Hi, in ROS 6.49, there are some limit to max limit size? For example, 1GB or 4GB? Something like that? In queue-tree. (queue-type pcq)

I also have TX Drops in CRS317-1G-16S+. Hardware offload on. CPU load 0%. Only 5 VLAN's 3 SFP+ 10G no tx drops 2 Mikrotik S-RJ01 1GB a lot of tx drop (also try ubiquiti UF-RJ45-1G, same result) ROS 6.49.6 (also try ROS 7.x, and routerboard firmware.) Apparently it's the mix of 10G and 1GB. I read in...

There are a bug, when try to move many items at the same time in Winbox with mouse. Only get moved one. (sorry bad english) 6.30 versión x86.

I have a very large network with many clients, which pass all for an mikrotik on x86.... The management system (Billing), is written in PHP, and at times is accessed by many Administrators simultaneously, when happen many API requests, the mikrotik on x86, stop responding any request to API, but, st...

Thanks, was the nat rule :/ jeje. This is the best way to routing public ip range?

Hi, i need to set a router to manage a /24 publics ip address, but in the clients don't work... help. From my ISP... Network: AA.BB.CC.100/30 Gateway: AA.BB.CC.101 Public IP Pool: DD.EE.FF.0/24 In my Mikrotik... [admin@gate] > ip address print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic # ADDRESS ...

i don´t block .com or .cc or .net, only identify the request, then redirect all traffic of that user to a website, where a inform is infected with virus.

Because, along with other rules of number of connections, I can identify if a user has a computer infected with a virus. When the machine has a virus, this generates a lot of connections and DNS resolution requests like this: dbpiqlx.cc pdlcgjpf.com plhbhbwh.net xaplvuyw.cc iidllkvybl.cc olytatcn.co...

I modified the DNS pattern, to this:
And the domain's .CC are been detected, but need to know if this is written good, or will catch another domain not only .cc



PD: Sorry bad english!

Can someone confirm if the nat problem with realtek interface is fixed?

Hello,

We have just upgrade to v6rc3 x86 and our router stops doing nat. We only found one solution, go back to 5.21 to solve the problem.

Any other with similar problems?

Yes, same problem here. Interface is a Realtek.

In X86 now the interface (Realtek) is detected, but no traffic passes... i try reset configuration and nothing.

RC2 don´t have all network nic drivers. I upgrade 5.14 to 6 RC2. And one interface has not detected, i reset the configuration, and nothing. In System->Resources->PCI i see two interfaces, but in /interface have only one. So, i back to 5.21. :( My box is a x86 and this 0 03:02.0 Realtek Semiconducto...

I need that, sync two address-list every so often, some form? No idea how I ... Obviously they are two separate mikritok two different X86 ...

Messenger uses TCP 1863 port

Hi everyone... i need hellllppppp!!! :( I have this configuration: Linux squid 2.7 with zph enabled 1.- First RB450G: chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=Cache-HIT passthrough=no in-interface=ether1-gateway dscp=12 and traffic is back to the speed which determines the queue that capt...

Now the real bandwidth is 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up nstreme is really fantastic!

Here is the link, the real bandwidth is 3.5Mbps down and 1Mbps up. I will try put 2 antennas for side, in one XR9 for side.

Yes, I know that configuration nstreme and benefits but want to know if this setting makes any difference to use 2 antennas per interface.

I'm trying to make a link of 16 miles. With 2 RB411 and 2 XR9, I'll use 2 antennas per side, an antenna in vertical and horizontal. That is, RX-a/TX-b (A = Horizontal, B = Vertical) My question is this, really makes a difference to use two antennas per interface, and have different polarization to r...