This is expected behavior. We did not want to break your running configs. We just did not want to put "stable" stamp on BTH yet.While UI for BTH is gone as expected, I notice BTH config from 7.11rc builds remains and works – this seems right, since that part is just WG config.
But is the DNS for BTH going to remain active? e.g. I have couple working peers using the <sn>.vpn.mynetname.net to resolve the router's public IP. In my case it doesn't need the proxy part of BTH... so curious if the DNS part is going to break...
+1, recursive routing is PITA. I had a similar idea to yours: viewtopic.php?t=192844Please add the option to be able the ping IP for failover in route. example: check gateway ping 1.1.1.1 that would helps
BTH will be back on 7.12, no worries.Back to Home VPN not included in release version?
Edit: nvm, didn't realise to CTRL+F abbreviation: viewtopic.php?t=198641#p1019025
Very nice upgrade,
*) netwatch - added "src-address" property;
Please add the option to be able the ping IP for failover in route. example: check gateway ping 1.1.1.1 that would helps
Why should it require the entire chain, especially "server certificate that is used for specific service"? This cert can be changed on server side at any time.If use-crl is set to yes, RouterOS will check CRL for each certificate in a certificate chain, therefore, an entire certificate chain should be installed into a device - starting from Root CA, intermediate CA (if there are such), and server certificate that is used for specific service.
Very nice upgrade,
*) netwatch - added "src-address" property;
Please add the option to be able the ping IP for failover in route. example: check gateway ping 1.1.1.1 that would help
Yes, it does. But so does IPSec on this hardware. So...WG/ChaCha lack support för HW acceleration
Keep us posted. I have 02 of those beasts on a customer network running V7.10.2. Will refrain from upgrading until hear more from Mikrotik.I have CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ go crazy with console crashes, script errors (action timed out) and more. Sadly even generating a support output file fails...
Opened issue SUP-125133.
Keep us posted. Have a RB5009UG+S+ at home and will refrain from upgrading until hearing more from Mikrotik.please check SUP-125134
[RouterOS 7.11] RB5009 after upgrade to 7.11 route empty and cannot output suprif
Generating an export results in this before console crashes, just again:I have CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ go crazy with console crashes, script errors (action timed out) and more. Sadly even generating a support output file fails...
Opened issue SUP-125133.
#error exporting "/caps-man/channel" (timeout)
#error exporting "/caps-man/configuration" (timeout)
#error exporting "/caps-man/datapath" (timeout)
#error exporting "/caps-man/rates" (timeout)
#error exporting "/caps-man/security" (timeout)
Sounds like my problem, where you able to ping it from the router?My RB4011 does not allow a device connected to bridge port on a specific vlan to reach to any other device on that vlan, unless I'm running "Torch" on the port.
SUP-125214
I have to warn all users who wants to update LtAP mini units to ROS 7.11. All off-line units mentioned above (more than half of units) have SIM-Failure after update, nothing but only downgrade to ROS 7.10.2 helps. So I cannot recommend updating of LtAP mini units...Around 18 of 30 LtAP mini units are not on-line after update (they are on remote locations so I do not know if they are off-line due to LTE modem issue after update or stuck in boot-loop). Using IPsec IKE2 VPN.
Edit: what means *) lte - fixed LtAP mini default SIM slot "down" changeover to "up" after an upgrade (introduced in v7.10beta1); if we have default "up" sim slot on all units.
I got RB4011 and capsman works fine on 7.11, usually that error is firewall problem, try allowing UDP "5246,5247" on input chain on your bidge side and see if fixes it on v.7.11Hi,
Issues with CAPSMAN on a RB4011 router, error type "removing stale connection". Back to version v7.10 and OK.
BR.
I am having this same problem. I have an RB4011 and I have ports from both switch chips in the same VLAN-filtering bridge. My PC is on a trunked port on switch1 and two devices are untagged on a VLAN on switch2. I cannot ping them from the PC anymore, and when I torch on one of them or disable hardware offloading it works again, but for the other device it does not solve it.Sounds like my problem, where you able to ping it from the router?My RB4011 does not allow a device connected to bridge port on a specific vlan to reach to any other device on that vlan, unless I'm running "Torch" on the port.
SUP-125214
SUP-125143
From the router I can ping the device on that particular port, but nothing on another port. when pinging from the router the other devices are "magically" reachable from affected device.Sounds like my problem, where you able to ping it from the router?My RB4011 does not allow a device connected to bridge port on a specific vlan to reach to any other device on that vlan, unless I'm running "Torch" on the port.
SUP-125214
SUP-125143
I seem to have similar problem with a RB1100AHx4.Sounds like my problem, where you able to ping it from the router?My RB4011 does not allow a device connected to bridge port on a specific vlan to reach to any other device on that vlan, unless I'm running "Torch" on the port.
SUP-125214
SUP-125143
But CAPSMAN has always worked fine with v7.10 without the need to open ports 5246 and 5247, I understand that internally CAPSMAN already enables them.usually that error is firewall problem, try allowing UDP "5246,5247" on input chain on your bidge side and see if fixes it on v.7.11
You may be having the "some configuration forgotten at reboot" issue that has appeared in v7 for several people.fun fact.. lora lr8 it also forgets which server it should be using after every reboot... using "TTN v3 (eu1)" usually...
does this have any impact on existing VLAN configuration?What's new in 7.11 (2023-Aug-15 09:33):
*) bridge - added warning when VLAN interface list contains ports that are not bridged;
*) bridge - prevent bridging the VLAN interface created on the same bridge;
Thanks for the info.. As it's a remote system I'll try this the next time I'll be at the location... I hope everything will remain online till then.You may be having the "some configuration forgotten at reboot" issue that has appeared in v7 for several people.fun fact.. lora lr8 it also forgets which server it should be using after every reboot... using "TTN v3 (eu1)" usually...
Try to export your config (and download it), netinstall the device to 7.11 without config, and then paste the exported config again (from winbox connected to MAC address).
See if that solves your problem without downgrading. There may be a corruption in the configuration database.
It would be convenient when MikroTik would add some "rebuild configuration" feature that does this all automatically within the router.
