MikroTik

canram

Heavy weathers again, last night. But this time, CM9 did not die. Im really sure, that the Pac Wireless Antenne was the reason for my dying CM9s. The GP-2400-12 seems to be a perfect replacement.

canram

All right. Unfortunatelly, I put most my damaged cm9 into the trashcan. But here are three MACs of damaged cm9s and R52

CM9: 000B6B4D4311
CM9: 000B6B3759B4

R52: 000C420500DF

canram

like i mentioned in my topic, other cm9 cards are running fine for weeks on same tower, only CM9 going dead is the 2,4Ghz 10db Omni (wich is at highest point in tower ) Also a Pacific Wireless Omni ????? Yes, you won´t have this problem with a cheap linksys WRT54G (broadcom chipset). I have also so...

canram

Today I changed my Omni Pac Wireless 12 by a 120° sectorantenna. Unfortunatelly it seems damaged because with this sectorantenna, signalstrength was about 25 dbm less than with the Omni Pac Wireless 12. Therefore, I had to change back to an Omni Antenna. But this time I don´t use the Pac Wireless Om...

canram

I lost each of my cm9 only during stormy or rainy weather.

canram

I hat this problem a year ago at one location (Pac Wireless 12 dBi). As I could not find the reason, I replaced the AP-Hardware complete (no aeheros anymore). Now I have same problem with a Pac Wireless 12 dBi at a new location. Everything ist grounded very well. Within the last 5 days I lost 3 CM9s...

canram

Sure. The Webproxy on the Mikrotik-Box.

canram

Yes you´re right, but how should I use policy routing, if my source-machine is a webproxy?

canram

Here are my tracking-configs: ---------------------------------------------- ip firewall connection tracking> print enabled: yes tcp-syn-sent-timeout: 5s tcp-syn-received-timeout: 5s tcp-established-timeout: 1d tcp-fin-wait-timeout: 10s tcp-close-wait-timeout: 10s tcp-last-ack-timeout: 10s tcp-time-...

canram

Hello, I´m using Router OS 2.9.17 as PPPoE Server with transparent Web-Proxy. All outgoing request to port 80 with source address of the Web-Proxy is mangled with a routing-mark "webtraffic". Behind this PPPoE-Server there are two ADSL-Lines. Via Policy-Routing, I loadbalance alle Webtraff...

canram · Perhaps, we´ll see pppoe-relay in RouterOS 2.9.10. I hope so !

Perhaps, we´ll see pppoe-relay in RouterOS 2.9.10. I hope so !

canram

I´m also using pppoe-relay on all my CPEs. It´s a very usefull tool and very easy to integrate. I also would like to see this tool in future Router-OS Releases, because EoIP really decrease performance. @Mikrotik: Please think about integrating pppoe-relay :D !!!!! As rastod already said: "why ...

canram

Yes, but most customers are using SIP, not IAX. We need a method to handle SIP.

canram

I think its a difference in the used drivers

canram

Hello,

is it possible to mangle all FTP-Traffic (really all). I want to use policy routing and route all FTP-Traffic via one special gateway.

Thanks, canram.

canram

Hello Cmit,

latelay I tested Elsa Quickstep Pro 1000 but this card also does not work. Can you please tell me exactly the name of your working ISDN-Cards?

Thank you.

Have a nice day,
canram.

canram

Hello Christian,

do you already have any new results?

Regards,
Stefan.

canram

According to http://www.mikrotik.com/docs/ros/2.9/gu ... list#1.2.8 Fritz Card should be supported and winbox shows the driver correct loaded.

A few days ago, I tried ELSA Quickstep 1000 PRO PCI. But same problem.

canram

Does anyone have a running isdn-machine with RouterOS2.9?

canram

Hello, I´m using RouterOS 2.9.8 on an Pentium 3 650 Mhz with an Intel Pro NIC and a Fritz-PCI ISDN-Card. I want the machine to deal as ISDN-Router, but the ISDN-Connection does not work. RouterOS successfully loads the FritzPCI-Driver automatically. Both ISDN-Channel exits. If I configure the dial-o...

canram

I don´t want to act the RB500s as PPPoE-Server because I don´t want to seperate the IP-Pool, the PPPoE-Server gets his clients-IPs from. By the way, yesterday (sunday) there was also big traffic and many simultaneous sessions on my PPPoE Server and I experienced the same problem. I have several APs ...

canram

Sorry, OK, I found it. You can set rx-antenne and tx-antenne separate. Great.

canram

I could not read anything about choosing the rx and tx antenne. As I can read, nstreme2 is simply a sort of bonding two wlan-interfaces running nstreme.

