/interface/wifi/registration-table/print count-only
If true, it would be an "isotropic radiator"This conflicts a bit with a lot of postings I have read (I think from Mikrotek) that the radiation pattern inside is basically spherical
The 7.11alpha I was given by support did not fix this one for me.*) w60g - improved stability for Cube 60Pro ac and CubeSA 60Pro ac devices;
Yeah, this! I search every new release thread posted for mentions of ZT. We live in hope.I keep hoping to be surpised in release notes on MIPS support for ZeroTier – just be good to know if that hope is misplaced from Mikrotik.
Not helping me, unfortunately. autosupout.rif sent to support....*) w60g - improved interface stability for PTMP setups;
Yeah, about that.....now it's installed my CubeSA 60Pro ac has rebooted 7 times so far today, max uptime is 33 minutes. It seems like weak stations will cause repeated reboots. Going to try 7.10rc!Seemed OK on the test bench, although we know test bench != the real world.
Posts icon, I get it now. i in a circle most of the time, sometimes it's a flame. So it's still there, phew.For me link to last post work by middle click the posts icon.
Ask three network engineers what "SDWAN" is and you will get at least three different answers.
MT will never play any role in any SDWAN unless the boxes can understand & detect (many) application and steer accordingly.
Yes please, make sure endpoints work from behind CGN.
-It should definitely have a mode where the router reaches out to the controller, like how cnMaestro and UISP work. It allows devices behind NAT to be monitored and maintained without punching holes in a firewall.
If it worked at 7km then they wouldn't say 1km, would they? Or "as far as 2.4km" as it says in one of pictures...Is the Cube 60Pro ac whether they would work at 7 km ?
You need to add to your "going away on holiday" checklist, right after "cancel the milk", an entry saying "Disable ****ing script that updates my router without me there to test it".Well of course this happens when I am away in holidays.
Doesn't sound very "passive" to me :-DIt is quite simple implementation (only checks for single inter-wire resistence
I guess they never got around to fixing the brochure, https://i.mt.lv/cdn/product_files/PowerBox_200318.pdf still says this today.Then you would need to revise the brochure as it is clearly stated:
"It also supports passive or standard 802.3at/af PoE input/output."
Yes, that's why he's posted asking for help.It is quite normal that wireless download speed is higher than upload speed.
Just because it's common doesn't mean that it isn't idiocy. Shame that Mikrotik perpetuate this. It's like calling gigabit ethernet 2Gbps because it's 1Gbps in each direction.is a common designation use the term tri band router referring to a 2 x 5ghz + 1 2.4 ghz router
What we need is CAPsMANMAN to sync configs between main CAPsMAN and backup CAPsMAN. Maybe in v7.I have considered some sort of back up scenario. Where the AP has the config in cap and it is set as the back up.
Did you log a ticket with support? I am sure they would be interested to know.I just want you guys to know the CCR1009 just solved the problem. every single core works!
I haven't been able to find a mini-PCI(e) VDSL interface at any price, never mind cheap.BTW, are there any cheap mini-PCI VDSL
Having re-read the thread, I have misunderstood. I had assumed the OP was using an explicit proxy not a transparent one.How is the squid transparently proxying https without the end user getting problems?
I have to disagree here. As an example, Squid logs the hostname that it proxied the connection to along with the number of bytes transferred.This is not possible
...which is an improvement on "other people" just taking your login without you knowing about it!Off course someone can give login information to other people.
Connection tracking is essential for NAT, so either that page is wrong, or there is a subtlety to the phrase "connection tracking" as they use it.BTW – MT Wiki says:So now with Fasttrack conntrack works or not?Fasttracked packets bypass firewall, connection tracking…
Nah. I would expect 94Mbps TCP throughput on 100M ethernet. If you're getting 50-70M on 100M ethernet, something's wrong.keep in mind that 100mbps cable speed, on tcp protocol is approx 50-70 mbps.
Yeah, looks like it!Am I the only one that read 'xhamster'?was the internal mikrotik codename xmaster?
If you are a performance junkie, you can either buy something else with gigabit ports, or trunk two 100M ports.mind telling me the point of -> ac <- when your backbone is 100mbps?
Unlikely to be B or G if it's connected at 58Mbps.What is the mode of printer/scanner ? B ? G? N ?
Could you update this page accordingly?:af/at/passive are all supported
http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/wAP_ac ... 143210.pdf
No, hence describing it as a long shot.The idea with the bridge sounds weird, have you ever seen that live?
It seems it's my option to take the Cisco router or not however they cannot monitor the line without it.
Do you want them to monitor the line?What do you guys think?
Perhaps that's because there isn't one?Don't quite see what the problem is?
This is fascinating, and a little bizarre. Surely running an entire OS on SFP is a massive overhead?Based on the hardware schematic and public available information, there is large chance that the module is more like a linux computer with two bridged interfaces.
So, in summary, can we pass 802.3af PoE in to the mAP2nD and get 802.3af PoE out of it?802.3af PoE is working OK this time.
Pardon me if this is a silly question, but doesn't that mean that each layer's tendency would be to unwrap the other?use two layers and apply one in a clockwise direction and at the end of first layer apply the second in a anti-clockwise direction
Again, is it? Could be well within the indicated performance envelope, but without knowing the specifics, who knows...Hmm thats pretty low.
I am certain that somebody from Mikrotik has denied this but I can't find the thread right now.There is a known limit of 1Gb/s on a single tcp stream.
The example you linked says the Mikrotik would talk PPTP to the modem.I am actually not sure if I should be using a ppp client, a PPPTP client or a PPPoE client.
Quite - it sounds like the OP is trying to implement The Dude himself with scriptsI think "The Dude" is better for your solution. This is a monitoring tool by MikroTik itself.
It isn't, because none of the IPs you've listed are the default.it's all default configuration
You wish!this isn't something we will be managing proactively for the client
Neither, because I don't understand your network topology, or how to you intend to use your switch(es).So you suggest yes or no ?
Can you mactelnet from one to the other?I have two RB751U-2HnD as WiFi bridge (Mikrotiks without ip-addresses)
Bridge work, but i can connect only to one Mikrotik!
Yes, I understand that bit. When I asked what the mechanism for this is, I was asking karincanet how does one log such data to USB in RouterOS.In some countries all service providers are obligated to log such data and keep it for few years