(export config to a file, reset database, import the exported config back in)
Maybe. For me the VLAN-filtering bridge is now broken and I had to revert to 7.11beta. I think my config is OK, but maybe MikroTik will at some time clarify what config you cannot have in this version.does this have any impact on existing VLAN configuration?What's new in 7.11 (2023-Aug-15 09:33):
*) bridge - added warning when VLAN interface list contains ports that are not bridged;
*) bridge - prevent bridging the VLAN interface created on the same bridge;
Even after reading this a few times, I dont know what this means?*) bridge - prevent bridging the VLAN interface created on the same bridge;
Yeah... I think they mean adding a vlan subinterface created on a bridge (the CPU side, to have an address and routing on it) as a port on the bridge itself. That could result in an encapsulation loop, which maybe crashes the system, uses all memory, eats CPU time or whatever.Even after reading this a few times, I dont know what this means?*) bridge - prevent bridging the VLAN interface created on the same bridge;
Just tried it.*) bridge - prevent bridging the VLAN interface created on the same bridge;
take a look at this info+1 something in VLAN filtering/HW Offload seems broken.
RB4011
Bridge/VLAN with VLAN filtering and HW offload, across two switch groups.
Can't ping device from one switch group to the other switch group.
Fun to track down, because when I turned on packet sniffer, it worked fine. (cause it disabled HW offload, I presume.)
Super, thanks!Thanks for the feedback on RB4011/RB1100AHx4 with HW offloaded vlan-filtering. The problem is reproduced, and we are working on a solution.
same HW, same problem. TCP mode works, UDP not. Mikrotik Team could you please fix it?OpenVPN (UDP)
hAP AC3. Very similar problem (viewtopic.php?t=197690). But addresses and routes are present.
Sent supout.rif to support@mikrotik.com.
Systematic problems with ovpn are really annoying.
I thought I had the same problem on my hEX S, but disabling the fast-path didn't help.Running Torch or Sniffer solves it because it disables bridge FastPath, the same as using:
/interface bridge settings
set allow-fast-path=no
/interface bridge
add admin-mac=xx arp=proxy-arp auto-mac=no name="Local Bridge"
add admin-mac=xx auto-mac=no name="PPPoE Bridge"
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether1 ] poe-out=off
/interface vlan
add interface="PPPoE Bridge" name="PPPoE vlan35" vlan-id=35
/interface pppoe-client
add add-default-route=yes allow=pap disabled=no interface="PPPoE vlan35" \
keepalive-timeout=60 name=PPPoE user=xxxxx
/interface list
add name=WAN
add name=LAN
/interface wifiwave2 channel
add band=2ghz-ax disabled=no frequency=2412,2452 name="xxxx" width=\
20/40mhz-Ce
add band=5ghz-ax disabled=no frequency=5240 name="xxxx" skip-dfs-channels=\
all width=20/40/80mhz
/interface wifiwave2 datapath
add bridge="Local Bridge" disabled=no name=datapath
/interface wifiwave2 security
add authentication-types=wpa2-psk disable-pmkid=yes disabled=no encryption=\
ccmp,gcmp,ccmp-256,gcmp-256 name=xxx
/interface wifiwave2 configuration
add channel="xxxx" country=Turkey datapath=datapath disabled=no mode=ap \
name="xxxx" security=xxx ssid=xxx tx-power=13
add channel="xxxx" datapath=datapath disabled=no mode=ap name=\
"xxxx" security=xxx ssid="xxxx"
add channel="xxx" country="United States" datapath=datapath disabled=no \
mode=ap name="xxxx" security=Apo ssid=xxx tx-power=20
add channel="xxxx" datapath=datapath disabled=no mode=ap name=\
"xxxxz" security=xxx ssid="xxx"
/ip pool
add name=DHCP ranges=192.168.xx.100-192.168.8.254
/ip dhcp-server
add add-arp=yes address-pool=DHCP interface="Local Bridge" lease-time=10m name=\
"Local DHCP"
/ppp profile
set *0 change-tcp-mss=default use-ipv6=default
/interface bridge port
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether2
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether3
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether4
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether1
add bridge="PPPoE Bridge" interface=ether5
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=dynamic
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
set discover-interface-list=!WAN
/ip settings
set accept-source-route=yes tcp-syncookies=yes
/interface l2tp-server server
set authentication=mschap1,mschap2 default-profile=default enabled=yes \
use-ipsec=required
/interface list member
add interface="Local Bridge" list=LAN
add interface=PPPoE list=WAN
add interface=ether5 list=WAN
add interface="PPPoE vlan35" list=WAN
add interface="PPPoE Bridge" list=WAN
/interface wifiwave2 cap
set discovery-interfaces="Local Bridge" slaves-datapath=datapath
/interface wifiwave2 capsman
set enabled=yes interfaces="Local Bridge" package-path="" \
require-peer-certificate=no upgrade-policy=none
/interface wifiwave2 provisioning
add action=create-dynamic-enabled disabled=no master-configuration="xxxx" \
slave-configurations="xxxx" supported-bands=2ghz-ax,2ghz-n
add action=create-dynamic-enabled disabled=no master-configuration="xxxx" \
slave-configurations="xxxx" supported-bands=5ghz-ax
/ip address
add address=192.168.xx.xx/24 interface="Local Bridge" network=192.168.8.0
/ip dhcp-server config
set store-leases-disk=never
/ip dhcp-server network
add address=192.168.8.0/24 dns-server=192.168.8.59,192.168.8.49 gateway=\
192.168.8.59 ntp-server=162.159.200.123
/ip dns
set allow-remote-requests=yes cache-max-ttl=1d use-doh-server=\
https://dns.adguard-dns.com/dns-query verify-doh-cert=yes
/ip dns static
add address=2606:4700:4700::1001 name=cloudflare-dns.com type=AAAA
add address=2606:4700:4700::1111 name=cloudflare-dns.com type=AAAA
add address=1.0.0.1 name=cloudflare-dns.com
add address=1.1.1.1 name=cloudflare-dns.com
add address=104.16.248.249 name=cloudflare-dns.com
add address=104.16.249.249 name=cloudflare-dns.com
add address=192.168.8.59 name="Local DNS1"
add address=192.168.8.49 name="Local DNS2"
add address=fe80::c6ad:34ff:fe01:4059 name="Local DNS1" type=AAAA
add address=fe80::4a8f:5aff:feef:d049 name="Local DNS2" type=AAAA
add address=94.140.14.14 name=dns.adguard-dns.com
add address=94.140.15.15 name=dns.adguard-dns.com
add address=2a10:50c0::ad1:ff name=dns.adguard-dns.com type=AAAA
add address=2a10:50c0::ad2:ff name=dns.adguard-dns.com type=AAAA
/ip firewall address-list
add address=0.0.0.0/8 comment=RFC6890 list=no_forward_ipv4
add address=169.254.0.0/16 comment=RFC6890 list=no_forward_ipv4
add address=224.0.0.0/4 comment="RFC6890 multicast" disabled=yes list=\
no_forward_ipv4
add address=255.255.255.255 comment=RFC6890 disabled=yes list=no_forward_ipv4
add address=127.0.0.0/8 comment=RFC6890 list=bad_ipv4
add address=192.0.0.0/24 comment=RFC6890 list=bad_ipv4
add address=192.0.2.0/24 comment="RFC6890 documentation" list=bad_ipv4
add address=198.51.100.0/24 comment="RFC6890 documentation" list=bad_ipv4
add address=203.0.113.0/24 comment="RFC6890 documentation" list=bad_ipv4
add address=0.0.0.0/8 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=10.0.0.0/8 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=100.64.0.0/10 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=169.254.0.0/16 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=172.16.0.0/12 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=192.0.0.0/29 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=192.168.0.0/16 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
