MikroTik

ranpha

Ok, just received the Mikrotik quickMOUNT extra thing, and it works perfectly.

ranpha

Has anyone with Wireless Wire Cube wall mount their installation? If yes, how did you do it?

ranpha

Website updated, but currently no available block diagrams

ranpha

This Mikrotik video shows grounding of SXT devices -
https://youtu.be/-KNo1B7K-YY
A short ground cable back to the main support structure.

I have seen that video. The question is what is the size of the ring terminal that the short ground cable uses.

ranpha

Sorry for bumping up this topic.

c78515f897cf8ad5ee2b6897052463f4.jpg

What I want to know is the correct diameter (d2 (mm)) to be used for ground cables in SXT CPE like this one.

Thanks.

ranpha

Hello, I want to know whether it is possible to connect to a VPN server from a routerOS device over another VPN connection. For example, I have two L2TP/IPSEC accounts on server A and server B. I connect to the first VPN at the server A over PPPoE connection. Then it is possible to create another L2...

ranpha

Unfortunately siso. I don't know why Mikrotik decided this way?

Highly likely the antenna.

I hope the availability is better than nVidia RTX 3080. Can I get this this year?

ranpha

Do you have to put VLAN information in 'Application ---> Multicast ---> VLAN Configuration' section? I have the exact same GPON stick but cannot connect to the Internet via PPPoE at all. Nope, works plainly. PPPoE is not a matter of the ONU but the router on it's proper virtual vlan interface. Ok, ...

ranpha

Hello guys, I have tested so far: ZISA OP151S DFP-34G-2C2 DIPPER OPTICS D23446-SSHE HUAWEI HG8010H (not SFP. Pure bridge device with one ETH port) All of the tested resulted the same! With all of these modules and HUAWEI device I can get O5 state for GPON and I can access the native VLAN on the eth...

ranpha

add action=none dst-address=168.192.88.0/24 src-address=0.0.0.0/0

Does this works with all IKEv2 VPN providers, or did I have to change the dst-address values?

ranpha

The modem inside the Audience LTE6?

Now waiting for Mikrotik to sell the modem separately.

ranpha

Situation:- Gateway router IP: 192.168.88.1 raspberrry pi (pi-hole): 192.168.88.20 Offending device IP: 192.168.88.30 My DHCP server has been set to give out addresses via static addressing, with the DNS server being 192.168.88.20. But a wayward device (the 192.168.88.30) has its DNS hardcoded to Go...

ranpha

As in this device, as well as others: >> RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT-US (USA) is factory locked for 2412-2462MHz, 5170-5250MHz and 5725-5835MHz frequencies. This lock can not be removed. I see the US versions do not include UNII-2, or DFS channels. They are allowed in the US, so what is the reason of the l...

ranpha

After mucking around with 'fetch', the below code is what I use to update my current IP with Getflix:- /tool fetch mode=https user=replace_this_with_your_API password=x keep-result=no http-method=put url=https://www.getflix.com.au/api/v1/addresses.json Putting it here so that no one else coming from...

ranpha

Thanks, the ROMON method works OK.

ranpha

Hello, Currently I have a Mikrotik wAP LTE configured in passthrough mode, connected to ether1 interface of a Mikrotik RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN router. Everything is working fine. Now what I want to know is exactly how to configure the Mikrotik wAP LTE, and maybe the Mikrotik RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN too, so th...

ranpha

This also happens to me when I am testing LTE IP passthrough feature.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

ranpha

PPTP and L2TP is blocked on the network. OpenVPN client still needs to be updated.

ranpha

The one thing I don't like about using dst-nat to do the same thing is lacks of failovers. In my picture above, if one server failed/unreachable, routerOS will retry with other servers in the list. With dst-nat, if the server specified in the top failed/unreachable, routerOS will not proceed to use ...

ranpha

https://miku.hatsune.my/routeros-dns.jpg Above is the setting page for specifying DNS resolvers. My feature request is for the ability to specify custom port(s) for accessing those DNS servers. As of now, the servers specified in the picture above will be accessed via only port 53 when resolving do...

ranpha

Hi! After i upgrade from 6.30.4 to 6.34 i discover ipv6 was not working anymore. The issue seams to be the ipv6 dhcp client stuck in "Status: searching...". After i click the "Release" button the status is switching to "Status: bound" and then ipv6 is working fine. I'm...

ranpha

my prefix isn't changing in this case. it's "semi permanent". What do you mean 'semi permanent'? Either you have a static prefix (like a HE tunnel), or you doesn't. my isp gives me the same ipv6 prefix every time i auth. they reserve the right to change it so its not static. When you do t...

ranpha

read http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 04#p393600
my prefix isn't changing in this case. it's "semi permanent".

