MikroTik

marlowbg

I'm also looking to achieve this.

Any help?

marlowbg

Hi,

I have deployed 6.35rc29 few days back as advised by Mikrotik Support team and I can now confirm that it solved the issue.

Hope to see this fixes soon in the Current branch as I don't feel very comfortable running few thousand of users on a RC version

marlowbg

I found wireless-6.34.npk file in "Files" with size of 0.

Deleted it and after another attempt to upgrade - Voila! It works now.

I don't have any idea how this zero file has appeared at all.

marlowbg

Anyone having the same issue?

It's still persists in 6.34.3

marlowbg

Hi, I'm running Mikrotik x86 based as PPPoE server (NAS) and customers are authenticating through Radius. I'm not sure if the problem is specific to the version, but I'm right now running RouterOS v6.34.2 The problem is that my IP Pool, which is used to dynamically assign Private IP addresses upon P...

marlowbg

I'm having strange problem on 1 of my Mikrotik NASes. Currently running 6.32.4 and I'm trying to upgrade to 6.34.3. Going through System -> Packages > Download and Install - everything passes normally, I can see the .npk in "File" menu but after reboot it's still on the old (same) version....

marlowbg

I'm not having the MPLS package anyway... but having "ntp" package and really don't believe this should be somehow related to the issue.

What is your current RouterOS version?

marlowbg

Using Router OS on x86 platform v6.34.2 I'm observing that after running for some time (few days let's say) I'm having more than 2000 PPPoE connections, 648 of them are running=no which for me is Dead/Stale. Anyone having same issue and how they can be removed besides Manual removal? What is the rea...

marlowbg

For me the scripts provided above in the thread are the only solution for the Double Queue/Logins.

Have you tried to implement them?

marlowbg

I was suspecting that the issue will not be limited to only Winbox usage, but explicitly asked MT support, and they confirmed it's only Winbox :) but anyway I hope that this topic here will help more people to know that actually it's not limited to Winbox, but also Console + Webfig. Btw, what is the...

marlowbg

Hi Dude, It's good to see someone else also aware about this issue. It's strange to me how Mikrotik R&D team are not finding a way to either fix it or disable the View that is triggering the issue. Almost all cases when you use this View on a NAS that is working since 2-3 days the issue is trigg...

marlowbg

HI,

I'm ready to use only x86 based solution if I have a way to stabilise it.

Why do you think the older version and especially 6.29.1 will resolve my issue?

marlowbg

Issue keeps on happening on both CCR1072 and the x86.

Still no positive results and even no recent replies from Mikrotik Support.

What are the users of Mikrotik doing in such situations?

marlowbg

As per last communication from Mikrotik support 2 days back: 1. The issue is well known old bug but unsolved for now. 2. It’s happening when someone accessing PPP->Active Connections through Winbox and maybe together with some other unknown condition because not every access of PPP -> Active Connect...

marlowbg

Unfortunately still there is no solution for this issue and it's strange to me if someone else is not getting it.

We suffer from 10-15 occurrences

Support is saying that R&D team is working on the issue, but there is no visibility on the progress ...

marlowbg

I have opened communication with Mikrotik support team.

Hope to get resolution fast as it seems that it's some software related issue/bug.

marlowbg

Strange enough,

how is it running under Linux, with same SFP+ transceivers that don't want to work under RouterOS?

marlowbg

I don't think it's a Network related issue, because 1. Some of the users (50% of them, that are direct on the Huawei Switch through fiber) were previously running on other NAS (Linux based) again on PPPoE and were having no issues of such kind. 2. On reboot of Mikrotik, issue is immediately resolved...

marlowbg

Problem happened on 6.33.3 on the x86 NAS, now I have downgraded to 6.32.3 Network is simple. 1 Data center, where 2 NASes are connected to Huawei S6700 switch. Some of the users, are directly connected on the same Huawei, on a Vlan. Other part of the users are through Vlans that are going through P...

marlowbg

I have even installed 1 more NAS that is based on x86 platform, but again same problem occurred after around 30 hours of running. I'm now running the 2 NASes (one ccr1072 and second x86) in parallel and have created supout on both when everything is fine, and when issue occurs will create second one...

marlowbg

Hi,

firmware is 3.27

The 200 customers that are connecting are split on 5 different Vlans, and when the issue Starts, All users on all Vlans are experiencing the issue... When I reboot the CCR1072, it's immediately resolved.

