I was able to get IPTV working with ODI stick. Details here: https://github.com/Anime4000/RTL960x/issues/214 In short: Since ODI doesn't do VLAN mapping that it gets from OLT, VLAN IDs with ODI stick could be different from those listed everywhere on the internet: 6 for internet, 2 for IPTV, and 3 ...
I finally got an answer from support, it looks like the S+RJ10 10GBASE-T modules don't forward TX pause frames You do not see Rx-Pause on CRS310 device due to S+RJ10 module. Tx-Pauses transmitted by the CSS610 is received by the S+Rj10 module, but it does not forward it up to the RJ45 link. Do you h...
RouterOS implements flow control with off as default; read: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Ethernet Enable rx-flow-control & tx-flow-control on MikroTik ports to forward ONT pause frames is worth consideration. I know, TX/RX FC enabled an all ports involved doesn’t make any impact. ...
Make no mistake, I don't consider such a thing fine at all, far from. However, requesting an update yourself in an already open ticket, is something you can always do. But not filing a ticket does yield in no response forever. This is always true. The more persons file a ticket, the more the chance...
And long would you be waiting if you had NOT send in a ticket ? Eternally ... You can post a question in your ticket to ask about the status. wow can't really argue with that kind of logic.. I guess in your book it's fine to not receive any acknowledgment of an open ticket for a month because no ma...
So it looks like TX Pause frames generated on one end do not register on the other end of the link no matter what combination of SWOS and RouterOS I use. In my latest tests, I have the following connection chain : Linux @ 2.5G via RJ45 on CRS310 -> S+RJ100 @10G on CRS310 -> S+RJ100 @10G on CSS610 ->...
for 1. I believe that's the correct behavior. According to the docs https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/Ethernet the pause frames are received on the Mikrotik port (showing up as RX pauses) from the NAS (generating TX pauses) on the other end. rx-flow-control (on | off | auto; Default: o...
So I have an extra CSS610 lying around and decided to use it instead of the CRS310. Installed two SFP+ RJ-45 transceivers on the new CSS610, one for connecting to the old CSS610 (@10G) and the other to connect the Linux box (@2.5G). Starting with fresh SwOS configs on both, only change was to enable...
Hey thanks for the quick and detailed reply! I've enabled Flow control TX/RX at each port on every switch along the chain, including the 2.5G interface on the Linux box and I'm seeing no difference. Lots of TX Pauses on the CSS610 port -> CRS310 and no RX or TX Pause frames anywhere else, including ...
Hello, I have a CSS610-8G-2S+ connected to a CRS310-8G+2S+ via S+RJ10 on CSS610 to RJ45 port on CRS310, at 2.5Gbe via CAT6. On the CS610 I also have a PFsense internet router connected at 1Gbe and on the CRS310 a Linux box connected at 2.5Gbe. When I run a speedtest from the Linux box, downloading r...