Hi, is it currently possible (with a OmniTik 5 AC) to configure a regular 802.11ac Accesspoint for normal Clients but also configure a nv2 -protocoll enabled virtual accesspoint for terminating a PtP Link to another Mikrotik XT Lite5? Or are both transmission protocols incompatible that this could w...

Hi,

I got such a module with Revision 2.11

Is it possible to upgrade it to a newer version by software, or is the hardware also differen in the newer versions?

Thanks a lot!

Cheers,

Hi,

thanks for your answer. Yes sure, if you have to buy the parts it may be cheaper, but I af some S+RJ10 still lying around and some newer Clients do have a 2.5 Mbit ElCheapo 2.5 GBit NIC build in, so I thought, why not

Cheers

4920441

Hi, since 2.5 and 5 GBit ethernet makes sense regarding to hardware costs, I wonder if I can use a MikroTik CRS309-1G-8S+IN with an MikroTik S+RJ10 SFP+ Module in 2.5 GBit Mode. I don't have the hardware here, but in the switch, when I disable autoneg i can only chose between 100, 1000 and 10000 MBi...

I actually have turned IGMP snooping back on my CRS317. Cisco switches have a bug that let 0.0.0.0 win the querier election see CSCub33602 That is not the only problem when connecting a(at least a) CSS326 which only runs SwOS 2.11 to a trunk port of a DELL 7024 Switch which already has an IP Addres...

Hi, requesting only prefix ... address not needed, link-local is used for pppoe-out1 interface That's the only thing I didn't try out on my own yet, it seems - because, it works! now i get my /56 nets delgated as planned:-) I guess, if I'd like an IPv6 Address for my Mikrotik I have to assign it to ...

Hi, after finding a rather comprehensive and good blog entry how to handle the annoying IPv6 prefix changes from the Deutsche Telekom (security by obscurity) https://blog.chanoa.de/mikrotik-ipv6 I tried again (after a couple of years) to establish IPv6 over pppoe with a Telekom aka T-Online account....

We have included major IGMP Snooping improvements in SwOS 2.10 version. As kwinz already mentioned, if you still face some IGMP Snooping related problems, you should report this to support@mikrotik.com . A detailed problem description together with screenshosts, network diagram and packet captures ...

Hi there, after over a year, I was absolutely happy to see the new SwOS Version 2.10 with a lot of IGMP related improvements, finally it might be possible to use the switch together with "magentaTV" from 'Deutsche Telekom' (aka. T-Online) which requires absolutely IGMPv3 capable switches t...

Hey, don't like posting to myself, but whatever... To whom it may concern: The LAG + VLANs is supported on CSS326, only dynamic conversion from ports to trunk has not been implemented in SwOS yet. At the moment, it is required to configure exactly the same VLAN settings on LAG ports to ensure proper...

...since no one answers - not even the Mikrotik Suppot, I guess I bought another piece of "banana-hardware"

What a bummer... should have been staying by HP, but the energy efficency of the Mikrotik is so much better...

Hey All, I just bought a CSS326-24G-2S because of the IGMP Snooping capability, 2x 10 GBit SFP+ Ports and last but not least its very good energy efficiency. But after I got it (with stock 2.0 firmware...) and flashed it to latest 2.6 release the Problems begin. I got to configure two LACP Trunks (3...

Reply'ing to myself.... preposterous...:-) / ip route add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.111.0.1 scope=255 target-scope=10 routing-mark=odd add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.112.0.1 scope=255 target-scope=10 routing-mark=even add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.112.0.1 scope=255 target-scope=1...

Hi, I am currently trying to set up the following: wan1 -> DHCP dynamic (changing!) assigned private Adress from Provider wan2 -> DHCP dynamic (changing!) assigned private Adress from Provider wan3 -> DHCP dynamic (changing!) assigned private Adress from Provider lan -> Routerboard is DHCP Server fo...

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate that!

I'll try it out and tell if it had worked this way.

Cheers!

Uli

Hi, I am a little bit disappointed of the Mikrotik support...:-( Maybe I should be more patient, but I asked a question on Friday - the same as above mentioned - and no reply at all... only a reply from the ticket system. Did I forget to put some special informations into my request? Or am I too laz...

Hey.... I have still no idea how to make this work. But I think "mangle"'ing would be something worth to try, even if I don't know it that would work because of the same IP Endpoints on the other side of the pppoe tunnel, as it it the same MAC Address as well on the other side. What can I ...

Hi here. I got a small Problem here. Three pppoe adsl connections to my ISP. I set up every client on each interface (eth7, eth8, eth9) with the apprpiate username/password and they connect fine. There are three pppoe-Servers, where the internal clients connect to - each has an own non.overlapping /...

Hey there, after a couple of hours, everything seems fine. Managed to separate all Routerboard interfaces, set up some pppoe Servers, the User database and so on. Everything seems fine, dispite of one thing.... I chose to set up three networks 10.1.1.0/24 10.1.2.0/24 10.1.3.0/24 for the three pppoe ...

If you want individual ports , you have to delete these ports of they are member of a bridge abd also make sure master-port is set to none. How do I make sure that, lets say, ethernet port 2 is assigned to a fixed adress if I want to delete all ports from the bridge? Or is it totally different as t...

Hi, I just try to set up the following scenario and I am stuck at the very first step. Ethernet 6,7,8 should be configured as "IP less" Ethernet Ports. On Every Port one single pppoe client should be bound. On Ethernet Port 2 a switch is connected where all internal clients should login wi...