MikroTik

yaikun94

i have config hairpin nat on my ccr1009 so that i can use ip pub to go to another device on my local network. The problem is that it only work for ip. If im using domain name it will result error page. Here is my firewall config. /ip firewall nat 0 chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=WAN lo...

yaikun94

If you don't see original source address, it means that it was changed by NAT, in this case srcnat. So look at your srcnat rules and you'll probably find something like: /ip firewall nat add action=masquerade chain=srcnat Such rule would apply to all connections, both outgoing and incoming. So you ...

yaikun94

If you don't see original source address, it means that it was changed by NAT, in this case srcnat. So look at your srcnat rules and you'll probably find something like: /ip firewall nat add action=masquerade chain=srcnat Such rule would apply to all connections, both outgoing and incoming. So you ...

yaikun94

Looks like too broad masquerade rule.

Hi, sorry for the late replied.
could you be more specific pls.

yaikun94

My config is simple. ISP>>>RB1100AHx2>>>NAS Server. +++RB1100AHx2: -ether1: wan (receive ip from isp) -ether2-10: lan (ip 20.0.0.0/24) +++NAS Server -receive ip from RB1100Ahx2 (20.0.0.4) I have configured port forwarding on RB1100AHx2 from ip wan to 20.0.0.4 and it worked well. The problem is when ...

yaikun94

Thanks guys,
Done it with script. But i cant send notification to email using script. Here is my script test.
{
/tool e-mail send to="xxx@gmail.com"
subject="test"
body="asdt"
tls=yes
}

yaikun94

Do mikrotik have a feature that notify me when one of the ethernet port not working or tx/rx rate not running on that port ??
Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english

yaikun94

Solved, put my NAT rule masquerade for src.address 172.16.10.0/24 in router 2 to the top (just notice it behind other nat rules so it won't work.) and it work like a charm. Gotta note it =.=!! Thanks you guys for helping me all this time :) Good to hear you solved it, nevertheless I am curious abou...

yaikun94

Solved,
put my NAT rule masquerade for src.address 172.16.10.0/24 in router 2 to the top (just notice it behind other nat rules so it won't work.) and it work like a charm. Gotta note it =.=!!
Thanks you guys for helping me all this time

yaikun94

Maybe you must add rule to forward chain?
Code: Select all
chain=forward action=accept src-address=0.0.0.0 dst-address=172.16.10.0/24 log=no log-prefix=""

i'll try it later tks.

Does your DHCP supply gateway address?

yes it is

yaikun94

try to add:

172.16.10.0/24 gate 192.168.10.x ( your gateway )

already did it in router1. After route i can ping 172.16.10.1 but can't ping client (ex.172.16.10.252)

yaikun94

If it's a home version Windows pc you're trying to ping, the default Windows firewall doesn't allow ping responses to other subnets. Try temporarily disabling the firewall. Already disabled but still not work =.=!! Maybe you must add rule to forward chain? you are in double nat, generally not good ...

yaikun94

Hi, sorry for the late reply, Here is my 2nd router config ***Router2: http://i.imgur.com/tLUl8Ql.png -Bridge1 received ip from router1 (192.168.1.8 ) -Bridge2 created dhcp server and has 1 client (192.168.20.252) ***Router1: http://i.imgur.com/qLSmH9M.png http://i.imgur.com/xDTOov7.png -Try to ping...

yaikun94

are you using any NAT on the second router?
How about firewall, on both routers and the destination client?

the 2nd router don't have any NAT, try to add once but it's the same result.
There is no firewall rules on both routers

yaikun94

Anyone

(

yaikun94

I have 2 RB951G, let's call it A and B. RouterA: - ether1: wan -ether2-5: lan with dhcp server (192.168.10.0/24) RouterB: -ether1-2: bridge received ip from routerA (192.168.10.254/24) -ether3-5: lan with dhcp server (172.16.10.0/24) client with ip 192.168.10.0/24 can't ping client with ip 172.16.10...

yaikun94

In case 2
Try to work dhcp-client and select ether who in case 1
And finally try to access hotspot from case 2