What do you mean 'semi permanent'? Either you have a static prefix (like a HE tunnel), or you doesn't.

ranpha

I've been chasing down an IPv6 bug that's been a little difficult to work out. The circumstances are as follows: * Internet connection is PPPoE * DHCPv6 Client attached to PPP interface /ipv6 dhcp-client add add-default-route=yes interface=Internode pool-name=NODE-PD * IPv6 address from DHCPv6 Pool...

ranpha

So I have my DHCPv6 client getting a set of addresses from the cable co. It sets up a pool. The DHVPv6 server is set to the pool... Firewall is all open... Clients dont get IPv6 addresses. Im a IPv6 noob. What else do I need to do ? I must need to advertise my cable co provided pool but I dont have...

ranpha

RouterOS 6.6 has a fatal bug regarding IPv6. I pull a /64 prefix from my ISP via DHCPv6-PD which will then put into the 'pool-ipv6' pool, then I advertise the 'pool-ipv6' on 'bridge-local' interface so that devices in the network can get IPv6 addresses via SLAAC. With routerOS 6.6, if I recycle the ...

ranpha

Still the same as of today. Can be mitigated though by the script at http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=77404

ranpha

Using this script allows me to force the stale IPv6 addresses in the adapter to be depreciated, keeping IPv6 connectivity alive without having to disable and enable the network interface. :log info "IPv6 Check Start"; #poolname is the name of the IPv6 pool that contained the prefix you got...

ranpha

Many ISPs use as WAN IP routable not verify your address do a tracert and see where your package is. tracert command is not working in Mikrotik terminal, this is what I tried [myuser001@MikroTik] > tracert http://www.google.com bad command name tracert (line 1 column 1) It is '/tool traceroute www....

ranpha

It has nothing to do with DNS not being advertised. If your ISP assigns dynamic IPv6 prefixes over DHCPv6-PD and it changed when your client(s) are still connected to the router, they will lose connectivity because the stale IPv6 address(es) the client get from the router are not marked depreciated.

ranpha

I hope ticket #2013100666000046 can also be looked at. Thanks.

ranpha

If you are talking about the IPv6 routes on the computer, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with them. The only difference seen in the computers, after I recycle the PPPoE connection, is that there are new two entries in "/netsh interface ipv6 show route" command. The old depreciated...

ranpha

Restarting the computer doesn't seem to work, after recycling the PPPoE connection. Damn, this is where I wish routerOS actually has a fully-featured DHCPv6 implementation.

ranpha

The ISP I use now have dual-stack IPv6/IPv4 connectivity, but I have a major problem using it in routerOS (RB751U-2HnD - routerOS version 6.4). Here is what I have done to enable the IPv6 in my simple home network. 1. I run a DHCPv6-PD client on the PPPoE interface, and a random /64 was assigned and...

ranpha

In RouterOS v6, will it now has fully-functional DHCPv6 instead of the DHCPv6-PD that is available in RouterOS v5?

ranpha

I hope that when v6 goes final, it has a fully working DHCPv6 support in it.

ranpha

RB751U-2HnD has a very poor reception performance without an antenna. High ping, low CCQ and packet loss is going to be common.

ranpha

I do not have any devices connected to the router via Ethernet except the modem, so I cannot really say. All computers and phones here connect to the router wirelessly. Copying a file from a laptop to my desktop computer wholly via wireless tops out at about 16 - 17Mb/s only though, the computer onl...

ranpha

From your /queue interface print

5 wlan1 only-hardware-queue wireless-default

Try changing the only-hardware-queue to wireless-default.

ranpha

You don't want to change the IP addresses in the client computers? Then how about if you just bridge the ether1 and ether2 ports?

ranpha

Sorry for the very late reply. Only on the weekends I managed to get to take a few pictures. The quality isn't good because I'm using camera phone.

