MikroTik

Copper

There is no NTP package in the all_packages-smips-6.42.zip (hAP mini, hAP lite)

Copper

I support this request.
It would be great.

Apart from Centos-7
Arch Linux Preparing To Deprecate i686 Support

Copper

ROS 5.24 x86 with runnign PPTP vpn server on it. Two bonding interfaces: /interface bonding add arp=enabled arp-interval=100ms arp-ip-targets="" disabled=no down-delay=0ms lacp-rate=30secs link-monitoring=mii-type1 \ mii-interval=100ms mode=802.3ad mtu=1500 name=bonding1 primary=none slave...

Copper

Variable is linked to user

Copper

No.
It does not help.
Return is empty.

ROS 5.20 x86

Copper

How to get global variable value via ssh from outside ROS?

In ROS -

> :put $shastatus;
100
>

From outside -

# ssh -i key user@router ':put $shastatus;'

#

return is empty

Copper

*) pcq - fixed possible crash;

It seems that the error is still present.
We are witnessing the router crash on ROS 5.8 x86.
(router with 400 Mbit pcq traffic)

Copper

ROS v5.7 on Intel "Sandy Bridge" works great!
With Intel network adapters (E1G42ET and E1G44HT), exceptional performance! (shaper & vpn)
Integrated on-board network adapter does not work, as warned.

Copper

normis, how about support Intel Sandy Bridge platform in x86 ROS 5.6 ?

Copper

Is x86 RouterOS 5.6 works properly on Intel Sandy Bridge LGA1155 platform?

Copper

Can you recommend a good, free TrafficFlow analyser that runs on Windows?

Choose from http://www.networkuptime.com/tools/netflow/

Copper

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Traffic_Flow

Copper

I am sorry for being such a noob but I can't find where this unofficial version is (/share/)

Link to pre- versions you may get by sending request to support@ if you explain why you want this.
Here on the forum, you will not get the link to testing build.

Copper

If you use SNAT in the same router with shaper, then you may - chain=forward action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=subscr01 passthrough=yes src-address-list=subscr01 chain=forward action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=subscr01-up passthrough=no out-interface=ether1 connection-mark=subscr01 chain=f...

Copper

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Traffic_Flow

Copper

They would have to make/get a driver that would work on all x86 CPUs.

It does not happen. Other equipment requires different drivers.
Hundreds of drivers are part of the system, but when you start the system only those loading that match your hardware.

Copper

so, if it's e1000, then it's enough e1000 is a basic driver, he will work with all network cards. But it will not use all their hardware capabilities and in this case makes no sense to use server versions of network cards. e1000e - uses some of the hardware possibilities 82563/6/7, 82571/2/3/4/7/8,...

Copper

How about 82580 ?
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/detail_ ... ldID=13663
Is igb driver present in ROS v5 ? Or only e1000 ?

Copper

adrianatkins, i want to control the temperature of processors Intel Quad/i5/i7, but not on AMD Geode.

Copper

Temperature sensing depends on there being a temperature sensor on the Board.

If the board has not got one, you can't magically make one in software.

Linux kernel driver coretemp permits reading temperature sensor embedded inside Intel CPU
without sensors on a motherboard.

Copper

Add coretemp kernel module for x86 ROS.

Copper

My problem with the shaper resolved by replacing the network card.
Losses at the interface was not, CPU load was low, but the network card was faulty.
x86-based selection and testing equipment for the ROS is an important matter.

Shaper was not guilty.

Copper

Is snmp working when running full bgp table, and just for monitor interface traffic?

I do not use full bgp, just 2 peer and default route, with that, SNMP interface counters works fine.

Copper

What channels do you work?
You tried to pass through ROS pcq-shaper the flow of more than 100 megabits?

Copper

if you have limit-at=10M, pcq-rate=1M and huge traffic in that queue for particular user, packets will be dropped - PCQ will shape/drop it by pcq-rate, HTB's limit-at value will not affect the situation I've said a hundred times - subscribers do not approaching its pcq-rate ! I even brought a pictu...

Copper

If you still want to test, create two PCQ-queue and make sure that limit-at in Queue Tree does not work. Enough to make the same priority and let the traffic through both the queues. After that, try changing priorities, you ensure that the limit-at not working. The second thing - the calculation of ...

Copper

and what if you change pcq-limit to, for example, 1000? Я устал издеваться над своими абонентами и проводить на них тесты. Совесть уже заела. Тестируйте сами, если интересно. Но вообще-то это работа Mikrotik. Жаль что никто из компании даже не удосужился хоть что-то сказать и дать совет по поводу п...

