Today I just had the same issue on ROS 6.2, RB2011UAS-2HnD-IN. After logging in by webfig, it cleaned my filter rules and also changed some other settings (mac-server, mac-winbox, etc., visible in logs). How can I contact support? Thanks, Lukasz When I log in to webfig and click IP->Firewall->Filte...

Today I just had the same issue on ROS 6.2, RB2011UAS-2HnD-IN. After logging in by webfig, it cleaned my filter rules and also changed some other settings (mac-server, mac-winbox, etc., visible in logs). How can I contact support?


Thanks,
Lukasz

Hi, I have the following problems after upgrading from 5.25 to 6.0:
1. Graphs for Memory and Disk Usage don't work, when I click on them I get this error: ERROR: NO ACCESS!

This one is also true for me, no resource graphs available for viewing.

--
tig

Seeing v.6 at last is a nice thing, but it seems it was released too early. Anyone else suffering from "/system backup save" issues? The thing is that I had problems with earlier versions of RouterOS (v.5.2x) - it created broken backup files, which could not be restored. The behavior has ...

Seeing v.6 at last is a nice thing, but it seems it was released too early. Anyone else suffering from "/system backup save" issues? The thing is that I had problems with earlier versions of RouterOS (v.5.2x) - it created broken backup files, which could not be restored. The behavior has c...

I came across memory usage reporting error using v.5.22 with web proxy enabled caching to RAM. "System -> Resources" claim to have 4GiB free memory on my RB450G, while graphs say for example "Max: 345.17MiB (137.4%); Average: 124.61MiB (49.6%); Current: 66.73MiB (26.5%);". When ...

I came across memory usage reporting error using v.5.22 with web proxy enabled caching to RAM. "System -> Resources" claim to have 4GiB free memory on my RB450G, while graphs say for example "Max: 345.17MiB (137.4%); Average: 124.61MiB (49.6%); Current: 66.73MiB (26.5%);". When ...

I came across memory usage reporting error using v.5.22 with web proxy enabled caching to RAM. "System -> Resources" claim to have 4GiB free memory on my RB450G, while graphs say for example "Max: 345.17MiB (137.4%); Average: 124.61MiB (49.6%); Current: 66.73MiB (26.5%);". When ...

I came across memory usage reporting error using v.5.22 with web proxy enabled caching to RAM. "System -> Resources" claim to have 4GiB free memory on my RB450G, while graphs say for example "Max: 345.17MiB (137.4%); Average: 124.61MiB (49.6%); Current: 66.73MiB (26.5%);". When I...

Thank you very much for the reports.
We will try to fix "F" in the upcoming versions.

Any plans regarding this issue? Will this be fixed or we shouldn't bother waiting?


Thanks,
Lukasz

Thank you very much for the reports.
We will try to fix "F" in the upcoming versions.

Any luck bringing it back? Cause it's not present in 5.19...

Anyone tried the new 5.4 and graphs? Do they still disappear?

Hi!

I've got a question considering switch configuration on multiple-wan router. I've got three WAN uplinks connected to eth3, eth4 and eth5. LAN is on eth1 and eth2 (both bridged). Should I exclude WAN ports from switch?

Thx for all help in advance,
Lukasz

Well, I did some tests with synchronizing NTP as fast as possible and the graphs stayed after reboot in 6 out of 12 tests. It looks like a random "feature".

It really looks like NTP synchronization problems and data gets overwritten. Does anyone tested if changing store time to 1hr fixes the problem? NTP should be synced by that time...

I also suffer from disappearing graphs Should we file a bug report? I'm running RouterOS 5.1.


Edit:
Once the graphs lasted after reboot, but only once. Since i did more than one reboot i'm not satisfied with the results...

Now, that is actually strange. I switched to dynamic IP pool, the problematic XP machine got the lease, i added it by 'lease make-static', changed 'address' to one i want, switched dhcp to 'static-only' and now it works

@fekler,

what does connection-limit=200,32 stand for.

Explain this rule more please

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP ... Properties

connection-limit (integer,netmask) Restrict connection limit per address or address block

32 means a 32-bit netmask, so per-host restriction.

Have you added it manually (/ip dhcp-server lease add...) or have you used make static from dynamic lease? Also I'm testing with Win XP SP3 Professional, but i don't think it would make any difference.

Come on guys, am I the only one with such problem?

So I diff'ed my and default configuration and I found nothing that would bring me near the solution. Any ideas why dynamic dhcp works fine for WinXP client and static does not?

Are you using only RAM for cache or perhaps microSD card?

Edit:
Sorry, missed the "even without caching" part.

IMHO windows XP does not use RFC compliant shcp client. And onl y lately they started to care about "those" documents on the internet. Alright, but i need to run a static-only DHCP server in a mixed Win7/XP/Linux environment. Any suggestions how to solve this problem? Upgrading WinXP to W...

OK, so i just checked whether dynamic pool works and unfortunately it does. Meanwhile static-only works just for Windows 7 and *nix clients. Why is that?

Just add address-pool to your dhcp server.

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/DHCP_Server

What for? I want to use static-only leases. AFAIK there's no need for pool for that, I only need static leases set up in "/ip dhcp-server leases".

I just checked the default configuration and it works well with XP. This is very sad, as i will have to compare configs side by side. Thanks anyway.

I admit I am also taking a few shots in the dark here. What happens if you uncheck "Always Broadcast"? This essentially stops the DHCP server from sending a broadcast check to see if an address is currently in use. Long shot, but worth a try. Nothing changes. There's no difference with &q...

it looks like the XP machine is trying to renew an IP given to itself via Automatic Private IP address. Can you disable that setting and see if anything happens? It doesn't matter whether the XP client already has Automatic Private Address or not Discover doesn't work. In case of Win7 it works both...

My current configuration is: ethet1 & ether2 bridged for LAN, dhcp-server running on bridge, LAN ip address on ether1 ether3, 4 & 5 set up for ADSL WAN connectivity, loadbalanced. DHCP server offers leases for clients like Windows 7 and Linux, outbound connectivity is available. Problem appe...

Hi! While configuring router for static leases only i encountered problems with Windows XP SP3 DHCP clients. Everything works fine while using Win7 and Linux, as they send DHCP Discover with bootp flag unset 0x0000 (unicast). Windows XP sends DHCP Discover with bootp flag set 0x8000 (broadcast) and ...