Hello for all..! I have CCR2004 in my company and I want to create a dedicated QoS (Quality of Service) path for the SIP phones in my company to ensure smooth and uninterrupted communication between IP phones. This setup will prioritize their bandwidth, preventing other network activities from consu...

First thing. check your configuration, whenever there is a "*" (asterisk followed by a (hex) number, it is a reference to *something* that was deleted/moved/renamed and that RoS cannot find anymore, it is a placeholder for something that was there but doesn't exist anymore: /interface lis...

Merry Christmas to you too! I have only skimmed your configuration but I think the problem is that you have used a routing rule for scr-address 172.16.0.0/24 which looks ONLY at the Server 2 routing table ("action=lookup-only-in-table"). Problem is there is no route configured for Server ...

Hello my friends, Merry Christmas to all of you, and I hope you have a great weekend..! I have the following scenario: I have MikroTik CCR2004 with two WAN connections: WAN-1 connected to Ether-1 from ONU-1 WAN-2 connected to Ether-13 from ONU-2 For WAN-1, I have two public IP addresses, and I am us...

I recently discovered some weird behavior with some grandstream VoIP phones. Sometimes the incoming calls are not working properly and the phones do not ring. The phones are connected to the German provider 1&1, whose servers show some weird behavior I alrady discovered. When registering at sip...

So In this case, just using firewall rules can effectively separate the two subnets from each other? What exactly you mean by separation of the subnets? You wanted each of the two LAN subnets to be reachable from the internet, and to send its own traffic to the internet, from another public address...

I applied that, and it worked perfectly. Now, if I want to route traffic for bridge1 through x.x.50.24 and traffic for bridge2 through x.x.50.25, is it enough to use routing rules? You don't need even that - the interface is the same for both addresses, and the gateway is the same as well, so your ...

First of all, for what you describe (distinct dst-nat rules per public IP), you do not need to create a macvlan interface, it is enough to attach both public addresses to ether1 and simply let some of your dst-nat rules match on dst-address=x.x.50.24 and some on dst-address=x.x.50.25 . You only rea...

Hello.. Sorry if my English is bad.. Sorry if my question Sound silly for you .. My ISP has provided me with two public IP addresses on one interface (ether1, representing my outside WAN connection). I want to create dstnat rules for some devices using the first public IP address, x.x.50.24, and sep...