Copper

Look at one stream with
kind=pcq pcq-rate=1000000 pcq-limit=100 pcq-classifier=dst-address pcq-total-limit=15000
Its one file downloading via http from server near the router (not from Internet).

Copper

I test RC3 - seems PCQ works even worse then in RC2.

Copper

Chupaka , I have works fine on v3.30 too. Just test v5. ... Even though the packet rate is small, below the limit-at , multiple drops occur and rate of sub-streams like a sawtooth form and is not approaching its pcq-rate . In v5 i`ve never seen that bandwidth of PCQ-queue once approached to its max...

Copper

what type does that rule have?

kind=pcq pcq-rate=500k pcq-limit=75 pcq-classifier=dst-address pcq-total-limit=20000
kind=pcq pcq-rate=1M pcq-limit=75 pcq-classifier=dst-address pcq-total-limit=20000
kind=pcq pcq-rate=2M pcq-limit=75 pcq-classifier=dst-address pcq-total-limit=5000

Copper

27k packet drops within 5 minutes, although none of the limits are not exceeded and sub-streams is not approaching its pcq-rate!
On RB1000 v3.30 nothing like this was not observed.

Copper

how can one repeat that behaviour? Create 2-4 PCQ queues in Queue Tree and test rate on sub-streams and look at drops. One queue works OK, but if they are several, and the traffic goes through them at the same time, the problems begin. Even though the packet rate is small, below the limit-at , mult...

Copper

No, the PCQ error is present - http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=46206 I thought that the case is not the optimal settings, but no. PCQ still does not work as expected. And I noticed that immediately after reboot PCQ works about well, but over time begins to run from bad to worse. Pr...

Copper

I talked about it - http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 08#p232808

Copper

No, i did`t open a support ticket.

Thanks for the workaround solution.

Copper

Chupaka, when

snmpwalk -v2c -c public ROUTER 1.3.6.1.4.1.14988.1.1.2.2.1.7

values changing.

but if request for one queue counter

snmpwalk -v2c -c public ROUTER 1.3.6.1.4.1.14988.1.1.2.2.1.7.16777218

values always the same.

Try.

Copper

Return values are always the same, they do not change!
They begin to change only when you run WinBox and open Queue Tree window.
actually, that was the second thing I checked... values were changing =)

No.
For PCQ queues they do not change.

Copper

run Wireshark, check for exact SNMP queries... I found the error ! Chupaka , try tshark -V -Ttext ip host ROUTER and port 161 | grep Counter64 Return values are always the same, they do not change! They begin to change only when you run WinBox and open Queue Tree window. That is why I've seen zero ...

Copper

Just tested.
Strange.

For monitoring i use ZABBIX and with v4 ROS all fine.
On v5 - was as I explained earlier (WinBox trick).

Indeed, snmpwalk in command line works, but ZABBIX did`t receive any data of Queue Tree OIDs without WinBox.
Miracles.
Where to find the cause?

Copper

SNMP OIDs of Queue Tree counters works only when i connect to router with Winbox and open window Queue Tree. As soon as I disconnect Winbox all OIDs of Queue Tree return null. I can't see such behaviour neither on rc2, nor rc3 (x86) But i see. On pre1-RC2, pre2-RC2, RC2. And we really need an RFC12...

Copper

SNMP bug still present. PCQ not work properly. clarify both please I test x86 - Seems like PCQ is OK. It was my mistake in queue tree config. SNMP OIDs of "CPU load" return null or not correct values. SNMP OIDs RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteDest not present at all (in v4 works fine). SNMP OIDs of Q...

Copper

SNMP bug still present.
PCQ not work properly.

Copper

Chupaka, i test PCQ in v5

Copper

Ping is OK.
But we use
pcq-rate=1M pcq-limit=75 pcq-total-limit=25000

Copper

any news about that?

on rc1 with bgp, bgp not crashed but snmp yes. no longer able to get interface statistics via snmp. its worked for about 12 hours and them stop responding snmp gets from cacti.

SNMP works when WinBox connected.
When disconnected, all SNMP OID return 0.

It`s in v5 pre-RC2

Copper

One GW, 150Mbit, above 500 subscribers (not all online simultaneously), PCQ shaper in Queue Tree. And subscribers got lower rate then value pcq-rate , although channel bandwidth have not even got over 75Mbit. What is more - when online less then 100 subscribers all fine, when more - subscribers rate...

Copper

I`m testing v5 pre-RC2 and seems that the PCQ does not take the real and current network bandwidth utilization, just divide the max-limit on the current value of the pcq-substream-count . This leads to an average flow rate is lower than the pcq-rate even if the real bandwidth has not yet reached the...

Search found 48 matches