MikroTik

tonymobile

After upgrade some BSU for test, i have problem with mac authentication on my centralized radius.

I'm come back to 6.44.3

Mikrotik team, please fix bug.

tonymobile

After upgrade some BSU for test, i have problem with mac authentication on my centralized radius.

I'm come back to 6.44.3

Mikrotik team, please fix bug.

tonymobile

Updated a CCR1009 and RB4011 without any issues. Great work MT!
Now please make us happy with some BGP improvements in 6.45

Quote!!

is it true that for the BGP sessions, RouterOS use only one core?

tonymobile

why not just change the country to "no country" instead of switching to regulatory??? Let me guess... Because someone set 'country' value for some reason? :) Of course, because as long as the rules were respected, many ISPs like me respected them, now that the collapse is now total, we ha...

tonymobile

why not just change the country to "no country" instead of switching to regulatory??? Let me guess... Because someone set 'country' value for some reason? :) Of course, because as long as the rules were respected, many ISPs like me respected them, now that the collapse is now total, we ha...

tonymobile

You are right that there could have been two ways to adjust the inaccurate setting for some users. We chose to adjust towards compliance, not towards incompliance. If user has set a country, he possibly wanted to be compliant already. When will you understand that it is now impossible to conform? U...

tonymobile

You are right that there could have been two ways to adjust the inaccurate setting for some users. We chose to adjust towards compliance, not towards incompliance. If user has set a country, he possibly wanted to be compliant already. I don't think that a user using superchannel with a country set ...

tonymobile

You are right that there could have been two ways to adjust the inaccurate setting for some users. We chose to adjust towards compliance, not towards incompliance. If user has set a country, he possibly wanted to be compliant already. When will you understand that it is now impossible to conform? U...

tonymobile

Hi Team,
Server Down for ROS Files download??

tonymobile

tonymobile - Such features will never be added into 6.41.x version. v6.41, v6.42, v6.43, etc. will have new features. v.6.41.x, v.6.42.x, v.6.43.x, etc. will include only fixes. That is the whole point of bug fixes only versions.

Thanks

tonymobile

And where are these features in 6.41.3? I do not understand. *) wireless - added "realm-raw" setting for "/interface wireless interworking-profiles" (CLI only); *) wireless - added initial support for "nstreme-plus"; *) wireless - added support for "band=5ghz-n/ac&...

tonymobile

Why has this feature not been implemented for NV2 clients? +1. We need a NV2 background scan please. Being a TDMA protocol, that won't be happening unless a secondary radio interface is added to the routerboard: laws of physics. As well as no longer the spectral History command on AC Radio! Dear Mi...

tonymobile

Rather than continue to design futile stuff, try to reactivate the spectral-History function on AC radio, which is now also present in the world's worst routers! Mikrotik Team, are losing much ground to your competitors, want to talk about GPS synchronization? Meditate people, meditate and listen to...

tonymobile

It seems clear that mirotik clearly does not want to invest on wireless, MT now wants to sell just ccr

tonymobile

To further clarify this: In earlier versions, special license was needed for non-standard frequencies. Not since v4.17. Now this license is only needed for custom channels. This license is free of charge, and only your signature is asked (once). So how do we sign out signature. Do we have to email ...

tonymobile

+1 for spectral-scan!

tonymobile

Hi to all, excuse me for my poor english. I noticed a problem on the SFP modules Mikrotik mod. S-85DLC05D that there is' a problem on the value TX Power of the ones dated 05/06/14 and the ones dated 08/13/14 (See attachments) How can I fix? This is a firmware problem? The modules are mounted on CCR ...

tonymobile

See what your CPU intensive: /tool profile The problem is a big difference in the settings between 6.xx and 5.26. Probably ipsec, if so, proceed as follows: Disable security package where ipsec: /system package disable security /system reboot Then in the export settings: /export file=conf Turn on t...

tonymobile

Ok, my device is 433AH and 1 Wlan module. I ha see in tool/profile, ipsec module from 70 to 90% !!!! :shock: I'm sure that if upgrade to the latest version, fixes the problem but because it happens ??? I'm downgradind some of my devices because I think that the TDMA (NV2) is more stable in older ver...

tonymobile

When have downgraded from 6.20 to 5.26, cpu 100%

Any idea to solve?

tonymobile

You have to have an account on the Mikrotik site. You go to the last tab ("Account") and login. Select "Support contact form" (right menu column) and tell Mikrotik that you want to activate the extra channels feature on your account. They will send you a legal form to print out,...

tonymobile

RB 711-5Hn with AR5008 Wireless Network Adapter (rev: 1) not supported!!!!
Yes, the manual describes this:

Currently only Atheros AR92xx based chips support non-standard center frequencies

Hello Normis, how active the advanced channel???
I want to test it on some PTP.

