-(

??? But the functionality is present in V7.1.3 and functioning ?

Rafale30

Hi all, Someone have a problem with route -> checking gateway with bfd, on hEX, on V7.2 (fresh install) ? I have this config who works like a charm on hEX/Chateau (tuned for each, of course) on 7.1.3 (not tested on newer): /ip/firewall nat add comment="Masquerade LTE NOMINAL" chain=srcnat ...

Rafale30

Any idea @anav ?

Rafale30

Yes, it's a router with nated rules. I have access to the router, the curent config is : NAT to 192.168.0.240 // TCP // Ports : 10000-10100 Only the ETH1 and 2 are used (Ether3 is down). I used the L2TP config only to access on client behind a CGNAT, on LTE operators. The goal is only to access of e...

Rafale30

Yes, a diagram is better that a long speech !

Rafale30

Hi, have you tried using Source NAT together with Destination NAT? Once you open communication with your hEX on specific dst port, you are using your public IP as a source. hEX forwards the traffic to the L2TP tunnel, but the source IP remains the same. I’d say when you connect to “54.0.0.2:10012”,...

Rafale30

Hello the community ! A have some mikrotik devices connected with L2TP/IPsec on a hEX (v6.48.4). I search to connect with winbox to each mikrotik devices. This L2TP is ONLY for admin the router, not sharing any data through the VPN. So, i want try to connect on my hEX who manage all L2TP client with...

Rafale30

Thanks you for your reply !

Rafale30

LHGGR have got a R11e-LTE6 and SoC who is core of LTE have very slow re-connection times. Best is use at*cell=0 to do faster re-connection at this lte card, we not discover anything faster. at*cell=0 is ~20s enable lte1 is ~45s Thanks you SiB. The best is using the netwatch ? Like ping 8.8.8.8 with...

Rafale30

No informations ?

Rafale30

Hello, I use many of your LTE devices (LHG/LHGG/Chateau12/Chateau5G/Wap etc ....). I have experienced a very fast LTE reconnection with the Chateau12 since the RoS V7.6. Like 3-5 sec to reconnect when the LTE signal is lost. But very very slow reconnection with other devices (LHGG for exemple). I' h...

Rafale30

After 2 days of research, i've found my solution:

First, before adding any mangle, think to disactivate the fasttrack !

And apply this procedure : https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Q ... Q_Examples

Result : bandwidth applied on all connection with a fixed speed.

Rafale30

Hello everybody, I try to limit the bandwidth on some RouterOS devices (like LTE, wAP ...). I have see some scripts or tutorial to limit, but i my case, i search the limitation based on connections when the router don't manage the DHCP or when the device is behind another router, so not on the IP. I...

Rafale30

Hi Redmonkey,

Any news about your SIP issue ? I have the same problem with chateau v7, no problem with another devices with the lastest release of v6.

Search found 37 matches

Re: Newsletter #123 | February 2025

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Double NAT with 2 WAN and wireguard

Re: Newsletter #120 | September 2024

Road to outdoor 5G - Any news of the roadmap ?

Re: Newsletter #120 | September 2024

Re: Mouse over devices

ATL 5G SA/NSA

Mouse over devices

Many Mikrotik boxes ? Just recycle !

Chateau12 / LHGG18 // Modem command for eNB

Re: New LHGGM LTE18 // No LTE on several ISP

New LHGGM LTE18 // No LTE on several ISP

Re: SXT LTE6 - Drops out on UK 3 Network

Re: R11e-LTE6 modem firmware changelog

Re: 2 MT routers in cascade

Re: 2 MT routers in cascade

2 MT routers in cascade

Re: v7.2 is released!

Re: v7.2 is released!

Re: L2TP - Port forwarding from WAN to L2TP device

Re: L2TP - Port forwarding from WAN to L2TP device

Re: L2TP - Port forwarding from WAN to L2TP device

Re: L2TP - Port forwarding from WAN to L2TP device

L2TP - Port forwarding from WAN to L2TP device

Re: LTE DEVICES - Slow LTE reconnexion

Re: LTE DEVICES - Slow LTE reconnexion

Re: LTE DEVICES - Slow LTE reconnexion

LTE DEVICES - Slow LTE reconnexion

Re: Bandwidth limitation per connections [SOLVED]

Bandwidth limitation per connections [SOLVED]

Re: Chateau LTE12, No VoIP with RouterOS v7.0beta7 or beta8, works with beta5 and beta6