Where can I configure, which antenne for tx and which for rx?

Thanks.

Stefan.

canram

Ist ist possible to do Nstreme2 with 2 antennas, but one antenna only for rx and the other antenne only for tx?

Kind Regards,
Stefan.

canram

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:16 pm Post subject: what exactly do you want to optimize? Is something not working? Slow? High latency? Or do you simply ask IF you can optimize anything at all? I have no real, serious problem. Nearly everything works fine. But if simultaneous sessions on the PPPoE serve...

canram

Is there nobody else with a similar scenario?

_canram_

canram

Hello all, I want to collect a few tuning tips for a centralized PPPoE-Server (Mikrotik OS) terminating several EoIP-links to distributed Wlan-APs (Mikrotik OS). What I did is following: 1. EoIP-Tunel from each Public-AP to the PPPoE-Server. 2. On the Public AP, the EoIP Interface is bridged with th...

canram

why do you use Eoip ? Because in RouterOS no pppoe-relay exists and I need to transport Ethernet-Packets (pppoe) via a routed network to the centralized pppoe-server. what hardware do you use ? All APs and bridges are RB500. The PPPoE-Server ist a 2,4 GHz Celeron with 512 MB Ram and INTEL-Nics. i w...

canram

Yes. All used components are Mikrotik and all are running Router OS 2.9.5.

canram

I´m running five accesspoints (RB500) on five different locations. All are connected to a centralized PPPoE Server (via EoiP). Customers are connecting to the accesspoints and "dial in" into the PPPoE Server. Everything works very fine. But if the pppoe-server reaches about 45 - 50 session...

canram

Hello,

I want to disconnect all my pppoe-Users every sunday night. I´m a newby in RouterOS-Scripting.

Can anyone help me in writing a script, disconnecting all pppoe-users, please

Thank You.
_canram_

canram

Do you plan to integrate also WPA with Radius-Authentication (WPA-Enterprise).

canram

Hi,

has the status about researching802.11i and WPA2 changed.
Thanks.

Have a nice day,
Stefan.

canram

Okay, so I´ll upgrade soon.

Thank You.

canram

Hallo, If you´re connected via Mikrotik PPPoE Server (2.9RC7) it´s not possible to download Files bigger 2 GB. Download simply stops at 2GB. This is no Limitation of my Client-Filesystems, as connected directly to the Internet (not via Mikrotik PPPoE), this download is successfull. Ist there perhaps...

canram

Yes, I have exact the same problem after upgrating from RC7 to RC10. All my clients used WPA-PSK with AES encryption. After upgrade to RC10, no client is able to register by using WPA-AES encryption. TKIP instead still works. My clients are Windows-XP SP1/2 machines and Linux-machines using WPA-Supp...

canram

I know, but I don´t have a spectrum analyser reaching up to 6 GHz. Therefore I thought, I could do something similar with MikrotikOS, like LCOS from Lancom.

canram

Is it possible to make a wireles trace (or something else) to detect possible radar impulses or other disturbances?

Thank You.
Stefan.

canram

Oh, thats a pretty project for next saturday which will take the whole day :( I cannot believe, that lack of "SNR readout" or "noise floor readout" is a chipset limitation. Lancom uses Atheros chipset too, but they have a "SNR" and "noise floor readout". Even ...

canram

Thank you for your answer.

Is there an easy way to check out those interferences?

canram

Hello,

I´m just wondering wether horizontal or vertical polarisation is more suitable for p2p-links.

Thanks so far.
Stefan.

canram

Yesterday I had to restart this five systems twice, to get ospf working again. But I have this failure only on routers with wireless interfaces. OSPF on my machines without a wireless interfaces is working very well. I´ll observe this just a few more days an than switch to static routes because with...

canram

Meanwhile, I heard from two further 5 GHz P2P-projects (all in germany), having the same problem in the last 48 hours. On of them, using Lancom-components, upgrated his firmware to solve this problem. The new firmware is optimized for radar problems. Is there anybody else, observing simliar probles ...

canram

Hello, The last two days, two of my P2P-Links went down. Signalstrength used to be about -75 dbm. Suddenly, signalstrengh continuously got more worse. - 1 hour later: 82 dbm - 2 hours later: 88 dbm - 3 hours later: 92 dbm - 4 hours later: no link. One day before, we had a big thunder-storm. Therefor...

canram

Hello, I´ve got an p2p link with 2 rb500 (each a 23 dBi antenna). Monitor on the rb500 configured as stations shows me following values: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ status: connected-to-ess band: 5ghz frequency: 5520MHz tx-rate: 36Mbps rx-rate: 36Mbps ssi...

canram

Hello danh@tbc.net,

can you please tell me what MTU changes you did?

