
do you use mt x86 with many nat/qos rules?
i understand that speedtest from ookla isnt prefect. but almost everyone use it.Speedtest mini is not an reliable speedtest.
Btest same as speedtest.
Why don't try an torrent?
please pm your email. i would like to start negotiations on the pricePrice is negotiable, depends on band and output power.
how much cost that converter? could you show how it looks like?I have ready transvertors for 10 and UP GHz working![]()
We cannot dismantle some live production links to show you bandwidth test like you want. So here is example with other link:
50/30 about 6km:
please give link to this testi saw in other forum a test with 3x3 mimo and he got 200~250 MBps halfduplex
this means that your link is WORST then common nstream dual in 802.11a turbo link. i had 7-10 times smaller pings at mt 3.30...Two chains, ping not exceed 20-30ms. I can try make sreen shot but I am not always on internet connection.
1 or 2 chain? Please show us pings at this traffic...Real 100mbit half duplex is arrived! This is real customer traffic not any type of b-test. I try replace RB600 at station side and I am sure i can get more then 100mbit in one direction!
please show us pings at tcp 65mbI have a 5km link with 2 r52n cards on which I only use single chain and Signal-77.
I total I went from a TP of 20mb to 65mb
please show us pings at tcp 70mbI applied similar changes to a 1km link and went from 70mb to 90mb with a single chain.
i add ip 10.10.10.1 to mt-ap, and 10.10.10.2 to mt-client to ether1 at mt's:eeh ..
1. Run test over vpls (test to ether ip - not transport/remote/wlan ip )
2. Test run on ROS not on pc with winshit
What nic do you use?I think, it should work. we have routers with one 1Gbit NIC, they route on speeds upto 750 Mbps, 60 kpps with CPU load about 30%.