Hi, thanks for your reply.
i don't understand this part "select ether who in case 1"
Could you be more specific pls

yaikun94

well, thanks for the feedback ,, then i guess i will go a head with it the next few days thank you again yaikun94 :) just carious to know weather you followed the above pcc method on your rb951 since i have tried various load balancing ways including bridging the ISP modem links on the rb750hEX an...

yaikun94

Hi, i have a question about mikrotik hotspot. CASE1: -RouterA: --ether1: Wan --ether2-5: Lan (Bridge). configured hotspot on bridge. Everything worked fine, hotspot login page appear if i want to use internet. CASE2: -RouterA: --ether1: Wan. --ether2-5: Lan (Bridge). -RouterB: --ether1-5: received ...

yaikun94

the problem is that i don't have one on my hand to give it a try, so it's better to ask before buying one. I'm sure someone has tried rb951 for doing the load balance. BTW the hotspot is configured on another x86 ros so the RB is just for doing the load balancing :) hi, sorry for the late reply. I ...

yaikun94

Guys I got RB750Gr2 (hEX) to do the load balancing for 2 WAN (each one is 4Mb) the speed of connection is so terrible i tried both pcc and nth but nothing changed .. someone suggested that i should get RB951 instead of the RB750Gr2 to do the load balancing.. i don't know is it a hardware problem or...

yaikun94

Thanks everyone for helping me

yaikun94

How do you test? Which tools are you using?

Im using tools>bandwidth test in routerOS to test

yaikun94

I have configured fasttrack connection with 2 routers 951G and using tools>bandwidth test to test speed between 2 router. According to performance test result on this website http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD if i config fasttrack i can get more than 900mbits speed. But, before and after i have con...

yaikun94

Ok, i have checked with my friend and he said that router 2011 will srtart to lost packet if it has more than 150mbits wan speed. SO i guess this is hardware problem.

yaikun94

Yes, CPU AR9344 not enough power You can do it with 200Mbps single WAN, but it can't run PCC loadblancing more than 70Mbps but im using load balance with 3 wan and it has 140mbits and it worked fine too. It will drop speed when NAT sessions increases 70 Mbps under real conditions, not speedtest.net...

yaikun94

i think your pcc config will be this way for better response. For example: /ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=input comment="" disabled=no in-interface=WAN1 new-connection-mark=WAN1_conn passthrough=yes add action=mark-connection chain=input comment="" disabl...

yaikun94

You should upgrade to RB1100 or CCR1009 so the internet speed drop because the router RB2011 can't handle it ? Not because of the config ?? Yes, CPU AR9344 not enough power You can do it with 200Mbps single WAN, but it can't run PCC loadblancing more than 70Mbps but im using load balance with 3 wan...

yaikun94

You should upgrade to RB1100 or CCR1009

so the internet speed drop because the router RB2011 can't handle it ?
Not because of the config ??

yaikun94

Hi, i have configured load balance pcc 3 wan on RB2011 (2 line 50mbits and 1 line 40mbits) and it worked fine. Now i want to add 1 more wan line 40mbits. But after i added it and config on RB2011, the internet speed drop greatly (from 120~140mbit to 50~70mbits). Here is my config. [size=85][font=Hel...

yaikun94

solved.
the problem is the cable only 100mbits speed. change ti 1gbits cable solve the problem. (gotta be careful next time)
Thanks everyone for helping me with this problem.

yaikun94

do you check your configuration?
after all pcc load balance wont give you all of 150mbps

i know i won't give the exact numer but at least it should around 130~150Mbits. My speedtest result only give me 90~100 at best.

yaikun94

if you use pcc load balance its per connection balancing when you test your internet over speedtest.net it just use 1 connection for test you must use a test link and download it with idm (internet download manager ) in pcc i already config "both addresses and port" in "per connec...

yaikun94

With fasttrack enabled, it is possible to reach 500 Mbps download at least.

If you use ookla, the speed that you see depends on which server you connect to.

Could you show me how to enable fasttrack ?

yaikun94

What ports are involved in your test? Switch 2 has only single 100mbits line to cpu.

im using 1gbits port (port5) to test but the result only 100Mbits on speedtest

yaikun94

What is the max download limit of RB2011?? i have 3 line ISP (50Mbit each line) that already config load balancing pcc. But when i used speedtest my up/down rate only 100mbit, not 150 mbit??? Did i do something wrong or RM2011 max up/down rate is 100mbit??? Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad eng...

yaikun94

You need to specify src-address when pinging from the router.

