any idea? please

I tried with global-in global-out, but it's the same...

janis say: Global-Out or Interface HTB? There are two fundamental differences In case of SRC-NAT (masquerade) Global-Out will be aware of private client addresses, but Interface HTB will not – Interface HTB is after SRC-NAT Each Interface HTB only receives traffic that will be leaving through a part...

thanks i'll try, but in the janis slides, says that the use of globals it's needed when you use NAT, is not my case...

Hi, i'm running a pppoe server with 1000 users, and simple queues are messy, so im trying to set up a queue tree, after read the megis presentation, I have some doubts, this is my setup: /ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=forward comment="Clientes 512k" disabled=no new-co...

Hi,

I'm running ROS 4.10 in a x86 router with a couple of rtl8169 nic's, and i'm having a lot of packet drops, now I downgrade to ROS 3.30 and works ok, but i've to setup bgp in this router, need to upgrade ROS, wich version could work properly?


thanks!

my problem is similar, the worst thing is, the clients sometime can't connect, the nanostations show
ppp not connected, but no error in the log (nanostation or pppoe server)

thanks Jorge,

using split horizon, in my setup, I should set for example horizon 1 for ether2-ether9 and horizon 2 for ether1, is that correct?


thanks

thanks,

the idea is to do something like private vlans, where ether1 do the job as the uplink port

something like this could work?

Hi, I've this setup: pppoe server---------switch---------rb493[bridged ether1,2,3,4,5,6...](from ether2 to ether9 UBNT rockets as wds bridge where the clients connect) some clients, some times, can't authenticate in the pppoe server, like packets lost before reach the pppoe server. so how can I do t...

i dont have any now , my setup it is just with one ip that i got from my provider i actualy i got 5 static ip.

can you post your config please?

I think you're in the wrong post

can you post your config please?

the problem is, in the router (10.0.0.1) is the pppoe server and behind the ap's in the end are the clients, later I must replace the private ip's for a public pool, all the routers in the way act as brdiges with a managment vlan(172.16.0.0/21) and a a pppoe vlan, the ap's in the end (ubnt rockets) ...

Hi,

in this situation (attachment), where should I set proxy-arp in order to reach the ap's in the end? (the part inside the orange lines is repeted 4 times from the switch)

I already tried several configs, but I can't make it work ok



thanks!

sorry about my english..

i'll check that when back to the lab, but, when the rb493 was connected directly to the pppoe server (without the switch) I was able to reach 172.16.0.2 from 192.168.0.0


thanks!

but in the 192.168.0.0/24 network gateway I've a static route to reach 172.16.0.0/21 trough 192.168.0.2 (ether1 from pppoe server)

Hi,

here is a little extract of my network,

the situation is: from pppoe server I can ping 172.16.0.2, from 192.168.0.0/24 I can ping 172.16.0.1 but I can't reach 172.16.0.2 or any other router in that network...

thanks, what about the upload queue showing no traffic? it seems to be something wrong

Here is my actual config: /ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=forward comment="Clientes 512k" disabled=no new-connection-mark=clientes_512k passthrough=yes src-address-list=lista_512 add action=mark-packet chain=forward comment="" connection-mark=clientes_512k di...

I understand that I must set a rate-limit per client queue, but I ask about the rate-limit in the pppoe profile, it's seems to be redundant, have a dynamic simple queue per user and then limit again in the queue tree

or maybe I'm missunderstanding how the queues works...

thanks!.

I was thinking that simple queues "overlaps" queue tree, and what do you think about the queue types? about the limits I mean...


thanks guys!

And about the topic, why dont you set address-list on PPPoE server profile and then use it to make a queue tree based on mangle with that address-list. It will contain all the LOGGED client IPs from your IP POOL! So the queue tree will work only on the IPs being used at the moment and it will modif...

Hi, i've a (stupid?) question, i've a pppoe server with 900-1000 clients, I don't have any queue for limit or priorization, for now I've enough bandwidth for all the clients, but I want to start using QoS to improve the service... the question is, if I create a queue tree (pcq), in pppoe profiles I ...

edit

edit

thanks!

last question, i've to set wds as dynamic, right?

Hi,
i've a network with 400 clients (nanostation 5, nanostation 5 loco), the AP's are mikrotik in ap bridge mode( wds disable), but now I need some clients in wds mode, if I set the wds in the AP, the clients in station mode (wds off) still will connect to the ap?


thanks!