MikroTik

kolpano

Thanks Nick.

kolpano

Thanks for the answer Nick,

one question : The central Omnitik should be AP-bridge or simple bridge is adequate? Currently it is setup as brigde (not ap-bridge) but only one SXT is attached (for the time being).

kolpano

Hi to all, recently i purchased the Omnitik bundle with the 5 SXTs. I am planning to install them all pointing to the central Omnitik. The initial purpose is to pass SCADA data (max. 64 Kbps) per Omnitik and each SXT of the 5. I did a search in the forum as well as in the wiki but some details are s...

kolpano

Thank you all for your answers and support.

kolpano

you should sum only packets leaving the router - as they are successfully received, processed and sent out. These are test conditions and settings that are set - so the tolerance is set to 1% in our test setup and we are generating 2 independent streams, one in each direction. Janisk, i have only o...

kolpano

Janisk thank you for your answers, 1. I am using 5.15 RouterOS so it is very new. 2. If i sum the packets (going out and coming in) then i get very very close to the results that are mentioned at the http://routerboard.com/RB493AH (except the 64 bytes results for which i have questions mentioned in ...

kolpano

Hi to all, one more remark is that as the traffic is leaving from the Traffic Generator at Port 1 and the traffic returns back to the Generator (full duplex mode) then my results for 512 bytes and 1518 bytes are identical to the values presented in the http://routerboard.com/RB493AH . Is my assumpti...

kolpano

Hi , the RB493 config is pretty straight forward. [admin@MikroTik] > ip address print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE 0 2.2.2.1/24 2.2.2.0 ether3 1 1.1.1.1/24 1.1.1.0 ether1 [admin@MikroTik] > ip route print Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - ...

kolpano

Hi again, i used the following topology for my RFC2544 testing: TREND-UNIPRO-Analyser-Source<--------->Port-1-POE---RB493AH---Port-3<----------->TREND-UNIPRO-Analyser-Loopback-Device The test was based on L3 routing with the Source Analyser being in a different IP Subnet from the Loopback Analyser ....

kolpano

Hi Janisk,

i will use the POE and Eth2 and i will do again the RFC2544 tests.

I will let you know about the results.

Thanks.

kolpano

Thank you Janisk, i recall that the RB493AH has one port (the POE one) which is independent from the others. The other 8 ports (ETH2 - ETH9) are part of the same chip (ICPlus178C). I need to do some L3 routing tests , what ports do you suggest that i should use? For the time being i randomly chose p...

kolpano

Hi Janisk, thank you for your prompt reply. I looked into the info you provided me from the http://routerboard.com/RB493AH : "All throughput tests done with Xena Networks specialized test system and RouterOS v5, according RFC2544, with Ethernet frame sizes 64, 512, 1518 bytes. Each board is tes...

kolpano

Hi to All, recently i downloaded a one page PDF file that describes RouterBoard Performance Tests (it is attached) Routerboard_Performance_Tests.pdf . It is mentioned that the test setup was carried out with the use of Agilent N2X equipment. Can you provide me with more information concerning the Te...

kolpano

Hi,

thanks a lot. I upgraded to 5.8 and ethernet statistics are there.

Kolpano.

kolpano

Hi to all,

i am issuing the command : interface ethernet print stats in a RB-493AH with 4.16 RouterOS and it does not return anything.

Any ideas?

[admin@router] > interface ethernet print stats
name: ether1 ether2 ether3 ether4 ether5 ether6 ether7 ether8 ether9

Thanks

Kolpano

kolpano

thks Elgo

kolpano

In ROS "What’s new in 5.0" it mentions that there is a fixed problem – VLANs on bridge interface did not work It seems strange as in ver. 4.17 i had vlans as part of bridge interfaces that were working OK. Do they mean something different when they mention that "VLANs on bridge interf...

kolpano

Thanks Normis.

kolpano

Thanks Normis,

generally speaking it would be good to have the PDFs (as it can be combined with watching the videos), but if the presenter does not provide it , you are right , we can't do anything about it.

Kolpano

kolpano

Hi to all, it is good to see that presentations from Hungary MUM are coming in but unfortunately not all of them at least in pdf format. For example the following three presentationsare not uploaded in pdf format .The video is there but not the presentations in pdf form. # RouterOS tips and tricks b...

kolpano

Hi to all,

i wonder if the rest of the presentations that took place during the MUM 2011 HU will be available for downloading , because i noticed that only some of them are available.

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/MUM_2011_HU

Thank you,

Kolpano.

kolpano

Hi Belyivulk

i will give it a try. Thanks for the tip.

