I can see a massive increase in latency spikes and loss after upgrading to v7.18 on multiple CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS

Same problem at CCR1072 and v7.18.1

edited: Nevermind. Likely not related.

I've upgraded, and notice that my ipv4 NAT is masq to the same IP regardless of my srcnat rules. The BTH dynamic NAT seems to be marked as "unknown" interface and it eating all of the masq? https://i.imgur.com/A7s8G4S.png I'm going to create a backup/regular wireguard user with full acces...

I've upgraded, and notice that my ipv4 NAT is masq to the same IP regardless of my srcnat rules. The BTH dynamic NAT seems to be marked as "unknown" interface and it eating all of the masq? https://i.imgur.com/A7s8G4S.png I'm going to create a backup/regular wireguard user with full access...

I've ordered one of these from a local Australian supplier. I'll see if there are any other major changes.

I was waiting for a CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS refresh, so I'm glad to hear this exists... while we wait for a major hardware replacement

I'll put it off for a few months for pray for a refresh, but the CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS is what I'm looking for.... So one of those for the routerOS replacement
then might grab a CRS510-8XS-2XQ-IN for 25Gb between the nodes or something fun.

I'm about to move from a 1GB to 10GB uplink at my colo... so I'm looking at the current hardware range for 10GB routers/switch My current router is a RB5009UG+S+IN connected to the uplink and then my 3 node proxmox cluster. Looking at the current range of SPF routers.. The CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS looks l...

Is it safe to disable/re-enable the BTH remotely? or should I physically be there and reboot/upgrade to 7.15 at the same time.

I woke up today and the BTH wireguard connections from my admin/jumpbox to my router has stopped working. winbox vpn error.png Notice the existing BTH users list seems empty and trying to add another one is prompting the service is disabled.. when it is listed as enabled? My "breakglass" s...