I coudn't agree more :)

This is unsecure, coz dns names can be spoofed.
Second con is that in case of dns failure, the system will not be configured properly during restart.
Just my 2 cents :)

On both ends i have two neighbors on the list: - local station - 2-way - remote station - full it looks similar at both ends: router-id=10.0.0.2 address=10.0.0.1 priority=1 state="Full" state-changes=6 ls-retransmits=0 ls-requests=0 db-summaries=0 dr-id=10.0.0.1 backup-dr-id=10.0.0.2 route...

hmm, simple case: interface wlan0, i'm setting up ip, for example 10.0.0.1/24 it gives me auto added route to 10.0.0.0/24 via wlan0, and it is ok. now time for ospf. redistribute-connected: as-type-1 redistribute-static: no redistribute-rip: no redistribute-bgp: no i'm adding network 10.0.0.0/24, an...

There is 2-way connection in neighbours menu. I don't know what is wrong, ospf routes are propagated between routers, but everywhere i have DIO routes, as described before. I have tried between 3 mt routers (2.8.11 <-> 2.813 and 2.813 <-> 2.8.12), different networks, every time i have the same DIO r...

Ok, that i understand. But with ospf on network 10.0.0.0/24, it gives me invalid route to 10.0.0.0/24 network as i mentioned before. I understand, that in networks section I need to set up addresses of my backbone (or sub backbone). OSPF is working, but every ospf enabled station has doubled route t...

Thank signal for fast reply. dc route to 10.0.0.0/24 is ok, it was auto added after setting up interface ip address. but why routes to networks connected to local interfaces, exported by the ospf to rest of the network, are added localy (this one is invalid, coz it's dubled with dc)? below config wh...

After reading mt doc and cisco documents, i have quesion for somebody more familiar with ospf than me .. Eample network: mt1 - 10.0.0.1/24, lan 192.168.1.0/24 mt2- 10.0.0.2/24 lan 192.168.2.0/24 ospf area 10.0.0.0/16 after applying above config i have on mt1 dc route to 10.0.0.0/24 and dio route to ...