From Router1:
Code: Select all
/ping 172.16.20.X src-address=172.16.10.Y
You can also check IpSec "Remote peers" section for phase1 status and "Installed SA" for phase2 status.

it's worked. Thanks alot
Silly me =.=!!!!!

yaikun94

i have 2 RB951 both config ipsec site to site. But both routers can't ping ip local of each other. Did i do something wrong?? Any ideas is helpful. Thanks in advance. Router1: -wan ip: 10.0.0.2/24 -local: 172.16.10.0/24 /ip firewall nat 0 chain=srcnat action=accept src-address=172.16.10.0/24 dst-add...

yaikun94

solved.
using ip firewall filter, i accept all traffic from wan1 and drop wan2.
here is the rules

/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=forward dst-address=[IP WAN1] src-address=\
    192.168.1.180
add action=drop chain=forward dst-address=[IP WAN2] src-address=\
    192.168.1.180

yaikun94

I have RB1100 that using 2 wan. I already configured load balancing pcc. Ip local: 192.168.1.0/24 here is my config. /ip firewall mangle chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wan1_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wan1 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wan2_conn...

yaikun94

Okay, So that 's means when i using "Both addresses" the packet only go in the route that i have marked right? that's why speedtest only see traffic of one line right? And if i use "Both addresses and ports" the packet will be classify into several line so the speedtest see all t...

yaikun94

How did you test with speedtest? Using one or more than one computer? The main difference between both configs is in the first one traffic is "spread" between both uplinks by PCC taking both addresses and ports as criteria (src and dst), whereas on the second one PCC uses just both addres...

yaikun94

Hi guys, I want to ask the difference between these 2 config. My topology is simple. My router received 2 IP, i has config each ip bandwidth is 5mb to test. The first one is: /ip address add address=30.0.0.1/24 network=30.0.0.0 interface=bridge-local add address=172.16.10.254/24 network=172.16.10.0 ...

yaikun94

Show your config for ether5 and the VLAN.

my config on ether5 and vlan is exactly like my 1st post.
Interface vlan40 add to ether5 and i created dhcp server for vlan40.

yaikun94

Is your PC connected to vlan40? Is it on a port that is sending vlan40 untagged or did you put some switch between them to remove the tag? If not, this is not going to work. my pc connected to ether5 which has vlan40 on it. Yeah i think it's untagged. Can i remove the tag using only 1 router not ad...

yaikun94

I wrote the same thing on Thu Apr 07, 2016 10:35 am but you ignored it...

Sory about that. I still new to network so i don't know much about it.
btw, im not ignored your post. Because my friend say he can do it in on router only. That make me confused =.=!!!

yaikun94

To share files using "pc-name" across a different subnet, you MUST use: 1. Hosts File, or 2. WINS, or 3. DNS When windows can't resolve a hostname via those 3 options, it then falls back to NetBios (which is what you're trying to use) where it sends out a broadcast packet asking all nodes...

yaikun94

Hi guys, I'm trying to config dhcp server with vlan on RB951UI. Here is my config. /interface vlan # NAME MTU ARP VLAN-ID INTERFACE R vlan40 1500 enabled 40 ether5 /ip address # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE 3 D 50.0.0.3/24 50.0.0.0 ether1 5 40.0.0.1/24 40.0.0.0 vlan40 /ip dhcp-server # NAME INTERFACE R...

yaikun94

Ask your friend to come by for a beer and fix your network. No choices huh :lol: :lol: :lol: No one on here is going to teach you how DNS works, that isnt what this forum is for. You need to go away and do your own research on how DNS works. There is plenty of information you can find on google. Th...

yaikun94

Ask your friend to come by for a beer and fix your network.

No choices huh

yaikun94

Up again!!!

yaikun94

Really @@!!!. But, my friend says he can share files using "pc-name" with config NAT on router and he don't tell me how to do it lol =.=!!. That's why i came here to ask hope someone will show me how :) :) But that is not a router question, it is a question for the OS, probably Windows in...

yaikun94

You only need to configured Mikrotik as Dns server and assign this DNS via DHCP.