Thank You,
Stefan.

canram

Same problem. This morning, on 5 of 9 rb500 running 2.9rc7, ospf did not do anything. It seems that ospf nearly chrashed on all routers at the same time?! Only way to get ospf work again was restarting all 5 systems. I realy hope, that Mikrotik will manage soo to get ospf work properly. Kind Regards...

canram

@cmit Yes. This is exactly what I did last night. I fixed the datarates of all p2p-links and now I have a stable ping on all p2p-links. Thank you for this suggestion, anyhow. @lastguru: There´s always the possibility to fallback to the basic-rate (6 mbit). I have no problmes with disconnects, as I c...

canram

Hello, I have several 5 GHz direct P2P links, varying from 3 up to 6 km. Signalstrength, depending on distance, is different from -65 to -77. Each P2P-Enpoint is a RB500 with a 23 dBi Panel antenna. Each link itself is very stable! At the moment, I´m not using Nstreme. But pings to each P2P-Endpoint...

canram

Great !

canram

In accordance to another thread (http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=3865) I would like to know, if real TPC is planned for future releases instead of only reducing tx-power by 3 dBm.

Anybody who knows the roadmap?

Thanks, Stefan.

canram

Ok. I see. Is it planned to implement TPC in future releases?

canram

cannot find the thread. Do you have a link for me?
Thank You.

Stefan.

canram

I have a 3km P2P Link using Routerboard 500 with AR5413 Cards on each Side: Here´s my Configuration: - Antenna on each Side: 23 dBi Panel + 3m Ecoflex 15 Koax - Band: 5GHZ - Scan-List: 5470-5725 - DFS: radar-detect - Regulatory domain: germany - Antenne Gain: 22 In Germany I´m allowed to use TX-Powe...

canram

Okay I´ll try new wireless-package.

canram

I want to establish a P2P-Link between two RB500 at 5 GHz. Each Board with AR5413 Mini-PCI-Cards. For testing, I configured the first RB500 as bridge and the second RB500 as station. Everything works fine. But If I turn on Nstreme on both Router, the link cannot be established anymore. Log shows an ...

canram

This seems to work. Thank You.

But is RouterOS really regulating 30 dBm EiRP

canram

I´m using RouterOS RC7 and want to establish some point2point-Links. In Germany, TX-Power of 30 dBm is only allowed with TPC, DFS in a frequency-range of 5470 MHz to 5725 MHz. But if I choose frequency="regulatory domain" country="germany" and DFS="radar detect" RouterO...

canram

Very Good. Thats an equivalent or even better solution, because the customer does not need to configure an outgoing proxy.

canram

I´m living in germany. The biggest provider is german telecom. And I´m shure that german telecom is not going provide bundled lines in near future. It´s like an old dinosaur. Individual whishes of customers are unknown

canram

MT in my opinion is not only a router. Look at the feature list

web-proxy, firewall, tunnels, vpn-server, ...

A sip-proxy is only a litte missing feature and I´m sure Mikrotik will add a sip-proxy anytime.

canram

hmmmm, yes

Unfortunatelly, I have not the possibility anymore, to have a try

canram

@STEN:

As I also wrote, I solved my problem by changing the provider of one line.

Your theory is very interessting. But I´m wondering if it´s possible to manage to IP´s with the same APR-Entry.

canram

Sorry, I cannot give you an answer to this questions, because I´m blocking all p2p-traffic

canram

I use Routerboard 500 with MT as ADSL-Router on two UR2 ADSL-Modems.

canram

Yes, this is a possible workaround. But ít´s no real solutions, because I lose the chance to get also a failover-scenario.

