[...] Had you access to some information about mikrotik no using MIPS never more? Quite the opposite: both of the big 100G devices MikroTik has recently introduced are MIPS-based. They're classed as switches (CRS) rather than routers, though, so CPU performance never was their major focus. I think ...

I would still use the device's block diagram. Many do have just two routing interfaces plus an internal switch. Sometimes the internal switch is more capable, and you can have soft routing (where every routing decision is handled by the CPU).

Yeah, no real POE options in that density, even though they do make the boards for it (netpower16 is a CRS3xx with 16 RJ45 POE PD). Strange part about the non-rack variant of the CRS326, it seems to be lacking any ability to put rackmount ears onto it. I'm not looking to mount it in a rack, but it a...

Never understood tech channels on youtube with English title, English description and alien language. There was a while when YT would automatically translate some of that (especially titles) to english. I don't know if they stopped doing that. I also don't know if that is the case with this channel.

This CCR2004 has no hardware-switch chip, so all L2-Features have to be CPU-emulated. It seems this is the best the CPUs can do. In the test-results (https://mikrotik.com/product/ccr2004_1g_12s_2xs#fndtn-testresults), 25 Firewall-Filter-Rules will also decrease the througput to ~4,5GBit. But as of ...

Ok, I did some more testing and that is exactly the issue. If you enable hardware offloading, it breaks VRF completely. I was able to reproduce this behavior disabling and enabling the feature. If enabled, all VRFs will utilize the last configured routes you have in your routing tables. If disabled...

8-16 port switch - that would put Mikrotik right in the nose of extremely high end switches i love MikroTik but we have to look at the big picture, i think we are very far from high end, in high end we are seing about 32 x 100g in 1 rack unit in a standalone switch, in modular chassis there are 32 ...

Azzurro I would say your chances of seeing L3HW support on RB5009 and CCR2004-16G-2S+ are very high, say 85% Mikrotik wouldn't spend a dime on hardware they were not going to use ;). Hell they even removed the damn beeper from new products to save a few cents ! (I will forever grieve said beeper) I...

I know on my cap ac, using it as a pure Access Point was a bit frustrating at first, since the device tries to operate in a "router" mode, and the quick webfigs didn't make things any better. The default settings (or whatever I clicked around with in webfig/quickWebfig) almost always made ...

Are you able to connect to Winbox via devices that are directly connected to Audience via WiFi or downlink ports (meaning, by not traversing the uplink to the CCR/CRS/etc)?

I have no real solution nor suggestions. Do they work in the CRS305 with RouterOS booted?

I don't have anything helpful to give.
When you wireshark sniff a windows/edgerouter setup, does it actually transmit the https://host:port in the clear or does it translate it into an IP address?

Does the D-Link support passive POE out? If it does, then it should be able to power the switch.

... it might be hard to get anything , except IOT devices, with a 10MBit port. Probably nothing uses 10Mbps these days now, the story about 100Mbps is different. My observation is that all devices capable of wake-on-lan put their ethernet ports to 100Mbps mode, the reason is very likely power consu...

I am going to stop investigating as I don't have enough tools to test bandwidth. * My ISP fiber line is offering 2.5Gbit downstream, which is far from 10Gbit. * I am using 2 x 5Gbit USB3 dongles. Testing from one dongle to another shows 3.5 Gbit speed, not 5Gib. * One computer with 10Gb network car...

AFAIK, no official mPCIe spec includes USB 3.0. For USB 3.0 speeds (now called USB 3.2 gen 1, 5Gbps), it's electrically similar to PCIe 2.0 in some aspects, so I suspect most would have just used PCIe unless there were good reasons not to.

Is that the queue or all 64 enumerable SR-IOV ports?

Sounds good gotsprings, what rekeying (assuming wpa2) numbers seem to be optimal??? It was 2 clients on my network. They started to act up when that Ruckus Update came along over a year ago. With Mikrotik I would see hourly disconnects. On a WAG (Wild Ass Guess) I changed the time to 10 minutes. Th...

Netgear also sells its slightly cheaper predecessor, the MS510TX P P. Main difference is slower ports and a reduction of PoE power from 60W per port to 30W per port. UP is PoE++60 with 4x2.5, 4x10GbE, & 2xSFP+. PP is PoE+ with 4x1GbE, 2x2.5GbE, 2x5GbE, 1x10GbE, 1xSFP+. Otherwise, both end up be...

That would be somewhat strange ... Why do you find it strange? Back when linux kernel 3.3 was condidered modern, it was still sensible to build a kernel with minimum supported feature set ... e.g. support for single CPU (core), support for 4GB RAM (take away address space for hardware and one ends ...

They are dual core. RoS 6 could only see one of them, so they were sold as single core - but RoS 7 can see (and use) both of them.

That would be somewhat strange, though I wonder if other 3236 devices are affected - CRS305 and various CRS328 devices?

Another tech recommended Netgear. https://www.netgear.com/support/product/MS510TXUP.aspx Netgear also sells its slightly cheaper predecessor, the MS510TX P P. Main difference is slower ports and a reduction of PoE power from 60W per port to 30W per port. UP is PoE++60 with 4x2.5, 4x10GbE, & 2xS...

Capac6E )))))

With that name, maybe they can one-up Ubi and only have ax on the 6GHz band, leaving 2.4GHz on n and 5GHz on a subset of ac wave 2 features (first two Unifi 6 products had ax only on 5GHz, with a much older radio for 2.4GHz).

Either way, we hope for a better future.

Please let everyone know if 7.1.1 does resolve this. I don't have nearly as many VLANs, but I'd still like to know!

Would resetting a device do the same thing as a fresh install? It did not resolve the issue on my Hex S, though I'm willing to try again (and with more depth, since the first time I reset it, it somehow kept my prior configuration).

I keep on running into this problem. I initially saw it after upgrading my CRS309 to 7.1. It is consistently occurring on my CRS309, Hex S, and cAP AC (all 7.1.1 now). I never ran into this issue in the past, so I'm curious as to why it's happening now. Reading @tangent's post, I can confirm my init...

I ran into this after upgrading to 7.1. I just force refreshed (ctrl+f5 in most browsers), which clears the cache and reloads everything. Seems to have resolved it so far, for me.

I had an odd issue across Firefox and Edge (Chromium) when upgrading to 7.1 stable via the upgrade channel. WebFig didn't quite work properly, and clicking on webfig would revert the selected button to Quickset, and it would bring up the Interface menu across the entire screen. However, the side pan...

Also depends on what you want to do with it. Are you talking about linerate routing across all 24 ports? Or a router that only has to NAT/Firewall/DNS for a single 1Gbps uplink, and everything else is just switched behind the NAT? CRS3xx could do the latter (moreso in V7, if setup properly). Linerat...

+IN replaces the old +PC label, but I thought the CRS326 +IN lacked rackmount ears?

In that case, my fanless setup is: CRS309 (8 x SFP+, 1 x GbE RJ45) CSS610 (2 x SFP+, 8 x GbE RJ45) Connected via a single SFP+ <--> SFP+ connection. One could use a SFP+ DAC instead. If more fanless RJ45 ports are wanted, the CSS610 can be replaced with either the C S S326-2S+ or either C R S326-2S+...