Kolpano

kolpano

Hi to all, My topology is the following: RB493AH---Ether1----Microwave Gateway---VLANS 1, 3, 5-----Microwave Gateway---Ether1---RB493AH I create 802.1q vlans on ether 1 and i send these vlans over a microwave device . Everything works OK (all VLANs pass correclty over the microwave link) , but there...

kolpano

Thanks Dennis,

i will probably go on with the current ibook version and probably when the second version goes live, there will be an extra discount for those that have purchased the first edition

Thanks.

kolpano

Thanks Dennis,

do you "see" it in some days , a month or more ?

I am asking this because i wouldn't like to spend money to buy version 1 and in lets say two weeks time to se that version 2 is available.

Thanks

Kolpano.

kolpano

Hi Dennis,

when the second edition of Learn RouterOS is going to be live?

Kolpano

kolpano

Thanks a lot Andy for confirming that.

I really appreciate the fact that you setup a lab to confirm my findings. Karma for you!

i am really stack now as i need to run ospf in vrf for a customer.

Mrz is there a possibility to have a solution on that and how soon?

Thank you

Kolpano.

kolpano

thnks

kolpano

Hi Andy,

in order to better troubleshoot the VRF redistribution issue, is it possible to provide me with a sample of a working config with two routers? Probably something is not right with import/export rules although i tried various configs.

Thanks

Kolpano.

kolpano

Hi Andy, RIP is working but it wold be better to have OSPF VRF working ;-) The topology is very simple: 10.20.64.0/23--Connected-to---Mikrotik-1 (10.20.94.1) <<<----OSPF-VRF---->>>Mikrotik-2 (10.20.94.2)----Connected-to-192.168.70.x There is also a static route in Mikrotik 1 pointing to network 192....

kolpano

Hi Andy, >you write there is an LSA for your static routes, so OSPF *IS* redistributing your static routes. correct? Yes correct there exists an LSA for every static route. >from a different OSPF router in your network: the destination IPs, are they reachable? is there an LSA? Actually there are onl...

kolpano

Hi Andy, the strange thing is that i run two OSPF instances which are identical in the same two mikrotiks , one is running within the General Routing Table and the other is running in the VRF. The general OSPF instance runs correctly but the VRF does not redistribute static and connected routes. The...

kolpano

Hi Andy,

yes the static routes are in the same OSPF VRF instance. Although i see that there are LSAs for these routes , they do not appear in the OSPF routing table.

Thanks

Kolpano

kolpano

Hi to all,

I tried RIP instead of OSPF in the VRF instance and everything works OK , redistribution and static routes propagate correctly with RIP. So the problem is only with OSPF at the VRF instance.

kolpano

Hi Andy, thanks for the info you provided with your previous email. I tried what you proposed and the results are the following: 1. As far as connected routes are concerned , it works. i added these connected routes in the appropriate area of the VRF instance (and added also the interface as passive...

kolpano

Thanks Azg.

The strange thing is the redistribution works fine with the MAIN OSPF instance. However redistribution does not work with the VRF OSPF instance. This may not be normal behaviour (probably a bug?)

I will try the dynamic OSPF nature and let you know.

Kolpano.

kolpano

Hi Blake, thank you for your answer.

in the post you mentioned there is an answer from azg that this VRF & OSPF & redistribution of static routes works.

I would be happy if you have the time to setup a lab and see if it works.

Kolpano

kolpano

Hi, thank you for your prompt reply, the topology is simple mikrotik1---two ospf Instances---mikrotik-2 . The problem is that VR routes attached to mikrotik-1 are not propagated to mikrotik2 and vice versa - this is only true for the vrf instance. The MAIN OSPF instance works OK and routes are learn...

kolpano

Hi, i have created two different OSPF instances , one is under MAIN routing table , the other one is under a different VRF. Between the two Mikrotiks there is ethernet cable and two VLANs , one carrying the main OSPF instance and a second vlan carrying the second VRF OSPF instance. The problem is th...

Search found 39 matches

Re: Omnitik and SXTs connection question

Re: Omnitik and SXTs connection question

Omnitik and SXTs connection question

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

RB493AH Performance Testing with Analyser

Re: Ethernet Stats not showing

Ethernet Stats not showing

Re: RoS 5.0 fixed VLANs on bridge interface that did not wor

RoS 5.0 fixed VLANs on bridge interface that did not work?

Re: MUM 2011 HU

Re: MUM 2011 HU

Re: MUM 2011 HU

MUM 2011 HU

Re: L2MTU question

L2MTU question

Re: First "ROUTEROS" Book Published

Re: First "ROUTEROS" Book Published

Re: First "ROUTEROS" Book Published

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

Re: TWO OSPF VRF Instances`

TWO OSPF VRF Instances`