But I already solved my problem. I changed provider of the second line

No everything works an I`m happy

Thank you for your tips.

canram

Yes, you´re right. Many Proxies are running fine behind RouterOS. But what I´m looking for is a router with integrated proxy. If a customer wants to use two or three ip-phones behind an masquerading router, he don´t want to run a second machine only for sip-proxy.

canram

Are there any plans to integrate a Sip-Proxy-Deamon like http://siproxd.sourceforge.net in MOS? This would be very usefull for many people doing NAT/Masquerading.

canram

canram

Same or similar Problem here. I´ve one MT-Machine connected via two DSL-Lines (both NAT) to the Internet. I want my Proxyserver behind the MT to use the second line and all other traffic the first line. I´m working with Routing-Mark for Destination Port 80 and Policy Routing and first it seems to wo...

canram

There´re no really subnets, as my provider ist working with host-routes. i.E. First IP. 217.91.124.122/32 Second IP. 217.91.124.156/32 Gateway for Both: 217.5.98.168 I don´t think that my provider will change subnets, as the complete order and ip-assigning is an automatic process. I think I will hav...

canram

Today I got a second adsl-line from my provider. No I have two adsl-lines with static IP. What I want to do is load-balancing between the two dsl-lines. My problem is, that both adsl-lines use the same gateway (as it´s the same provider). Therefore I´m not able to enter several default-gateways, bec...

canram

Yesterday, I tried following:
- WPA-PSK between 2.9 RC2 and OpenWRT+WPA-Supplicant
- WPA-PSK between 2.9 RC2 and Odysse-WPA on Windows XP.

Both worked fine with TKIP and with AES.

Yet, integrated WPA-Client of Windows XP does not work with 2.9 RC2. But this does not really matter

canram

I tried it several times with TKIP and several times with AES. But I did not try it with an commercial Client like Odyssey Client. Is it possible for you, to test WPA with the Windows-XP Built-In Client? I´ll try RC2 amd Odyssey this evening on my XP-Boxes and WPA-Supplicant on my OpenWRT-Box. I´ll ...

canram

Does anyone succeed in getting WPA-PSK work with 2.9 RC1? I tried several Clients. - Windows XP SP1 - Windows XP SP2 - Linksys Wrt54G running openWrt Every Client is trying to connect to the WPA-Running MikrotikOS-Machine but does not get any connection. MikrotikOS-Logfile shows permanent connects a...

canram

Thank you in advance.

_canram_

canram

I can report that MikroTik AES works with LinkSys wireless devices... How did you configure your linksys. I tried to use a wrt54g in client mode and mikrotik-os in ap-bridge mode both using aes. The wrt54g connects fine to the ap. But the performance is very weak. Ping responses within the same sub...

canram

Sure. You´ve got an email ,)

canram

That sounds good.

What I want to do is to run Mikrotik RouterOS in AP-Mode with AES encryption and use an 802.11i Client-Bridge on the User(Client)-Side.

This would be a more secure alternative to WEP or just WPA.

canram

Hello,

does someone know if RouterOS AES encryption is compatible to 802.11i AES?

Thanks so far,
canram

canram

Is not anybody out there having operational experiences with pppoe over longer distances?

_canram_

canram

I want to build a routed wireless backbone with some accesspoints for the custommers. Within this backbone there´ll be one pppoe access concentrator. All accesspoints have an EoIP-Tunnel to the pppoe access concentrator, therefore, the custommers should connect the pppoe access concentrator. Are the...

canram

ALSO most residential grade DSL/Broadband routers support PPTP.. I know the big names do, Linksys, Netgear, etc.. and its becoming more and more standard on residential routers. Many routers support PPTP. But I don´t know any non expensive consumer router that supports "MPPE-Encrypted" PP...

canram

My users are using a simple WLAN-Bridge which only support WEP or WPA. Behind this WLAN-Bridge, they currently use a common DSL-Router doing PPPoE. Mostly, those cheap DSL-Routers do not support any kind of encrypted vpn tunnel. Therefore, the bridge must do the encryption. Many of my users a consid...

canram

Any news about the integration of WPA-PSK in MT RouterOS? Can I expect WPA-PSK support still this year?

Thanks so far.

Have a nice day,
canram

Search found 84 matches

Problem with http-downloads via loadbalanced lines

Mangeling FTP-Traffic

Could not establish ISDN-Dial-Out

Nstreme2 with different tx/rx antennas

Optimizing PPPOE-Server / EoiP Scenario

Many PPPoE Disconnects

Script for disconnecting all PPPoE-User

PPPoE Server does not transfer files bigger 2 GB

Wireless Trace

horizontal or vertical polarisation for p2p-links ?

Link-Failures

5 GHz Link Failures / Trace possible?

Difference between signal-strength and tx-signal-strength

Ping Latency

Real TPC planned for future releases?

TPC - Regulatory Domain - Wrong TX Power?

Nstreme (1) with RB500 and RC7

How to choose 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz (DFS,TPC)

SIP-Proxy ?

Load Balancing two adsl-lines of same provider with same gw

2.9 RC1 - WPA-PSK

RouterOS AES compatible to 802.11i AES

Required Quality for PPPoE

WPA-PSA