Could you show me how to do it pls

yaikun94

Anyone ??

yaikun94

Hi, I think windows only does device discovery on the same subnet. What you can do is edit the host files on the computers and point the names to a ip address. Maybe you can create static dns entries for the on the router Really @@!!!. But, my friend says he can share files using "pc-name"...

yaikun94

I have 1 RB951UI with 2 DHCP server -server 1: 192.168.10.0/24 -server 2: 172.16.10.0/24 2 clients received DHCP from difference server. -ClientA: 192.168.10.2/24 -ClientB: 172.160.10.2/24 Client A&B can see each other. I want to share files between them using there "pc-name".Is that p...

yaikun94

Hi. I want to know if it is possible to block access to certain ip to others within a private network. For ex. the ip 192.168.1.10 can not access the 192.168.1.40 . ( As I have understood could not because packets do not pass through the router ... but ask just in case) . greetings and thank you ve...

yaikun94

If You don't need access from outside to routerA, problem is solved.
RouterA will be inaccessible because connections from Internet to any port on routerA will be redirected to routerB. The idea of my slution was to give access to routerB keeping access to routerA.

yours worked too.
Thanks

yaikun94

solved.
i use this config in routerA

  chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.0.33 
      dst-address=101.99.47.x log=no log-prefix=""

after configured i can access to routerB using public ip in router A

yaikun94

Thanks for your replied. If i config like that i will be able to connect to routerB wherever i go right ? what about DNS name in ip cloud ? Can i use it ? i couldn't not test it right now :( I think yes, DNS name should work, if resolved correctly. And yes, You will be able connect to router B from...

yaikun94

At first You should give router B, interface ether1 fixed IP address, i.e. 172.16.10.2, else it will not work, except You made reservation in router A DHCP server for router B (very probably, not). Second, if You want to connect to it with Winbox, here is dst-nat rule for router A /ip firewall nat ...

yaikun94

make a VPN to another site under your control and with IP public address
could you be more specific pls. I'm still new to this
Which router should i make a VPN ?
this image shows the concept

vpn.jpg

Look more confused now lol =]]. I think i will try to redirect it with nat rule :v

yaikun94

make a VPN to another site under your control and with IP public address

could you be more specific pls. I'm still new to this

Which router should i make a VPN ?

yaikun94

You can use romon

i know but ppl says i can ip cloud if i redirect port so i wan to try it

yaikun94

Hi ,
you are changing ports ! so it's a one way communication , packets reach Router B , but unable to come back , i think we should have 2 NAT here , one in router A , one in B

created firewall rules on both router A&B but still not working

yaikun94

worked.
But i want only wan1 can go to 31.13.95.36 (ip facebook). If i disable wan1, client 10.0.0.254 cant access to facebook through wan2 and wan3.
Any ideas guys ???

yaikun94

updated. Still need help

yaikun94

Hi ,
you are changing ports ! so it's a one way communication , packets reach Router B , but unable to come back , i think we should have 2 NAT here , one in router A , one in B

2 NAT in router A&B with the same config right ?

yaikun94

Then, try this /ip firewall nat add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=[Router1 WAN IP] dst-port=50080 protocol=tcp to-addresses=172.16.10.x to-ports=80 assuming you want to access port 80 on Router B. If course, replace with real IPs I still cant do it =.=!!! I tried to config like you did on...

yaikun94

i have rb951g with 3wan. Already config load balancing.
i want my client with ip local 10.0.0.254 for example only use wan1 whenever he use youtube.
Any ideas is helpful.
Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english.

yaikun94

i have rb951g with 3wan. Already config load balancing. i want my client with ip local 10.0.0.254 for example only use wan1 whenever he use youtube. Any ideas is helpful. Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english. Tried to add this rule but still not work /ip firewall mangle add action=mark-rou...

yaikun94

Give real figures, what internal IP is your router B, what port(s) you want to translate, and export the firewall rule you created. Hi, sorry for the late answer. Here is my config on 2 routers. RouterA -ether1: received public IP (ISP) -ether2-5: Lan (172.16.10.0/24) RouterB -ether1: received ip f...

