Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 18 matches

by Brough
Thu Jan 04, 2024 10:54 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Single Area vs Multiarea OSPF
Replies: 3
Views: 3647

Re: Single Area vs Multiarea OSPF

Thanks Spudrageous, Two reactions - (not criticisms!): 1. Most OSPF tutorials and most of the (lesser # of) deployments I've seen ignore redundancy! I.e., they have a single ABR between each area and Area 0. We are very focused on no single point of failure. For this, you can stick two ABRs between ...
by Brough
Tue Dec 12, 2023 5:35 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: L4S support in routerOS7
Replies: 10
Views: 7264

Re: L4S support in routerOS7

What makes L4S superior to fq_codel and/or CAKE? A modified use of ECN supports congestion control algorithms that avoid queuing delays at the sender, thus eliminating the sawtooth variation in launching packets that you're likely familiar with. But it is a new architecture with the associated issu...
by Brough
Mon Dec 11, 2023 3:09 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: L4S support in routerOS7
Replies: 10
Views: 7264

Re: L4S support in routerOS7

How does one add votes?

I am at least very interested.
by Brough
Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost
Replies: 4
Views: 962

Re: RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost

I finally found the other thread. It's here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=149062
And yes, our problem is similar to at least one thing reported there.

I'll go through that thread in more detail...
Thanks again!
by Brough
Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:41 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost
Replies: 4
Views: 962

Re: RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost

Thanks. I don't think that's what's happening here. We have SNMP data every two minutes and we record CPU utilization for each core. For the most recent loss of access, the utilization values were 0, 1 or 2 % on each core, randomly distributed, right up to the moment when we stopped getting SNMP data.
by Brough
Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:30 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost
Replies: 4
Views: 962

RB4011 carrying traffic but access is lost

We have a problem that we've seen only with RB4011s. The router becomes inaccessible meaning it no longer responds to Winbox, SSH or SNMP, however it continues to carry traffic and there appear to be no customer problems. Power cycling the router restores normal operation. Our network has ~800 Route...
by Brough
Thu Jul 23, 2020 9:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Winbox filter icon doesn't work with firewall connections
Replies: 0
Views: 525

Winbox filter icon doesn't work with firewall connections

I've used the Winbox filter function in many other places but when I use it to extract a subset of the active connections, it returns nothing despite there being a few thousand entries that should match. At the bottom of the window, Winbox does appear to be selecting a subset of the entries, but it ...
by Brough
Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:38 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?
Replies: 19
Views: 6789

Re: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?

<...>, if your WISP grows enough you'll see that an OSPF structured design combined with BGP is a great advantage, I've seen so many networks that grows in many directions became really unstable (I used to work with IPArchitechs and I've seen networks in lots of countries at the world) EIGRP may be...
by Brough
Tue Apr 23, 2019 3:48 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?
Replies: 19
Views: 6789

Re: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?

1. 276 routers and 2385 active routes 2. 202 routers and 1338 active routes 3. 142 routers and 846 active routes The current networks are stable, even when one or two routers are flapping (due for example to a marginal radio link). On the other hand, our current success may or may not be helped by ...
by Brough
Mon Apr 22, 2019 3:44 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?
Replies: 19
Views: 6789

Re: Your experience with larger/diverse Area0 OSPF networks?

I'm also interested in other's experience with large single area OSPF networks. We have four independent OSPF area zero networks that were geographically isolated at one time but now overlap. One of these areas includes an acquired Siklu-radio-based network with extra capacity but few alternate path...
by Brough
Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:31 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?
Replies: 8
Views: 3459

Re: OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?

Yes we use BFD, with MikroTik default timers.

I'm assuming BFD is entirely local between two peers and doesn't relate to stability of the whole network. In any event, we've never had occasion to look at other than BFD defaults.
by Brough
Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:07 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?
Replies: 8
Views: 3459

Re: OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?

In a single ospf area must be not more than 100 routers I believe. I hope you using lsa type 3 between areas in order to save processors time to recalculate shortest path. With OSPF help you have to announce only tech nets. For large scale better use BGP. Well we have 600+ routers in our largest ne...
by Brough
Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:35 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?
Replies: 8
Views: 3459

OSPF - How large can a flat network grow?

We're an urban WISP with a dense mesh of wireless links and a router per building. I am concerned that, without paying attention, we have grown to 600+ routers and ~2550 routes in one OSPF domain. This network has a diverse mix of routers from CCR1036s down to RB750UPs. We're not having any OSPF pro...
by Brough
Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:15 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT
Replies: 4
Views: 1210

Re: Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT

But that means marking based on pre-NAT source address.
It's the public IP address range that determines which default gateway to use, so marking based on pre-NAT source addresses was what I was trying to avoid.
by Brough
Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:42 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT
Replies: 4
Views: 1210

Re: Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT

Thanks Pe1chl, but as I read the packet flow diagrams, SRC-NAT is done in PostRouting and after Mangle Postrouting. There doesn't appear to be any way to do SRC-NAT and then do routing. Am I missing something?
by Brough
Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:28 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT
Replies: 4
Views: 1210

Chose default GW based on SrcAddr after SRC NAT

We have a WISP network fronted by a CCR1036 that has two upstream connections - a 1 Gbps Ethernet link that was until recently our only upstream, and a 10 Gbps link that will be our only link once a transition is complete. We serve a mix of business customers who get public IP addresses and resident...
by Brough
Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF problems when MD5 authentication is in use
Replies: 4
Views: 4211

Re: OSPF problems when MD5 authentication is in use

Thanks Greg. That lines up with my (limited) understanding of MD5 authentication. We'll redo everything with 16 character authentication keys over the weekend. We've also deployed an NTP server and are putting NTP clients on each router. Of course that means, if our problems go away, we won't be sur...
by Brough
Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:29 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF problems when MD5 authentication is in use
Replies: 4
Views: 4211

OSPF problems when MD5 authentication is in use

Using v4.11 on a small and, so far, rather simple network (2 RB1100s and 3 RB450Gs) we enabled OSPF with MD5 authentication. Everything seemed to operate normally for 4+ weeks. Yesterday, we started getting MD5 authentication errors on one of the links. The error was "wrong authentication type....