add address=198.18.0.0/15 comment="RFC6890 benchmark" list=not_global_ipv4
add address=224.0.0.0/4 comment=multicast list=bad_src_ipv4
add address=255.255.255.255 comment=RFC6890 list=bad_src_ipv4
add address=0.0.0.0/8 comment=RFC6890 list=bad_dst_ipv4
add address=224.0.0.0/4 comment="RFC6890 multicast" disabled=yes list=\
bad_dst_ipv4
add address=240.0.0.0/4 comment="RFC6890 reserved" disabled=yes list=bad_ipv4
add address=240.0.0.0/4 comment="RFC6890 reserved" list=not_global_ipv4
add address=255.255.255.255 comment=RFC6890 list=not_global_ipv4
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept ICMP after RAW" protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept established,related,untracked" \
connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=input comment=capsman dst-address-type=local protocol=\
udp src-address-type=local src-port=5246,5247
add action=accept chain=input comment=capsman dst-address-type=local dst-port=\
5246,5247 protocol=udp src-address-type=local
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept l2tp" dst-port=1701,4500,500 \
protocol=udp src-address-list=!no_nas
add action=drop chain=input comment="drop all coming from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept all that matches IPSec policy" \
ipsec-policy=in,ipsec
add action=fasttrack-connection chain=forward comment=fasttrack \
connection-state=established,related hw-offload=yes
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept established,related, untracked" \
connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop invalid" connection-state=invalid
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" \
connection-nat-state=!dstnat connection-state=new in-interface-list=WAN
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop bad forward IPs" src-address-list=\
no_forward_ipv4
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop bad forward IPs" dst-address-list=\
no_forward_ipv4
/ip firewall mangle
add action=change-mss chain=forward new-mss=clamp-to-pmtu passthrough=yes \
protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn
/ip firewall nat
add action=accept chain=srcnat comment="accept all that matches IPSec policy" \
ipsec-policy=out,ipsec
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=PPPoE
/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="enable for transparent firewall" \
disabled=yes
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept DHCP discover" dst-address=\
255.255.255.255 dst-port=67 in-interface-list=LAN protocol=udp src-address=\
0.0.0.0 src-port=68
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment=capsman dst-address-type=local \
dst-port=5246,5247 protocol=udp src-address-type=local
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment=capsman dst-address-type=local \
protocol=udp src-address-type=local src-port=5246,5247
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop echo request from wan" \
icmp-options=8:0-255 in-interface-list=WAN protocol=icmp
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" src-address-list=\
bad_ipv4
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" dst-address-list=\
bad_ipv4
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" src-address-list=\
bad_src_ipv4
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" dst-address-list=\
bad_dst_ipv4
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop non global from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN src-address-list=not_global_ipv4
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop forward to local lan from WAN" \
dst-address=192.168.8.0/24 in-interface-list=WAN
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment=\
"drop local if not from default IP range" in-interface-list=LAN \
src-address=!192.168.8.0/24
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bad UDP" port=0 protocol=udp
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bad tcp" port=0 protocol=tcp
add action=jump chain=prerouting comment="jump to ICMP chain" disabled=yes \
jump-target=icmp4 protocol=icmp
add action=jump chain=prerouting comment="jump to TCP chain" disabled=yes \
jump-target=bad_tcp protocol=tcp
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept everything else from LAN" \
in-interface-list=LAN
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept everything else from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="drop the rest"
/ip upnp
set enabled=yes
/ip upnp interfaces
add interface=PPPoE type=external
add interface="Local Bridge" type=internal
/ipv6 address
add address=::c6ad:34ff:fe01:4059 eui-64=yes from-pool=ipv6 interface=\
"Local Bridge"
/ipv6 dhcp-client
add interface=PPPoE pool-name=ipv6 request=prefix use-peer-dns=no
/ipv6 firewall address-list
add address=fe80::/10 comment="RFC6890 Linked-Scoped Unicast" disabled=yes \
list=no_forward_ipv6
add address=ff00::/8 comment=multicast disabled=yes list=no_forward_ipv6
add address=::1/128 comment="RFC6890 lo" list=bad_ipv6
add address=::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 comment="RFC6890 IPv4 mapped" list=bad_ipv6
add address=2001::/23 comment=RFC6890 list=bad_ipv6
add address=2001:db8::/32 comment="RFC6890 documentation" list=bad_ipv6
add address=2001:10::/28 comment="RFC6890 orchid" list=bad_ipv6
add address=::/96 comment="ipv4 compat" list=bad_ipv6
add address=100::/64 comment="RFC6890 Discard-only" list=not_global_ipv6
add address=2001::/32 comment="RFC6890 TEREDO" list=not_global_ipv6
add address=2001:2::/48 comment="RFC6890 Benchmark" list=not_global_ipv6
add address=fc00::/7 comment="RFC6890 Unique-Local" list=not_global_ipv6
add address=::/128 comment=unspecified list=bad_dst_ipv6
add address=::/128 comment=unspecified list=bad_src_ipv6
add address=ff00::/8 comment=multicast list=bad_src_ipv6
/ipv6 firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept ICMPv6 after RAW" protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept established,related,untracked" \
connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept UDP traceroute" port=33434-33534 \
protocol=udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept DHCPv6-Client prefix delegation." \
dst-port=546 protocol=udp src-address=fe80::/16
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IKE" dst-port=500,4500 protocol=\
udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IPSec AH" protocol=ipsec-ah
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IPSec ESP" protocol=ipsec-esp
add action=drop chain=input comment="drop all coming from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept established,related,untracked" \
connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop invalid" connection-state=invalid
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop bad forward IPs" disabled=yes \
src-address-list=no_forward_ipv6
add action=drop chain=forward comment="drop bad forward IPs" disabled=yes \
dst-address-list=no_forward_ipv6
add action=drop chain=forward comment="rfc4890 drop hop-limit=1" disabled=yes \
hop-limit=equal:1 protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept ICMPv6 after RAW" disabled=yes \
protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept HIP" disabled=yes protocol=139
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept IKE" disabled=yes dst-port=\
500,4500 protocol=udp
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept AH" disabled=yes protocol=\
ipsec-ah
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept ESP" disabled=yes protocol=\
ipsec-esp
add action=accept chain=forward comment="accept all that matches IPSec policy" \
disabled=yes ipsec-policy=in,ipsec
add action=drop chain=forward comment=\
"drop everything else not coming from LAN" disabled=yes in-interface-list=\
!LAN
/ipv6 firewall mangle
add action=change-mss chain=forward new-mss=clamp-to-pmtu passthrough=yes \
protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn
/ipv6 firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="enable for transparent firewall" \
disabled=yes
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="RFC4291, section 2.7.1" \
dst-address=ff02::1:ff00:0/104 icmp-options=135:0-255 protocol=icmpv6 \
src-address=::/128
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop echo request from wan" \
icmp-options=128:0-255 in-interface-list=WAN protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept local multicast scope" \
dst-address=ff02::/16
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept site multicast scope" \
dst-address=ff05::/16
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop other multicast destinations" \
dst-address=ff00::/8
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" src-address-list=\
bad_ipv6
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop bogon IP's" dst-address-list=\
bad_ipv6
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop packets with bad SRC ipv6" \
src-address-list=bad_src_ipv6
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop packets with bad dst ipv6" \
dst-address-list=bad_dst_ipv6
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="drop non global from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN src-address-list=not_global_ipv6
add action=jump chain=prerouting comment="jump to ICMPv6 chain" disabled=yes \
jump-target=icmp6 protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept everything else from WAN" \
in-interface-list=WAN
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="accept everything else from LAN" \
in-interface-list=LAN
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="drop the rest"
/ipv6 nd
set [ find default=yes ] dns=\
fe80::c6ad:34ff:fe01:4059,fe80::4a8f:5aff:feef:d049
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Europe/Istanbul
/system identity
set name="hAP ax3"
/system logging
add disabled=yes topics=dhcp,debug
/system note
set show-at-login=no
/system ntp client
set enabled=yes
/system ntp client servers
add address=2606:4700:f1::123
add address=162.159.200.123
/system routerboard reset-button
set enabled=yes hold-time=0s..5s on-event="system shutdown"
/interface bridge
add admin-mac=48:8F:5A:EF:D0:49 arp=proxy-arp auto-mac=no name="Local Bridge"
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether1 ] poe-out=off
/interface list
add name=LAN
add name=WAN
/interface wifiwave2 datapath
add bridge="Local Bridge" disabled=no name=datapath
/interface wifiwave2
# managed by CAPsMAN
# mode: AP, SSID: Apo, channel: 2412/ax/Ce
set [ find default-name=wifi2 ] configuration.manager=capsman .mode=ap \
datapath=datapath disabled=no name=wlan2.4GHz
# managed by CAPsMAN
# mode: AP, SSID: Apo, channel: 5240/ax/eeeC
set [ find default-name=wifi1 ] configuration.manager=capsman .mode=ap \
datapath=datapath disabled=no name=wlan5GHz
/port
set 0 name=serial0
/interface bridge port
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether1
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether2
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether3
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether4
add bridge="Local Bridge" interface=ether5
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
set discover-interface-list=LAN
/ip settings
set accept-source-route=yes tcp-syncookies=yes
/ipv6 settings
set accept-router-advertisements=yes max-neighbor-entries=15360
/interface list member
add interface="Local Bridge" list=LAN
/interface wifiwave2 cap
set discovery-interfaces="Local Bridge" enabled=yes slaves-datapath=datapath
/ip dhcp-client
add interface="Local Bridge"
/ip dhcp-server config
set store-leases-disk=never
/ip dns
set allow-remote-requests=yes cache-max-ttl=1d use-doh-server=\
https://dns.adguard-dns.com/dns-query verify-doh-cert=yes
/ip dns static
add address=192.168.xx.xx name="Local DNS2"
add address=192.168.xx.xx name="Local DNS1"
add address=fe80::4a8f:5aff:feef:d049 name="Local DNS2" type=AAAA
add address=fe80::c6ad:34ff:fe01:4059 name="Local DNS1" type=AAAA
add address=45.90.28.95 name=dns.nextdns.io
add address=45.90.30.95 name=dns.nextdns.io
add address=2a07:a8c0::89:ef8e name=dns.nextdns.io type=AAAA
add address=2a07:a8c1::89:ef8e name=dns.nextdns.io type=AAAA
add address=94.140.14.14 name=dns.adguard-dns.com
add address=94.140.15.15 name=dns.adguard-dns.com
add address=2a10:50c0::ad1:ff name=dns.adguard-dns.com type=AAAA
add address=2a10:50c0::ad2:ff name=dns.adguard-dns.com type=AAAA
/ipv6 firewall address-list
add address=ff02::/16 list="linklocal multicast"
add address=ff05::/16 list="linklocal multicast"
add address=fe80::/10 list="linklocal multicast"
/ipv6 firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept ICMPv6 after RAW" protocol=icmpv6
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept established,related,untracked" \
connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept linklocal multicast" \
dst-address-list="linklocal multicast"
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept UDP traceroute" port=33434-33534 \
protocol=udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept DHCPv6-Client prefix delegation." \
dst-port=546 protocol=udp src-address=fe80::/16
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IKE" dst-port=500,4500 protocol=\
udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IPSec AH" protocol=ipsec-ah
add action=accept chain=input comment="accept IPSec ESP" protocol=ipsec-esp
add action=drop chain=input comment="drop all coming from WAN" src-mac-address=\
C4:AD:34:01:40:59
add action=accept chain=input log=yes
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Europe/Istanbul
/system identity
set name="hAP ax3 2"
/system note
set show-at-login=no
/system routerboard reset-button
set enabled=yes hold-time=0s..5s on-event="system shutdown"
/interface/wifiwave2/configuration> set [find] security.connect-priority=0/1
In version 7.x you need to use: "export show-sensitive file=backup" to include passwords etc.when i to try make a file export, the password of the user hotspot is wrong no exists
you can replicate "export file=backup"
I asked about this here viewtopic.php?p=1009237#p1009237, but the answer was a joke.Hi,
Can I please get some more detail about this? Link to RFC, forum topic, etc?
*) mpls - improved MPLS TCP performance;
Yes, quite disappointing that valid and politely asked questions for such a vague change line are brushed aside or ignored.I asked about this here viewtopic.php?p=1009237#p1009237, but the answer was a joke.