yaikun94

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Forwarding_a_port_to_an_internal_IP still not working =.=!!! my router A which has public ip address is x.x.x.x. I have created firewall rule like the link u give me that forwading ip x.x.x.x from ether1 router A to ip y.y.y.y from ether 1 router B. Am i do it right ????

yaikun94

Check Romon, I believe it's the thing you need
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RoMON

or you can do some NAT in your "front" router, redirecting some random port to the "back" router.

could u show me how to redirecting port to the back router

yaikun94

is there a way to controlled router mikrotik behind another router and don't have to use 3rd software ???
IP cloud is nice but only worked with router has public ip.
Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english

yaikun94

very detailed.
Thanks ZeroByte

yaikun94

Tried to config with a setup like this (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/VLAN) but when i ping from different vlan. It's not "time out" but "no route to host" instead. That's mean if i create a route they can ping each other =.=!!!

yaikun94

a better way to do this can be assign a master port to each group of ethernet ports and then that master port give the addressing of the corresponding subnet, no bridges Could you be more specific plz ??? 1. no bridges 2. no vlan interfaces 3. set eth2 master port = none, eth3 master port = eth2 4....

yaikun94

i think in your configuration vlans are working but only in tagged mode that is vlan packets are tagged with vlanid How to use tagged mode ?? i already enabled "Use Service Tag" in Vlan config but it's not working ? service tag is for QinQ vlans so uncheck that Still not working =.=!!!

yaikun94

a better way to do this can be assign a master port to each group of ethernet ports and then that master port give the addressing of the corresponding subnet, no bridges

Could you be more specific plz ???

yaikun94

i think in your configuration vlans are working but only in tagged mode that is vlan packets are tagged with vlanid

How to use tagged mode ?? i already enabled "Use Service Tag" in Vlan config but it's not working ?

yaikun94

i have tried to created two vlans 10 and 20 on RB951G. But i thinks it's not working. After i configured vlan10 and 20 still can ping each other. Did i do something wrong ?? Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave # NAME TYPE ACTUAL-MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU 0 R ether1 ether 1500 1598 202...

yaikun94

Please keep in mind that RB951G is shipped with L4 license, so only 20 users of hotspot can online on the same time; unless you buy the additional L5 license and load it into your RB951G. Paul eh only 20 users at the same time ? But i checked it on this website and it says 200 users ??? http://wiki...

yaikun94

it 's worked perfectly guys =]]]. First 40 ip can connect to the internet but the rest of the ip can't. The firewall rules are same as above. Tks for the help guys

yaikun94

With pleasure. Please share with us how it works and what is the practical experience. Still don't know yet, but i thinks it will worked fine. Btw is my firewall rules correct ?? Firstly, I added 2 address list 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.42 and 10.0.0.42-10.0.0.254 then i created rules in firewall filter > ad...

yaikun94

Just open the first pool and set the second to be continued in it...

In other words, set pool2 as "next pool" of pool1. In dhcp server set only pool1. The pool2 should be used automatically when pool1 is exhausted.

Thanks a lot bajodel and jarda for helping me solved this problem

yaikun94

Thanks. Btw can u help me with your config i'm still new to this. Set two dhcp pools that means 2 dhcp in 2 different bridge right? Use firewall rules to enable the first pool and disable the scond pool internet access can u show me how. Thanks No, two pools (ip ranges) in the same dhcp (as jarda w...

yaikun94

Thanks. Btw can u help me with your config i'm still new to this.

Set two dhcp pools

that means 2 dhcp in 2 different bridge right?

Use firewall rules to enable the first pool and disable the scond pool internet access

can u show me how. Thanks

yaikun94

Set two dhcp pools, one with 40 addresses, second with the rest. Set short lease time (10-20s). Use firewall rules to enable the first pool and disable the scond pool internet access. Should be working. Tks but if one of the 40 users left. That leaves 1 empty spot in the first dhcp pool right ? tha...

yaikun94

40 listed individuals or randomly selected first 40?

randomly selected first 40

yaikun94

I have RB951G with 1 wan (eth01) and dhcp server (eth02 - eth05) with address 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254
I want to config so that only 40 users can connect to the internet. the other user still received ip from dhcp server but can't connect to the internet.
Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english

yaikun94

solved, changed firewall mangle rules to this and it worked. /ip firewall mangle chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wan1_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wan1 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wan2_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wan2 chain=output action=m...

