Update: with no change to the original script or the RouterOS version, today the script is working again (returning a value for the best server).

Try it without the: \?limit=2 Thanks but without the limit it takes a much longer time but still provides no value for the new server. Without the as-value parameter this is the output (hopefully it helps finding out what's different in the JSON structure): status: finished downloaded: 6KiBC-z paus...

HI there! Is it just me or the script is no longer working? I mean, with the current code it provides an empty output, while removing the "as value" at the end it prints the full JSON. I guess something in the JSON structure has changed and the current script cannot locate the hostname any...

Same here with latest 6.44.3 on x86 RouterOS.

Regenerating the SSH keys solved the issue (and reboot wasn't necessary).

Thanks!

Hi, I downgraded the RB750 of my first post to RouterOS 4.11 and bootloader 2.27 (shipped with 4.11) and the used memory now is stable, few days have passed and looks like it does not increase anymore. Previously, with 4.17, there was a 500kB constant increase every single day! http://img9.imageshac...

Yes, I will try 5.2 (or newer) as soon I end the tests with 4.xx: I can't really believe all the 4.xx family has this bug and nobody has spotted it! I'm quite confident that there's at least a bunch of "stable" versions that are not affected and using one of them would be enough for me! Al...

Well, I'm trying with different RouterOS versions to find a 4.xx stable one without this bug, and I'll post the results of my search.

BY the way, so far no replies from Mikrotik support but I hope someone is taking care of this issue!

Hi, I opened a support ticket some days ago (#2011050266000218) regarding a memory leak on all our RB750 : day after day the "used memory" of the board increase constantly as long as there are just 3-4MB left and the board goes instable. Reboot solves the problem but then used memory keeps...

I upgraded an RB running 4.16 to 5.0 that had the NV2 package installed and when the router came back up it didn't have any wireless package enabled and lost all the wireless settings. Is there any way around this issue? I lucked out in this case because it was the local side that I upgraded, but i...

Ok, so please delete this topic!

Hi Normis, maybe you didn't noticed I'm using a 400Mbit microwave link: it's a 18GHz carrier grade device and those 400Mbit/s are real and effective, it uses 256 QAM modulation and was designed for our specific purpose, it's not a best-effort link! So, that's why I say the speed test is malfucntioni...

Thanks for your reply MRZ, but I hope you agree that a speed test that returns unreal values is quite useless!

And if I do not set any speed limits, the speed test returns wrong values, so you should agree it's not working properly!

Hi, I'm testing 2 RB1100 connected via a 400Mbit/s microwave link (carrier grade) with gigabit ports. When I start a speed test using UDP protocol from one RB1100 to the other one: - if I do not set a speed limit, the highest speed reached is quite wrong (about 60Mbit/s), looks like the test is not ...

Hi, I've just verified that two boards are not reachable if behind a bridged link with a Nv2 wireless link ( like the one shown by "himmi" in his post ): DEVICE A ............... DEVICE B - Station ................. DEVICE C - AP ........... DEVICE D RB1100 eth1 ---------- eth1---wlan1 >>>...

Hi guys, as I did for 802.11n protocol ( look at this post ), I post below some screenshots of my test link using Nv2. Compared to 802.11n results in the very same conditions and hardware in use, I got better results with this new Nv2 protocol expecially on fullduplex links (100Mbit/s instead of the...

Ok, below you can find the results of bandwidth-test using "both" directions! Highest UDP simmetric speed reached: 66Mbit/s stable on both downlink and uplink, CPU average load @ 30%, average ping @ 40ms http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/135/iw4eky7.jpg Highest TCP simmetric speed reached...

Hi guys, that's the result of my tests with 802.11n on Mikrotik hardware, keep reading for an abstract of results and images with settings. I started using the settings suggested by "exe" on the previous posts and make some changes to find the best tradeoff between stability and performanc...

Thanks, but I prefer to keep the discussion on this board, since it may be helpful to others!

Hi magnavox,
as far as I can see there are different clients with different MAC addresses.

PPPoE sessions crash also when our Nanostations and 5 CPEs try to connect, so I think is up to the AP-side...

Hi everybody, I tried searching on the forum with no luck so I wrote this post. Scenario : AP made with Routerboard (433AH, 532A or 600A) running RouterOS 4.5, two or three mini-pci cards (Ubiquiti XR2 and XR5) installed for every board. The radios in ap-bridge mode are in the same "bridge"...

Proper OSPF authentication is configured per interface where authentication type and key is specified, which you don't have. I would suggest to configure authentication on all OSPF routers the way it should be configured, then upgrade process will be smooth. Right, this is a good observation. But p...

iw4eky is right for sure. It' impossible to forecast this kind of behaviour and use in advance specific packages... I believe iw4eky is a very good mikrotik expert and if i were you i would invite him in china for the MuM for free. Guys, you know I love you, but MuM in Poland would be closer to me!...

Ok, but I was upgrading from 3.24 to 4.5 using common "combined package" and are both stable versions of RouterOS and there is no advice on this "strange" behaviour, so a common user would never be aware of what is about to happen. So if you don't agree on recognizing the arbitra...

Well, actually it is a bug, since authentication parameters change with no reason after upgrade, crashing all OSPF links that need authentication!!!

Hi everybody, in the last days I tried a test configuration before roll-out v4 upgrade to all my Mikrotik based network. Well, on every single Routerboard upgraded from 3.24 to 4.5 I found the same bug on OSPF : "authentication" parameter under Routing-->OSPF-->Interfaces-->Interface that ...