Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 17 matches

by ginggs
Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:30 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Supported AT commands for R11e-LTE (wAP LTE)
Replies: 4
Views: 3847

Re: Supported AT commands for R11e-LTE (wAP LTE)

which exact AT command you want to use?
I am looking for a command to get USSD responses in plain text, see:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=129693
by ginggs
Sun Jan 21, 2018 6:44 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Supported AT commands for R11e-LTE (wAP LTE)
Replies: 4
Views: 3847

Supported AT commands for R11e-LTE (wAP LTE)

Where can I get a list of the supported AT commands for the R11e-LTE modem, as included in the wAP LTE kit?

Unfortunately, AT+CLAC is not recognized.
by ginggs
Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:22 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Decode USSD on wAP LTE kit [SOLVED]
Replies: 4
Views: 8799

Decode USSD on wAP LTE kit [SOLVED]

As per https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/LTE I am able to send AT commands to the built-in modem using the at-chat command, for example: [admin@MikroTik] > /interface lte at-chat lte1 input="AT+CGMI" output: +CGMI: "MikroTik" [admin@MikroTik] > /interface lte at-cha...
by ginggs
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:18 am
Forum: General
Topic: 4G LTE cards (4gen) support request on RouterOS 6
Replies: 49
Views: 39176

Re: 4G LTE cards (4gen) support request on RouterOS 6

More information in the thread 'Huawei E3276 problem' here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/l ... hread.html

Support for this type of Huawei modem was added to drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c in Linux kernel 3.6.11:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/l ... el/1649246
by ginggs
Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik with Iburst
Replies: 3
Views: 1750

Re: Mikrotik with Iburst

Does any one know if mikrotik supports USB iburst modems yet? I've just tested on an RB751U-2HnD with ROS 5.14, the modem appears as a USB device, but no driver is loaded: [admin@MikroTik] > /system resource usb print # DEVICE VENDOR NAME SPEED 0 1:1 RB400 EHCI 480 Mbps 1 1:5 Kyocera iBurst Termina...
by ginggs
Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

Re: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to

I see 5.2 has just been released, I will upgrade and report back. Upgrading to 5.2 has solved the problem. I first tried using my existing copy of winbox.exe from 5.1 and the new DLLs were downloaded and WinBox opened correctly. I then tried downloading a fresh copy of winbox.exe, clearing the cach...
by ginggs
Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

Re: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to

have u tried to clear the Cache under the connect button, i have found that sometimes the dll's/packages get corrupted during transfer. I have tried clearing the cache, also deleting the files in the appdata directory manually, and downloading a fresh copy of winbox.exe from the router, I even trie...
by ginggs
Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:51 am
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

Re: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to

I tried on a fresh Windows 7 64-bit installation (no AVG) and received similar errors: error4.png error5.png The roteros.dll file downloaded by Windows 7 is exactly the same as the file downloaded by Windows XP SP3. I ran vbindiff on the files and found that the segment of data that occurs at offset...
by ginggs
Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

Re: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to

I copied roteros.dll from my Windows XP SP3 installation as roteros-winxp.dll to my Ubuntu installation and found the md5sums are different. graham@azureus:~/.wine/drive_c/users/graham/Application Data/Mikrotik/Winbox/5.1-3384108182$ md5sum roteros*.dll b2b3f11cdad5133c731785bddc77360e roteros.dll 4...
by ginggs
Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

Re: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to

Doing a virus scan of the Winbox application data directory shows that AVG is convinced the roteros.dll is a 'corrupted executable file' and that it is a 'potentially dangerous object', although it doesn't quarantine or delete the file. error3.PNG Below are MD5 sums of the WinBox plugins from ROS 5....
by ginggs
Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1
Replies: 9
Views: 17925

roteros.dll not a valid Windows image since upgrading to 5.1

Since upgrading my RB411U from ROS 5.0 RC6 to ROS 5.1 I am no longer able to open WinBox on Windows XP SP3. The first time I attempted to connect, the updated WinBox DLL's were downloaded, and then I received the following error message: error1.PNG RouterOS WinBox: winbox.exe - Bad Image The applica...
by ginggs
Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

Re: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PP

The problem of the PPPoE connection on the bridge interface dropping when wireless clients connect and disconnect turned out to be caused by the bridge MAC address changing. The solution was to set admin-mac to ether1's mac address and auto-mac=no for the bridge interface, similar to this thread: ht...
by ginggs
Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

Re: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PP

Of course. http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Configuration_Management#Exporting_Configuration Thanks! :D Unfortunately upgrading to 5.0RC6 didn't resolve the problem as I hoped. I even tried downgrading to 5.0RC3, restoring a backup, then upgrading to 5.0RC5 but still I have the problem that eve...
by ginggs
Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

Re: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PP

I see ROS 5.0RC6 has just been released. I suspect that upgrading might fix my problem.

Is there any way to dump my complete configuration in text format so that I can compare the configurations before and after the upgrade (and in future in case I break it in Webbox again)?
by ginggs
Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:54 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

Re: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PP

Another problem that I was experiencing with 5.0RC3 was when using the PPPoE connection for internet instead of PPP, the PPPoE connection would drop and reconnect every time a wireless client connected or disconnected. This did not happen when I was using the PPP connection. I missed 5.0RC4, but whe...
by ginggs
Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

Re: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PP

so, the problem is: you cannot select a bridge as interface via Web, and you can do it with WinBox? That is correct. did you use Webfig or Webbox? This was with Webbox. Webfig allows me to enter anything I like in the 'Interfaces' field of the PPPoE Client, but the changes do not seem to be applied...
by ginggs
Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE
Replies: 8
Views: 3240

ROS 5.0RC3: Unable to selelect 'bridge' interface for PPPoE

I am currently testing an RB411U as a home router. I have bridged ether1 and wlan1 for the home network. Ether1 is plugged into an 8-port D-Link gigabit switch. I have a Huawei E1820 HSPA+ USB modem on usb1 and an iBurst UTD (PPPoE) also plugged into the switch. I was able to configure the ppp inter...