He knows that, for sureIf you did not realize it either, then we were together on that, so you can join the club.
Do you use PiHole as DNS which uses ROS DNS as upstream DNS?I also use adlist with StevenBlack from PiHole.
https://download.mikrotik.com/routeros/<version>/CHANGELOG
You can try to automate with PlistBuddy (/usr/libexec/PlistBuddy) in script. PlistBuddy is macOS provided CLI tool for editing .plistsI also want to figure out how to update the UUIDs in the .plist per build too. I'll hopefully get it this week.
Depends how lucky attacker is, just mentioned as possible edge case, from 7.18 without possibility of user enumeration it is even lesser probability for brute force.How many years can brute force continue undetected with a random 254 characters password???
:execute {:for a from=1 to=5000 do={:rndstr length=9999}}
patchelf --set-interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 <winbox_binary>
Neither will I anymore, but new customers not experienced with MT devices and ROS (as I was when purchased my device) will not know about this trap.I would never buy a new 16MB device. Others can do what they like...
binwalk --run-as=root -e OpenWrt.mtd5.bin
True, but creating and implementing such graphics elements for Web to mimic desktop creates greater costs and at the end it is all about money (unfortunately)...If anything, the web interface should mimic the desktop one, not the other way around.
If such is the case you will still have issue printing it after is generated from export command. Use :parse command as @Amm0 suggested.I figured out why, ROS v6 will only read files up to 4kb in size, any larger than that they just return blank
Already exists here: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... gIPAddressThank you. Would be helpful to put that information in the manual as I didn't find it anywhere. Apologies in advance if it already exists there.
It's is not just about security, TLS 1.3 have more optimal handshake, less round trips.As long as TLS 1.2 is still considered secure and ROS supports secure ciphers, I couldn't care less. Everything else is compliance BS.
maybe OP wants this -> viewtopic.php?p=1105740 (and guess who is OP of thisThis is a mikrotik forum bud.......... not applications for fancy routing.
Good suggestion! It will cover user access security if internet access is on any interface.Maybe stupid question, but couldn't the (safe/complex/random/whatever) password be asked during the netinstall process for those (older) devices that still have the blank one?
Maybe convenience is not right term in case when such HW issues are present and requires a lot of effort to eject SIM including risk to damage it, convenience can be for eg. laziness when simple push-to-eject SIM is available.Choose: convenience or security ?
...In some cases removing SIM from slot is not convenient ... then providing simple script to netinstall with command which disables lte1 interface is the way...