no, just accept it : 2.4GHz is dead. Maybe you can get along with it somewhere in mountains, but in city...

let me apologize, of course there is no way how would I know this. I clearly stated in my post : "I THINK..." - once again, please accept my deepest apologies for this, I didn't mean anything bad. I was just plain wrong. We highly rate your RouterOS product, we bought several dozens licens...

mikrotik does not develop p2p filters, I think they use external filters from http://ipp2p.org/ This guy was first to report bitcomet encrypted headers detection.

I feel you are not based on competitive markets - in my country, nobody would even think about placing download/upload ratios, prepaid VOLUME of megabytes/gigabytes etc. Company like this would not exist for two months here. so, I decided to abandon following this thread with "no solution is an...

connection sharing is quite often not allowed: a) cable ISPs have legal conditions - on small cheap programs you can't share, on the most expensive ones you can. Many of them limit this possibility to one property as was said before = you can't legally share with your neighbor. They are loosing mone...

hey guys forget the java stuff, it's nonsense.

Do you know how to find / mark / distinguish / do something with packets that have TTL equal, lower or higher than some threshold? I didn't realize anything.

> it was something about the TTL of the packets - the number for TTL
> change when the packet pass the router.


yes, this would be relatively easy way how to find "sharers". How can we use this in mikrotik? I didn't find anything in firewall nor mangle.

directwireless, no update since 20th ? please, please...

90km single faster than 63km dual? hmmm.... sounds like interference or something else, but this is not "normal"

were these 2.4GHz links with g, g-turbo or just normal plain b mode?

do another thing : in /ip firewall filter, bind IP and MAC address combination (if IP address x.x.x.x doesn't have MAC y:y:y:y:y:y:y, then drop) and do shaping based on IP address only. This way it should work flawlessly.

normis you said:

> did you upgrade to 2.9.10 ? there the handling of many connections is improved


may we know what exactly is improved? There's nothing in changelog mentioning this. BTW, may we know the connection tracking table size in version 2.9.8 and later and before 2.9.8 ?

what is not detected? which p2p uses http protocol?

yancho, it has been said twice that shutdown is not an option and you come with this advice... in4ni, you don't have to be afraid at all. We have several routers that shutdown harddrives automatically and this feature can't be turned off (stupid compaq bios, there is power management disabled and st...

new info : we got pair of 5006X (=5413) chipset cards. Again, the situation is the same : as soon as we enable hardware compression, we get lower throughput. The actual performance hit depends on data pushed thru the link, but generally is around 25-40% compared to "compression=no" setting...

this should be easy: login to this "far away" server from some server or computer which is on the SAME subnet on ethernet as this faraway server - ie. if this is 192.168.0.1, login to it from 192.168.0.2 etc, ADD new IP adress to it, and do: /ip route print set -number-of-default-gateway n...

it works, but when you start pushing data thru it it breaks and stops transmitting/receiving (interface shows as running). Each time you run bandwidth-test, it fails after ten seconds when tries to transfer around 30Mbit/s both ways. 100% reproducible so this is bug.

> If you enable compression the MT as a client will no longer talk to the MT AP. Association but no data across the link... this is not true, we can enable hardware compression on all types of cards we use (from very old 5211, with decent 5212 and 5213 - the only type we miss is newest 5414 = 5006X ...

> While reading this topic I expected someone will finally explain how p2p > filering is used on MT and guess what, instead of that I jus saw people > waiting to piss on people who do not know. there are two basic things used for filtering, read here: http://ipp2p.org/ and http://l7-filter.sourcefor...

changeip, question still remains:

Then why when I use a software netlimiter 1k/sec for upload it doesn't affect download?

wook, your english is absolutely fine. 120Mbps... don't count on that, definitely forget RB532 and such platforms, you should be using full-blown ATX computers and CPU around 1GHz to be on the safe side (you don't need 3GHz P4 monsters). You can reach ~100Mbps with several AP/antennas, but you are g...

seems like I found something that could be helpful to Mikrotik: wireless AP Sparklan 1590, 500m distance, -55dB signal, 2472Mhz (13th channel), no problems with 2.8.27. After upgrade to 2.9.7, prism stopped working. Sparklan is Access Point because it is its natural mode, Prism card is mode=station ...

guys, do you now understand the difference? See what wildbill442 said? "I'm using 2.9.5 on multiple routers with no problems. That could be attributed to my experience with networks and mikrotik. I find some users on this forum who have problems with Router OS have no basic understanding of net...

FORGET IT. Nobody is able to help you with this, people here are lacking experience. YOU WILL NEVER PROPERLY LOAD-BALANCE SUCH A DIFFERENT LINKS (LATENCY + BANDWIDTH + PROVIDERS). YOU WILL ALWAYS HAVE PROBLEMS WITH DISCONNECTED SESSIONS, BROKEN DOWNLOADS, IRC/ICQ NOT WORKING PROPERLY, NOT TO MENTION...

anyone with SUCCESSFUL implementation of bonding on v2.9.6? Post your experience and configs, please - throughtput mode only (balance-rr or 802.3ad).