RB4011 only supports wave2 in 5G band, no 2.4G . So don’t install wifiwave2 package unless you have another 2.4G AP .I upgraded my RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD from V7.10.2 to V7.11, and my Wireless(2.4ghz + 5ghz) lost to Wifi Wave2 that is not working. Mode now have only AP and Station.
I wish I can have my Wireless back.
I think every other things seem okay.
Yes, I disabled Wifi wave2 and everything is okay, full wireless is back.RB4011 only supports wave2 in 5G band, no 2.4G . So don’t install wifiwave2 package unless you have another 2.4G AP .I upgraded my RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD from V7.10.2 to V7.11, and my Wireless(2.4ghz + 5ghz) lost to Wifi Wave2 that is not working. Mode now have only AP and Station.
I wish I can have my Wireless back.
I think every other things seem okay.
You can find all information about wifiwave2 here:What is Wifi Wave 2 for?
Thank you.You can find all information about wifiwave2 here:What is Wifi Wave 2 for?
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/WifiWave2
What is Wifi Wave 2 for?
No problems seen since yesterday. Haven't seen any real showstoppers anymore since 7.10 (for my use case).Someone tested this on hAP AX3? How is wifi on this build?
Now worst than before :)Someone tested this on hAP AX3? How is wifi on this build?
Running well on a hAP ax2. I had lots of wifi issues (basically 5GHZ radio dropping off line) with 7.9 and 7.10. I'm not ready to say the wifi is problem-free, but's much better in my case.Someone tested this on hAP AX3? How is wifi on this build?
Same issue on HEX! HW Offload Enable = vlans broken. Disable HW offload = VLANS workingThanks for the feedback on RB4011/RB1100AHx4 with HW offloaded vlan-filtering. The problem is reproduced, and we are working on a solution.
It is related to the FastPath fix (introduced in v7.11rc1):
*) bridge - fixed MAC learning on "switch-cpu" port with enabled FastPath
Running Torch or Sniffer solves it because it disables bridge FastPath, the same as using:
/interface bridge settings
set allow-fast-path=no
Hi,Upgraded 2 x 5009, 2 x cAP, 1 x mAP and 1 x cAP ax.
I have had the issue reported by AdB and eworm that my 5009 running my capsman is "dropping" the VLANs for any VLAN edge ports on the 5009. This includes the management vlan that then drops the wireless networks.
The rest are working fine.
Hi jhbarrantes,Hi,Upgraded 2 x 5009, 2 x cAP, 1 x mAP and 1 x cAP ax.
I have had the issue reported by AdB and eworm that my 5009 running my capsman is "dropping" the VLANs for any VLAN edge ports on the 5009. This includes the management vlan that then drops the wireless networks.
The rest are working fine.
had the same issue with an hEX-S with VLAN filtering enabled, running CAPsMAN and 3x cAP-AC's. I workaround this by removing "bridgeLocal" as discovery interface in the cAPs, and adding them a CAPsMAN address (so finding the CAPsMAN in L3, rather than L2). Just if it helps as a temporal solution.
Regards!
On my RB5009 running 7.11 it indeed seems like VLAN HW offload fails for all access/edge ports added dynamically to a bridge.Looks like this is not caused by capsman itself, but handling of dynamic interfaces in bridge.
>
I have had the issue reported by AdB and eworm that my 5009 running my capsman is "dropping" the VLANs for any VLAN edge ports on the 5009
This configuration already did not work for me BEFORE the problems with the 7.11 release were introduced (I am using 7.11beta4).The same hardware offloading related problems happens to me on CCR2004-16G-2S+ with v.7.11. Adding bonding interface (LACP) to a multiple VLAN LAN-side bridge (port 7 & 8 - the same internal switch-chip) causing many router-switch disconnections and LAG flapping. Disabling HW offloading on that specific bonding interface resolves the problem.
For me the downgrade worked. Uploaded the old version and hit the "Downgrade" Button in the Package Update menu.Can we get a “update” to go back to 7.10.2? As downgrade seems to be broken as well. Really need my network back!
If you are manually rebooting, you are doing it wrong. Upload the old package file, then click Downgrade button. It will reboot by itself as soon as you click "Downgrade".Wait, you did a upload and downgrade? Invited downgrade, no result. Upload and reboot, no success. Didn’t try this option. If I can get a connection again I will try this
Ok, I emailed the supout and put your name in the body of the email. I did not receive a ticket number or any email response. Edit: It just replied the ticket number. SUP-125522Thanks again for the feedback!
The issue with vlan-filtering bridge running together with CAPsMAN has been reproduced and we are looking for a fix.
@bommi, jayooo, dredex - regarding issues with HW offloaded vlan-filtering bridges on hEX or hEX-S. Can please you share supout.rif files to support@mikrotik.com? Let us know the SUP ticket number.
@jbl42 - did not manage to repeat this in our labs. Can you please share supout.rif files to support@mikrotik.com? Let us know the SUP ticket number.
Hi Jayooo,---SNIP----
Ok, I emailed the supout and put your name in the body of the email. I did not receive a ticket number or any email response. Edit: It just replied the ticket number. SUP-125522
This is easily reproducible. Just create a bridge, a trunk port and an access port. Leave HW enabled, enable vlan-filtering. It stops working, although you can PING between networks, but the speed is nearly zero. Not enough speed to even open websites.
Just downgrade the unit to 7.10.2 and also downgrade the routerboot to be sure!My hEX S is now hanging every two days and need to be powercycled every time.
No clue on why, happened twice after the upgrade to 7.11.
Very anoying since the router has been reliable pre 7.11.
My configuration has not changed for over half a year.
+1. It'd be very useful.Very nice upgrade,
*) netwatch - added "src-address" property;
Please add the option to be able the ping IP for failover in route. example: check gateway ping 1.1.1.1 that would helps
I conquer. With SW, it is usually safe to upgrade from a stable minor release to the next. Like form *stable* 7.10.2 to *stable* 7.11.As is the case with most software, you will learn that it is usually not a good idea to install a .0 release, at least not immediately.
Same problem with a CCR1036-8G-2S+I have CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ go crazy with console crashes, script errors (action timed out) and more. Sadly even generating a support output file fails...
Opened issue SUP-125133.
What tool do you use for massive upgrades?Just da smol home-network:
smol-net-1.jpg
Found no issues.
The hex vlan workaround is a few posts up. No need to downgrade.
All upgrade went well (no issues) BUT I have 2 hEX S with VLANs and those simple come up but users get timeout. Doing a downgrade restores the process so I think there is a bug there.