yaikun94

Hi guys, i have tried to config Load Balancing PCC on RB951 but i don't thinks it worked correctly. Because i don't see any different before and after i config it. Here is my configuration. /ip address Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE 0 40.0.0.1/24 40.0.0.0 b...

yaikun94

already figured it out but thanks for reply anyway :

yaikun94

If I understand correctly, Router A has a static Public ip assigned by the ISP. for example 1.1.1.1 And you want router B to go trough a different public ip address 1.1.1.2 ? Router A has a automatic Public ip assigned by the ISP not a static IP, and i want ether 5 in router A (which has a static i...

yaikun94

someone help me pls. Is it possible for router B to connect to the internet using a diferent Static ip from router A ????

yaikun94

Hi guys, i need some help about Static IP. I have 2 routers. A and B. ---Router A: +ether1 received IP from modem (WAN) +ether2-4 DHCP server (LAN) +ether5 Static IP address (10.0.0.1) ---Router B: +ether1 Static IP address (20.0.0.1) +ether2-5 DHCP server (LAN) ++ether5(A) link to ether1(B). Can ro...

yaikun94

I thinks it worked. Try to configured it on internal networks and looks like it worked.
Thanks for http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:PCC
Gotta read carefully before asking next time :v

yaikun94

Hi guys, I just want to ask. Can Load Balancing work on internal network ??? I have 3 RB951 named it A, B, C. A and B recieved ip address from modem wifi. Both created DHCP server. router C will received 2 ip from A and B. So can i configure Load balancing on router C ??? Thanks in advance and sorry...

yaikun94

Solved. turn on the router and configured the same as before and it worked. Lol
Now, my router A can ping to gateway and client with no problem. Don't even know why it worked lol :v

yaikun94

someone help me pls i still can't figure it out T_T

yaikun94

my firewall settings is default (only NAT to WAN port) so i thinks the problem is my routes ......

yaikun94

Here is my topology I have two routers A & B (both RB951G): Router A (eth01-WAN: 192.168.0.6-GW: 192.168.0.1) (eth02-LAN-172.16.10.1) Eth02 link to Router B. Router B (eth01-172.16.10.253-link with Router A eth02) (eth02-LAN: 10.0.0.1) Eth02 link to client: 10.0.0.254-GW: 10.0.0.1 Router A ip ro...

yaikun94

thanks a lot ZeroByte. You really a big help for me

yaikun94

Hi ZeroByte can i ask you another questions ? The code u give me /ip firewall filter add chain=forward action=fasttrack-connection connection-state=established,related add chain=forward action=accept connection-state=established,related add chain=forward action=accept out-interface=ether1 add chain=...

yaikun94

It 's worked guys. Thanks a lot. Really appreciated it =]]

yaikun94

hi guys, i have a problem with trunking multiple Vlans. I have config vlans on 2 routers: RB951G and RB1100. Here is my config ***on RB951G [admin@PhuServer] > interface print Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave # NAME TYPE ACTUAL-MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU 0 R ether1 ether 1500 1598 4...

yaikun94

ok, i think i have found the problems whenever i enabled "vlan mode" and "vlan id" on CAPsMAN datapath my clients can't received ip address if CAP2>>Switch>>CAPsMAN. but if i disabled it, everything works fine. So any idea what "vlan mode" and "vlan id" is??? ...

yaikun94

someone help me plz =.=!! i think the problem is in my switch (RB2011) if i plugged my CAP2 directly to my CAPsMAn then everything is fine. My client can received IP address. But if i plugged my CAP2 to switch then to CAPsMAN. My client can not received IP address. Here is my switch conf Flags: X - ...

yaikun94

Hi Guys, I have a problem using CAPsMAN with multiple VLANs. I have 2 RB951G as CAPsMAN and CAP, 1 RB1100 as switch. Both CAPsMAN and CAP are configured to use CAP (CAPsMAN is CAP1 and the other is CAP2). everything is fine with CAP1. But when i enabled CAP2 my client can't receive ip address. CAPsM...

Search found 110 matches