DSC00229v2.jpg

DSC00230v2.jpg

DSC00232v2.jpg

ranpha

How about the other two, if you have it? What is your /system package print output? I use Skype too with exactly the same routerboard and has no problem. I don't use either of the other packages. Do you use Skype over wireless? And do you use any Apple hardware? Would you mind posting your wireless...

ranpha

I cannot take pictures until tomorrow at least. MMCX antenna are rare, unlike RP-SMA.

ranpha

Used to be the same problem I have. The wireless performance of this routerboard is simply poor without an external antenna. Pinging the router over wireless and you can get 4-digit ms latency. What I have done is to put the router in an open small book rack, cover 2 sides of the inner wall of the b...

ranpha

How about the other two, if you have it? What is your /system package print output? I use Skype too with exactly the same routerboard and has no problem.

ranpha

Probably RouterOS version 6. I hope it comes before World IPv6 Launch though.

ranpha

The 'ntp' package has this uncanny ability to restart Routerboards without warning. Those 3 packages I mentioned are usually not included in a standard RouterOS installation either.

ranpha

The ntp package is for installing an NTP server (and also a client) on your routerOS installation. This means the devices on your network can use your router to update their system clock. If you disable it, routerOS will function only as an NTP client. Good enough if you want to use accurate clock f...

ranpha

Disable the 'calea', 'ntp' and 'lcd' packages, and see if the NAND problem goes away. Especially the 'ntp' package.

ranpha

As of 5.13, RouterOS doesn't have a fully working DHCPv6 server. It can only be used as DHCPv6-PD I think.

ranpha

*) bridge - fixed problem where arp reply-only or disabled mode didn't work and disabled bridge interfaces didn't have X flag; Finally, my most pressing issue is solved after two RouterOS builds. Now awaiting more SMB improvements from the utterly unusable state it is currently in... http://i.imgur...

ranpha

Actually I want to assign static IP address for the computers in the network instead of having privacy-enabled stateless autoconfig on them. Man, this means need to use other stateful configuration until RouterOS has a real working DHCPv6 server.

ranpha

Oh, thank you for the info. Can I assume then that a fully-fledged DHCPv6 server will come out later in future releases?

ranpha

Routerboard RB751U-2HnD and RouterOS 5.12. Just today I'm trying to play around with DHCPv6 feature so that I can assign addresses from the prefixes assigned to me by HE tunnelbroker.net to computers in my LAN, via DHCPv6 server instead of radvd. What I have done is:- 1. Set up radvd (on bridge-loca...

ranpha

Hi,

IPv6 works fine with reply-only on the bridge interface but now IPv4 don't work. Seems like it does not reply to ARP requests. I have not done a wireshark yet...

Also seen the same problem here.

ranpha

Just installed 5.12, and the IPv6 lost route problem is indeed fixed. But another problem surfaced with 5.12 that doesn't happen with 5.11. If I set ARP to reply-only at bridge-local, IPv4 routes will instead lost. With this, I can only access IPv6-enabled resources and not IPv4 resources.

ranpha

Just tried what you have suggested (deleting the bridge and runs everything on the wlan1 interface - the DHCP server is valid and working then in that config), but as soon as I set the ARP option on the wlan1 interface to 'reply-only', my IPv6 routes on that wlan1 interface become unreachable, which...

ranpha

After moving the 192.168.88.1/24 address to 'wlan1' from the default 'bridge-local', I'll still get an invalid DHCP server if I made on the 'wlan1' interface. edit: BTW, adding a new address to the wlan1 interface and then make a new DHCP server off the interface with the new set of addresses doesn'...

ranpha

/interface bridge port print [ranpha@MikroTik] > /interface bridge port print Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive, D - dynamic # INTERFACE BRIDGE PRIORITY PATH-COST HORIZON 0 I ether2-master-local bridge-local 0x80 10 none 1 wlan1 bridge-local 0x80 10 none /ip address print [ranpha@MikroTik] > /ip add...

ranpha

The main reason why I want to move the DHCP server off 'bridge-local' interface is because if I set the ARP setting for 'bridge-local' to 'reply-only' (as shown here ), the IPv6 connectivity from the client to the router will break. /interface print [ranpha@MikroTik] > /interface print Flags: D - dy...

ranpha

Sorry for bringing up this topic from the dead. Setting 'ARP' for my DHCP server interface (in my case, it is 'bridge-local'') to 'reply-only' works fine at preventing users with static IP addresses from connecting to the network, but it also break my Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel routing. Is there...

ranpha

Hardware: RB751U-2HnD with RouterOS 5.11. My problem is I can never run a DHCP server on any other interface other than 'bridge-local'. If I delete the default DHCP server, and then add a new one at either the 'wlan1' or 'ether2-master-local' interfaces, RouterOS will report that the newly-added DHC...

Search found 62 matches