That isn't an upgrade issue then, assuming you did actually downgrade both the package and the router board firmware.İ have tplink acess point on mikrotik LDF5 outdoor.
İ had 7.10.2 version . i updated 7.11 after that my tplink acess point wifi speed about 1 mbps or more less but my with cat6 cable speed 86 mbps.
i downrage 7.10.2 but still nothing change. its seems my wifi totaly broken with all version software . i tried another acess point
still same result .
but i tried with another acess point i still get bad wifi speed. before i update mikrotik .i didnt had problem. with cable i get full speed. its very strange problemThat isn't an upgrade issue then, assuming you did actually downgrade both the package and the router board firmware.İ have tplink acess point on mikrotik LDF5 outdoor.
İ had 7.10.2 version . i updated 7.11 after that my tplink acess point wifi speed about 1 mbps or more less but my with cat6 cable speed 86 mbps.
i downrage 7.10.2 but still nothing change. its seems my wifi totaly broken with all version software . i tried another acess point
still same result .
That isn't a mikrotik issue. You say that "with cable" you get full speed but with 3rd party access point you get slow speed. However, BOTH of those scenarios are "with cable" from the mikrotik perspective. You aren't using mikrotik wifi.but i tried with another acess point i still get bad wifi speed. before i update mikrotik .i didnt had problem. with cable i get full speed. its very strange problem
That isn't an upgrade issue then, assuming you did actually downgrade both the package and the router board firmware.
It isn't.And since beta comes after alfa, this may already be in 7.12beta 1
its totaly about mikrotik. i tried one more diffirent acess point. 2.4 ghz slow speed 1mbps but 5 ghz i get full speed. Before update mikrotik i get also full speed 2.4 ghz. in total i tried 3 diffirent acess point all same. with that update maybe some setitngs changed ?That isn't a mikrotik issue. You say that "with cable" you get full speed but with 3rd party access point you get slow speed. However, BOTH of those scenarios are "with cable" from the mikrotik perspective. You aren't using mikrotik wifi.
but i tried with another acess point i still get bad wifi speed. before i update mikrotik .i didnt had problem. with cable i get full speed. its very strange problem
Plus, the only different between mikrotik versions is just software. Once you downgrade back to the same version, there is no difference.
Better to share your config:its my settings
/export file=anynameyoulike
The setting in screenshot means "nv2 OR nstreme OR 802.11" and in conjunction with any of station modes it means that station will adjust to AP's wireless protocol settings (so if AP is TPlink which obviously knows nothing about Mikrotik's proprietary protocols, station will use 802.11 protocol. Nothing wrong with these settings. However, if device is used in any of station* modes, all other settings (band, channel width and frequency) should be left to defaults (band=5ghz-a/n/ac channel-width=20/40/80mhz-XXXX frequency=auto) to allow station to follow AP to whatever it chooses to do. It's only sensible to set these parameters by hand if device operates in one of AP modes."station pseudobridge" + "nv2"
Are you serious?
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:W ... tion_Modes
can you please check this topicThe setting in screenshot means "nv2 OR nstreme OR 802.11" and in conjunction with any of station modes it means that station will adjust to AP's wireless protocol settings (so if AP is TPlink which obviously knows nothing about Mikrotik's proprietary protocols, station will use 802.11 protocol. Nothing wrong with these settings. However, if device is used in any of station* modes, all other settings (band, channel width and frequency) should be left to defaults (band=5ghz-a/n/ac channel-width=20/40/80mhz-XXXX frequency=auto) to allow station to follow AP to whatever it chooses to do. It's only sensible to set these parameters by hand if device operates in one of AP modes."station pseudobridge" + "nv2"
Are you serious?
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:W ... tion_Modes
Generating an export results in this before console crashes, just again:I have CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ go crazy with console crashes, script errors (action timed out) and more. Sadly even generating a support output file fails...
Opened issue SUP-125133.
Also I have seen this on CHR now, running CAPsMAN as well. I think the issue is hidden there, and not related to architecture.Code: Select all#error exporting "/caps-man/channel" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/configuration" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/datapath" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/rates" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/security" (timeout)
Happily I could generate a support output file this time on CHR, so let's hope for some results.
Are you guys using "normal" capsman or wifiwave2? I've wifiwave2 capsman on rb5009 and it makes supout without problems.Yep, looks like CAPsMAN is broken in v7.11 I have the same issue on a CCR1036-12G-4S.
CAPsMAN basically becomes unresponsive and I notice also that the VLAN's on my bridge interface also have no status i.e. no R (Running) status.
Generating an export results in this before console crashes, just again:
Also I have seen this on CHR now, running CAPsMAN as well. I think the issue is hidden there, and not related to architecture.Code: Select all#error exporting "/caps-man/channel" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/configuration" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/datapath" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/rates" (timeout) #error exporting "/caps-man/security" (timeout)
Happily I could generate a support output file this time on CHR, so let's hope for some results.
I have a bridge with 4 ports attached, ether2-5Please elaborate @si458: vlan attached to bridge and vlan-filtering on the bridge? Perhaps share (part of) your config?
There have been a few reports like this in forum. I think you have just add the IoT package and uninstall LoRa before upgrade to avoid.[...] I overlooked the new condition that the IoT package must also be newly installed for Lory to run. Can this new condition be somehow automated?
I confirm this problem exists!OpenVPN (UDP)
hAP AC3. Very similar problem (viewtopic.php?t=197690). But addresses and routes are present.
I can confirm this on my two wap-lr8 gateways.After updating my knot lr8 kit from 7.10.2 to 7.11 lora gateway seems to be disabled after reboot. it is reproducable by rebooting the device.. even though i manually started the gw, it remains enabled only till a reboot
Seriously though, what does this mean?Hi,
Can I please get some more detail about this? Link to RFC, forum topic, etc?
*) mpls - improved MPLS TCP performance;
Normal CAPsMAN, not Wifiwave2. It works fine on 7.10.2 but falls over after upgrading to 7.11.Are you guys using "normal" capsman or wifiwave2? I've wifiwave2 capsman on rb5009 and it makes supout without problems.Yep, looks like CAPsMAN is broken in v7.11 I have the same issue on a CCR1036-12G-4S.
CAPsMAN basically becomes unresponsive and I notice also that the VLAN's on my bridge interface also have no status i.e. no R (Running) status.
For the 1000th time: "stable" in the version name does not mean it works without bugs, it never crashes, it does what you want.Doesn't seem at all stable to me.
Band: 5GHz ACWhat channel width are you using, @fragtion? If using 80 MHz, you might have to select extension channel eeCe or eeeC.
