As missing in v.7.1.5 we do still need these binding on VRF:

* IP SERVICE FTP;
* SNMP SERVER;
* NTP CLIENT;
* NTP SERVER;
* EMAIL CLIENT;
* BTEST SERVER;
* BANDWIDTH TEST CLIENT;
* SMB SERVER;
* DNS;
* PING (just GUI option is missing);

Could you please add those features?

What's new in 6.48beta48 (2020-Oct-14 10:26):

...

Other changes since v6.47.4:
*) ppp - added support for "Framed-IPv6-Route" RADIUS attribute;

Do this works for PPPoE ?

Don't forget to add VRF for management interface!

Hi Mikrotik!

Just looking at protocols we now do need EIGRP, ISIS and EVPN ... as you already added VXLAN support to V7!

Please help us

Federico

Hi @normis, are you going to implement it in V7 ? Could we have a "positive" answer. We really need it!

@normis are you planning to release EIGRP support in V7?

Adding those pluses is not helping anyone, we are aware of the issues in Catalina.
We already have started to work on wine64 support

Hi @Normis,

as we're stuck, how long will it take to adapt and recompile winbox in 64bit mode?

Kind regards.

Federico

I've tried to set manually 1000 base tx and full duplex on both sides, then ethernet stops to work at all!

Could someone help?

Thank you!

any update about that? UP UP

I've tried to manually setup ethernet speed and duplex on both routerboards connected to an RB260GSP but it doesn't work either at 10,100 or 1000 speed with both HALF or FULL duplex setup.

Is that an issue?

I'm using latest 6.34 RouterOS.

What does "stateful" link-local IP mean? Does this mean that you want to assign a static link-local address? I know Cisco lets you do it, and it's nice because you can make the access router on a segment be a simple fe80::1 for every network... You can fake this with a Mikrotik by changin...

UP, i really need this feature, could i get any updates on it?

Not Really Solved. The issue still exists. The only way to avoid it is to uncheck the "one session per host" flag, accepting multiple connections or just to move local authentication to radius. 1) Usign RADIUS you can set "one session per host" enabled? 2) why the client make mu...

Here is an Open Source Project:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openacs/

It is used by many ISP.

Please let us know when a beta could be ready

Any news about this topic ? It should be easy to remove a limitation, right?

Not Really Solved. The issue still exists. The only way to avoid it is to uncheck the "one session per host" flag, accepting multiple connections or just to move local authentication to radius.

Local Passwords, Different Usernames /ppp profile add dns-server=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4 local-address=192.168.100.1 name=\ default rate-limit=1M/1M remote-address=\ testpool add local-address=192.168.200.1 name=\ default_voip rate-limit=1M/1M remote-address=\ testpool2 /ppp secret add name=test password=te...

/interface vlan add interface=ether11 l2mtu=9200 name=vlan108 vlan-id=108 add interface=ether11 l2mtu=9200 name=vlan110 vlan-id=110 /interface pppoe-server server add disabled=no interface=vlan108 max-mru=1492 max-mtu=1492 mrru=1492 \ service-name=PPPoE add disabled=no interface=vlan110 max-mru=1492...

I have configured two PPPoE servers on two different vlan interfaces, one related to data, the other to voice. I do need the customer could connect just one pppoe session for each vlan, so i do check the "One Session per Host" flag in the configuration. Anyway, as i can see in log, the sec...

+1

we need it!

+1 also!

As stated in subject we're used with many provider with which we do bgp peering to use link local addresses on Cisco Access Routers to avoid external public ip traffic flooding. Unfortunately, RouterOS up to the latest 6.32.3 does not allow to manually enter a stateful LINK LOCAL ADDRESS. Could you ...