Regards.

tonymobile

RB 711-5Hn with AR5008 Wireless Network Adapter (rev: 1) not supported!!!!

tonymobile

They are already implemented, but you need to acquire a (free) license extension from Mikrotik in order to use them. Also, they are not supported on the latest 9xx routerboards.

Hi nkourtzis, thanks for reply, how and where can I buy the license?

Regards,
Tony.

tonymobile

Hi to all,
I know the date of implementation of these functions?

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wi ... d_Channels

Regards.

tonymobile

Observation, all equipament with trafic much (up 50 mbps) , 3 interfaces network stop respond. It is now clear that the problem is on the LAN chipset. My question: is it fixable? This model has significantly affected the credibility and quality of service to my customers. I'm thrilled. I already se...

tonymobile

My observations show that this thing happens ONLY when ethernet interface sends allot of traffic(80-150Mbps). If that same ethernet ONLY receives that same traffic there is no problem. Like this: siteA--(RB435G_A)----wireless----(RB435G_B)--siteB one way real world traffic (the other way is through...

tonymobile

2 cm distance but without antenna. these two things are both very bad ideas :) attach some kind of antenna, and increase distance :P Ok Normis, i have attached a Antenna to MMCX and now work fine. Where i can purchase Yagi 760-780 MHZ Antennas??? Now i must made test on the Way!!!!!! See this http:...

tonymobile

XR7 is not supported i have 2 cards, the client doesnt registed with the AP, i tried all the frequencies on the chart, nothing worked. i contract MT, they told me they need to test it, and they dont have cards. i contacted Michael Ford from ubnt.com, he said he will test it and come back to me, sin...

tonymobile

Hi to all, excuse me for my poor english. I have 25 Users on a AP at 8 to 15 km distance. The AP is situated on 1500mt of moutain with many many Watts of Network Radio and TV. I have solved interference on ether1 with a unique Rb 433AH with 3 R5H Radios, 1 radio for ptp link (Nstreme) and 2 radio fo...

tonymobile

Hi to all, you can set the minimum guaranteed bandwidth (CIR) for each client in routerboard? Another important question: I use ubiquiti CPEs and this don't support layer7 to prioritize VoIP packet, i have to create marks and forward but in not enough, you have other ways to avoid inconvenience on V...

tonymobile

It 'hard to understand this, when they are only a few days I use mikrotik!

I fear that I will have to solve alone.

Thanks to all equally.

tonymobile

Is possible to send me a setting to create a transparent bridge with max throughtput without filter or limitation with 2 rb411a and cm9 minipci ?

Thanks.

Tony.

tonymobile

Thanks!!

tonymobile

Hi to all, is possible to pair my CPEs Proxim model 5012-SUR-WD with RouterOS and RouteBoard 433AH???

This CPE work in WORP protocol.

Thanks.

Tony.

tonymobile

Thanks,

is possible to have a setting to create a bridge with max throughtput without filter or limitation with 2 rb411a and cm9 minipci ?

Best regards.

Tony.

tonymobile

Hi to all, excuseme for my poor english. Is possible to download a guide for winbox and routerboard 3.10? I am a new user for this products, usually i install Proxim QB, BSU and CPE but i want to try new brand. I have a Wisp with 400 user, my society have purchased many RB433AH and many RB411A with ...

Search found 37 matches

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.45.1 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.44 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.43.8 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.43.8 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.43.8 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.43.8 [stable] is released!

Re: v6.43.8 [stable] is released!

MIkrotik server ROS Down

Re: v6.41.3 [current]

Re: v6.41.3 [current]

Re: Client Background wireless scan

Re: Newsletter 78 with 1GBPS WIRELESS PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Re: AC equipment and spectral scan problem

Re: 30MHz Basic issue on RB2011UAS ROS 6 RC1+

Re: 802.11ac spectral scan

MikroTik SFP Module

Re: Downgrade to 5.26

Re: Downgrade to 5.26

Downgrade to 5.26

Re: Special Features Channel width on ROS v.6

Re: Special Features Channel width on ROS v.6

Re: Special Features Channel width on ROS v.6

Re: Special Features Channel width on ROS v.6

Special Features Channel width on ROS v.6

Re: Problem 435g routerboad version 5.7, Network Interfaces

Re: 10 Equipment RB435G presenting the same problem.

Re: XR7

Re: XR7

AP/Bridge with NStreme

MIR e CIR and VoIP prioritize to set In routerboard!

Re: How to create bridge???

How to create bridge???

Re: RuouterOS and Proxim 5012-SUR-WD CPE

RuouterOS and Proxim 5012-SUR-WD CPE

Re: New User for mikrotik products

New User for mikrotik products