/export file=anynameyoulike
Why? This is clearly related to the upgrade. 5320 is selectable on 7.11 but not 7.11.1. I downgraded to 7.11 and can now use the channel again until I purchase another wireless AP to replace the wi-fi on my RB4011.Can you please share your config:
If this is true:Band: 5GHz AC
Channel Width: 20/40/80MHz
Frequency: 5320 (Under Radios, I see that 5320 is removed from the whole "Current channels" table when country "United States" or "Canada" is selected)
Before it was working as a DFS channel that was subject to radar scanning, which I was fine with. Now it can't be used at all, leaving me with basically no noise-free channels to use in current environment.. :/
To check current settings and to give an explanation. You can provide only the wireless part.Why?
RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN-US (USA) is factory locked for 2412-2462MHz, 5170-5250MHz and 5725-5835MHz frequencies. This lock can not be removed.
So the other question is why did you buy a device for the American market, and then you didn't resell it when you moved to South Africa...Yeah, except that I'm now using the device here in South Africa...
That's an irrelevant and extraneous question (with all due respect). Besides for the fact that Mikrotik as a brand is generally not so popular in the US market, perhaps I did try to sell it and nobody showed interest especially when they read that I have the locked variant and they knew that it's possible to buy the international version even through vendors like Amazon if they really wanted to...So the other question is why did you buy a device for the American market, and then you didn't resell it when you moved to South Africa...
If you use a peripheral outside of how it was meant to be used, that's your business.If the rules of the State change, it is not MikroTik's job to inform customers, it is assumed that they already know the law, which does not admit ignorance.
So it's not MikroTik's business/duty to inform customers of a software change correcting regulatory channel enforcement? I'll wait for your infinite insight in answering this question thenIf you use a peripheral outside of how it was meant to be used, that's your business.
Hi normis,Check debug logs, see what is the error
I don't see any errors in the debug logs or look at them incorrectly. For many years of operation of your equipment, such problems have not arisen, but now I don’t even know how to find a problem, please help me with a solution.Check debug logs, see what is the error
Check debug logs, see what is the error
It's one of the dumbest things people can do on devices, and it applies to any software (to specify it, it was not understood) not only MikroTik ...usually my router is updating automatically
No, it is not irrelevant. In fact, it is the central point of Your problem. By FCC rules, every wireless device sold to the US market MUST have its firmware locked. It can't select wifi rules from other country. As far as I know, it is the only country doing this.That's an irrelevant and extraneous question (with all due respect). Besides for the fact that Mikrotik as a brand is generally not so popular in the US market, perhaps I did try to sell it and nobody showedSo the other question is why did you buy a device for the American market, and then you didn't resell it when you moved to South Africa...
Nope. FCC is very specific and fines are stiff. A pretty good explanation, and associated rants, is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9959088 .If You were living on the USA, there was nothing You could do about it
= /interface wireless do not exist on wifiwave2"error while running customized default configuration script no such item"
I remember reading in change logs that this-or-that regulatory domain was updated up to standards.If the rules of the State change, it is not MikroTik's job to inform customers, it is assumed that they already know the law, which does not admit ignorance.
I think You misread my post...Nope. FCC is very specific and fines are stiff. A pretty good explanation, and associated rants, is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9959088 .
which hardware has this in hw-offload?WG/ChaCha lack support för HW acceleration
more details would be good.After upgrade from 7.11 to 7.11.1 many my devices can not get IP from DHCP.
Tell me, please, what could be the reason?
Downgrade to 7.11 was fix this problem.
Haven't seen this behavior on any of my devices. Could you share your config to make sure that is ok? What MikroTik do you use? Do you have firmware upgraded as well?Tell me, please, what could be the reason?
/export file=anynameyoulike
*sigh* FML 🤦🏻♂️= /interface wireless do not exist on wifiwave2
Do not worry, is the same error on defconf I report a year ago the 2022-05-04 17:10:00....
Some spam lines inside the file get-custom-defconf, never removed.
Too many lazy programmers to fix something reported dozen of times, with precise indication on how to solve...
7.5 viewtopic.php?p=955204#p955204
7.6 viewtopic.php?p=962556#p962762
7.9rc viewtopic.php?t=194993#p993491
But the MikroTik Staff (still) never gave a damn about it.
No, it's worse than I remembered, from a search already in RouteroOS 7.2.2 I reported the problem...
7.2.2 viewtopic.php?p=931147&hilit=get+custom+defconf#p931147
7.9rc viewtopic.php?p=994750&hilit=get+custom+defconf#p994750
(just checked and the garbage is still present on 7.11.1)
I guess you never heard of CI/CD with constant incremental updates with gradual rollout in waves, automatic rollbacks and integration testing.It's one of the dumbest things people can do on devices, and it applies to any software (to specify it, it was not understood) not only MikroTik ...usually my router is updating automatically
Luckily you belong to that club, so at least the first ones who try it, end up in the bag,
while the smartest ones wait a few months before updating/upgrading with a new version.
Anyway there is always someone who tries them as soon as they come out and suffers the consequences...
Let's be clear about reality.Let's be clear about where the insanity lays.
MikroTik has laid down a consistent track record; they are not an enterprise vendor.
Everyone sets their expectation; repeatedly expecting enterprise results from MikroTik is insane.
Marry the enterprise vendor that provides what you really want, whatever the cost, and don't look back.
I freely admit my MikroTik marriage is troubled but I find them charming and I have more time than money.
"Enterprise" - high margin, high reliability, high testing vendors requiring never ending licensing and support agreements but with enforceable service levels.Let's be clear about reality.
MikroTik, VyOS, Cumulus Linux are in the same segment of whatever “enterprise” means for you.
Thank you, I didn't know. I do agree producing reliable Linux based software products is quite often done. My favorite is Debian.Yet VyOS and Cumulus, both Linux based just like MikroTik has:
1. Latest kernel base compared to ROS
2. LTS/Stable channel that's actually “stable”
3. Works without any massive/major Q/A issues like ROSv7.
If VyOS and Cumulus Linux can deliver stable OS, why can't Tik do with ROSv7? ROSv6 didn't have this much stability issue.
Naming is not the problem IMO. When Mikroitk uses "stable", I take it to mean it had no serious known bugs when promoted from a "testing" release. The problem is there is not release channel (aka cisco train / git branch) that has a lower rate of changes – like "long-term" used to work in V6 (which wasn't actually very long-term sometimes, but reflected a "more stable" release).The solution is simple: "stable" channel should be renamed to Beta (as it is actually beta, regardless of what mikrotik marketing team says).
v7 is stable for a long time now.Since RouterOS v7 is stable for a long time,
[....]