This is the reason I suspect the CCR1072, and not something else.

marlowbg

Hi,

3000 users online is fine, but how much traffic they consume?

I'm right now running 200 users and 1 core reaches 80%, 3-4 Cores are at 10% and rest are 0 or 1.

Do you think that if 1 core reaches 100% is actually a problem and some service, for some customer degrades?

marlowbg

Hi, Authentication happens through Radius. In PPPoE Profile, "Only one" option is set to "Default". In normal circumstances when problem is not triggered everything is smooth, but once problem starts ... nothing but reboot helps. Tested 6.33.3 and 6.32.3 versions, if this is what...

marlowbg

Hi all, I was using Supermicro based server under Linux for some period and the Lan card based on Intel 82599ES chip was working fine. Now I'm trying to use it with Router os for x86 and ether(s) are visible, but the ports are down, and I suspect that it's not "liking" the SFP+ module. I r...

marlowbg

We are using CCR1072 since few days, and the moment we connected around 100-200 users on PPPoE we started experiencing strange problems 1. After few hours of normal operations Most of the users start disconnecting and connecting on every few minutes/seconds 2. Some of the users are showing as double...

marlowbg

Hi guys, I'm also testing CCR1072 for PPPoE. Using around 10 Ip firewall mangle rules to mark specific traffic and allow higher speed for it and of course Dynamic Simple queues per user for Internet speed limits. So far with approx of 200 PPPoE sessions connected and around 150-160 Mbps of traffic, ...

marlowbg

Hello,

I also experience the same problem. Can somebody tell us how to solve it?

marlowbg

Everything is working except when customers are with PPPoE. Of course I enabled Use ip firewall for PPPoE, pppoe connection is not encrypted, but it seems that this rule /interface bridge nat add chain=dstnat mac-protocol=ip dst-address=192.168.0.2/32 action=redirect is not working for when packets ...

marlowbg

actually when i tried second time there was no problem with many packets... so i couldn't investigate more... Chupaka, actually i want to src-nat all the customers from 10.11.12.0/24 network with other network for example 10.11.112.0/24 so when they reach 192.168.0.2 i will know who is who, and i kn...

marlowbg

10x Chupaka when i added only the rule you suggested, actually a strange think happened: When I send one ping packet from Pc that is in the network 10.11.12.0/24 to 192.168.0.2, on the 192.168.0.2 machine I received hunderds of packets with ICMP echo requests. (i am using tcpdump on 192.168.0.2 beca...

marlowbg

please, any ideas? can i grab the traffic in the bridge that is with dst 192.168.0.2 and src-nat it with 192.168.0.1? Actually i tried this but didn't work... add action=src-nat chain=srcnat comment="" disabled=no dst-address=192.168.0.2 src-address=10.11.12.0/24 \ to-addresses=192.168.0.1...

marlowbg

on NAS, you should add a route to 192.168.0.0/24 via 10.11.12.5 the problem is that i do not have access to the NAS. My idea is to make customers connect to the Server by using the mikrotik ip firewall in bridge mode. Please advise how I can reroute the traffic that is generally going to the NAS (w...

marlowbg

Hello over there, for some days I've been working on a solution on the following case I have network setup like this: Internet <-> Router (10.11.12.1/24) <-> MT (in Bridge Mode)< - > Switch < - > LAN Customers (10.11.12.0/24) And this MT that is in bridge mode is actually RB750G. This is the port co...

Search found 33 matches

Re: dst rate limiting

Re: Stale (dead) PPPoE connections

Re: Version upgrade/change not happening

Re: Stale (dead) PPPoE connections

PPPoE server - IP Pool IP addresses exhausted due to stale entries

Version upgrade/change not happening

Re: Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Stale (dead) PPPoE connections

Re: Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Re: Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Re: Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Re: Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Intel 82599ES 10Gig card and SFP+ modules compatibility

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Re: PPPoE + Shaping for 10000+ clients on CCR-1072

Re: Strange issue with CCR1072 and PPPoE with both 6.33.3 and 6.32.3

Intel 82599ES 10Gig card and SFP+ modules compatibility

Total PPPoE crashing with CCR1072 and x86 - With all RouterOS 6.3x.xx versions available

Re: PPPoE + Shaping for 10000+ clients on CCR-1072

Re: UPnP and external interface with multiple addresses

Re: Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic

Re: Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic

Re: Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic

Re: Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic

Re: Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic

Wierd setup. How to use MT in bridge to redirect traffic?