Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 8 matches

by jitdor
Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]
Replies: 3
Views: 1570

Re: [Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]

[Update 8 Sep 2020] As it turns out, it is a case of the Mikrotik CSS326 or CCR2004 being picky with the GbE adapter of choice. Swapping out the network adapter restores full link speed immediately. The same "slow" adapter could obtain full speeds with other network equipment, which is wh...
by jitdor
Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: WAN IP + routed subnet split up
Replies: 2
Views: 532

Re: WAN IP + routed subnet split up

I have a similar setup as you. You need to assign an IP to a separate interface with the routed /29 address (e.g. port2 with IP 89.19.61.249/29), and then connect all other clients to that interface, either via a switch or by bridging additional interfaces to port2. Note that the first and last IP i...
by jitdor
Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:12 am
Forum: General
Topic: [Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]
Replies: 3
Views: 1570

Re: [Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]

[Update 4 Sep 2020] I've updated the CCR2004 firmware to 6.47.3, but that didn't change the routed /29 throughput.
by jitdor
Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]
Replies: 3
Views: 1570

[Help needed] Slow throughput with routed /29 subnet [SOLVED]

I am using a CCR2004 as my main router. My ISP has provided me with a /31 point-to-point WAN transport link, as well as a separate routed /29 subnet. The ISP connection is delivered via a SFP+ handoff and it goes straight to the CCR2004's sfp-sfpplus1. I have completed the usual setup (with the /31 ...
by jitdor
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Second usable IP in /29 does not work
Replies: 2
Views: 653

Re: Second usable IP in /29 does not work

You need to bridge the port you're connecting the server to and your WAN port (ether1), as they're within the same subnet.
Additionally, you'll need to exclude the server's IP from NAT srcnat or masquerade, else it will be seen as using 1.1.1.97 for outgoing.
by jitdor
Sun May 26, 2019 6:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Access to socks5 proxy installed in LAN from WAN. [SOLVED]
Replies: 3
Views: 5497

Re: Access to socks5 proxy installed in LAN from WAN. [SOLVED]

Hi NiPh, I'm trying to something similar, I have several VM running within my network, each of these VM is running a socks 5 server at port 1080 and I have mark routing rules under Mangle to route specific IP addresses to specific proxies. But it wouldn't work. The only way I got it to work is by co...
by jitdor
Wed May 08, 2019 8:50 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Firewall chain for virtual interfaces of tunnels [SOLVED]
Replies: 2
Views: 1270

Firewall chain for virtual interfaces of tunnels [SOLVED]

I have subscribed to a VPN service and configured multiple virtual interfaces as PPTP clients on the Mikrotik for various rule-based routing purposes. Since the VPN is a shared service, other customers connecting to the same VPN gateways would be placed in the same private subnet as my virtual inter...
by jitdor
Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:05 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: PPTP Routing via virtual gateway
Replies: 0
Views: 1055

PPTP Routing via virtual gateway

I have a CCR1036 running firmware 6.43.4. Currently, the router is configured as a PPTP client, with normal devices connecting directly to the Internet and specific devices routing via that VPN link using the source address routing mark + NAT masquerade. All of these are handled at the router level ...