There quite of few post littered in the forum about issues with upgrades after this change, some requiring netinstall in what appear to be "stable" to "stable" upgrade. Most recently here:*) lora - moved LoRa service to IoT package;
The stupid thing in this entire work, is question "WHY?" Mikrotik limit this devices to work only with RoS 7, which is not perfect, and not production ready yet, when have very stable RoS v6 that works perfectly for decades before... Why MTK not allow user to choise what RoS version and build will use for their paid hardware. Once again, when RoS 7 will be really really production ready, can discount RoS 6 for new devices.The first thing I heard in my MTCNA was "long-term is stable, stable is beta"!
Unfortunately I have to say thats so 100% true. ROSv7 is sooooooooooooooo far away from a production-ready stable. Its like they fix 2 bugs and introduce 10 new bugs with each release.
A real nasty thing is, they (how stupid can a company be!!!) retired the CCR1036 and replaced them with the CCR2116. Those come with a factory v7 pre-installed, which is NOT production-ready, which means those devices are a useless paperweight. I hope the CCR1072 is longer maintaned!
This is an anti-innovation mindset, usually smells of USSR and fascist regimes' origin.If ain't broke, don't fix it.
There will be no more development in v6, only patches for security problems.It's likely RouterOS 6 Linux kernel doesn't have new hardware support.
Back port v6 or new kernel v7 or both?
Unfortunately this is not up to Mikrotik as TILE chips are not produced any more so CCR1xxx series is finished. Only way to move forward was to switch something else and ARM is the obvious choice...A real nasty thing is, they (how stupid can a company be!!!) retired the CCR1036 and replaced them with the CCR2116. Those come with a factory v7 pre-installed, which is NOT production-ready, which means those devices are a useless paperweight. I hope the CCR1072 is longer maintaned!
and that is one of the wrongest assumptions ever made considering software development and upgrade-paths
You had one job...
I mean, that pesky routing process, it must be THE job, don't you think? Pretty ironic, all other bells&whistles worked.and that is one of the wrongest assumptions ever made considering software development and upgrade-paths
rOS v7 IMO is able to be used in prod-environment. but it is not funciton-par with v6 when it comes to avery routing aspect - for sure.I mean, that pesky routing process, it must be THE job, don't you think? Pretty ironic, all other bells&whistles worked.
It takes years to gain reputation, and only days to lose it. ROSv7 can not be considered stable and suitable for production or remote areas. It is strictly SOHO now. A shame.
And i am a huge mikrotik fan, BTW. Some hope still remains.
Perhaps something like "v7.11.2 and older 7.11.x [stable] are released!" would make sense...I do not see why 7.11.2 is not mention in the title. "and more" what is that. As it is now, its hard to see what is the latest release while visiting the forum. Please add 7.11.2 to the title of the tread.
OK. Upgrade done from package list :-)I can't upgrade my RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD to 7.11.1 and 7.11.2 I am stuck with 7.11 after reboot
You may be having the "some configuration forgotten at reboot" issue that has appeared in v7 for several people.fun fact.. lora lr8 it also forgets which server it should be using after every reboot... using "TTN v3 (eu1)" usually...
Not true.Besides, under Linux, NetInstall 7.x is broken completely and I can only NetInstall using 6.x (I did that several times).
I would say "stupid users" for not configuring some VPN to allow remote access to the device...I can only pray for those user 100 km away from the LoRa station, who will need to go by foot, air or any means and fix this on site. Poor users.
maybe you should try to set every other interface "down" on your linux host ("(sudo)ip link set [IFNAME] down") except the one which netinstall should run on and bind ip addresses on.Besides, under Linux, NetInstall 7.x is broken completely and I can only NetInstall using 6.x (I did that several times).
+1Perhaps something like "v7.11.2 and older 7.11.x [stable] are released!" would make sense...I do not see why 7.11.2 is not mention in the title. "and more" what is that. As it is now, its hard to see what is the latest release while visiting the forum. Please add 7.11.2 to the title of the tread.
Tried upgrading CHR (x86_64) from 7.10 to 7.11.2 using winbox; says it downloaded and installed and then reboots, but I'm still left with the same version.RouterOS version 7.11, 7.11.1 and 7.11.2 have been released in the "v7 stable" channel!
That appears to be exactly what the problem is. I have container, dude, gps, iot, lora and tr069-client all disabled, and for whatever reason the following are required packages?Yes, it does seem that "in-band" upgrade process downloads package files to storage area inaccessible to users.
Regarding failed upgrades ... check log, when upgrading fails it usually contains something about the reason. Often it's due to some problem with installed optional packages.
Did 7.11.2 play a part anywhere while working on the above case?7.11 or 7.11.1 broke my terminal/console in my RB4011. (Both through terminal in winbox and ssh).
But after emailing with support they convinced me to try the latest development version (v7.12beta3 atm). That fixed the problem. Now let's hope it doesn't break other stuff. :)
And what does "and more" translate to?
Yea, I also had 7.11.2 on it for a while, didn't do anything for me.Did 7.11.2 play a part anywhere while working on the above case?7.11 or 7.11.1 broke my terminal/console in my RB4011. (Both through terminal in winbox and ssh).
But after emailing with support they convinced me to try the latest development version (v7.12beta3 atm). That fixed the problem. Now let's hope it doesn't break other stuff. :)
Sometimes MT staff listen user suggestions :)I do not see why 7.11.2 is not mention in the title. "and more" what is that. As it is now, its hard to see what is the latest release while visiting the forum. Please add 7.11.2 to the title of the tread.
Even if "long-term" may be a relative term ;) ... just some add'l options for release channel be useful.Thank you MT. Now I only need a long time release ;)
IMO is worth repeating here.Before making a big commitment to a new software product; let's get the bread and butter products in order:Existing customers make or break a vendors reputation and they thrive or die from that.
- RouterOS 7 "stable" becomes truly stable (not just a label) first and foremost before all else.
- RouterOS 7 becomes feature complete first and foremost before new software products.
- Hardware products requiring RouterOS 7 features should not impact installed base.
Also having issues, no traffic going trough anymore (using mangle).OpenVPN UDP mode is broken since 7.9.2 and not fixed in 7.11.2 despite early reports that 7.11rc3 fixed something related to it.
... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)The solution is simple: "stable" channel should be renamed to Beta (as it is actually beta, regardless of what mikrotik marketing team says).
+10... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)The solution is simple: "stable" channel should be renamed to Beta (as it is actually beta, regardless of what mikrotik marketing team says).
RouterOS has so many features, most of the interconnected, depending on each other, also free updates / upgrades for 10+ years old devices, forever licenses, community support. Yeah, it also has its flaws. But for the price you get a lot of options and for many applications stable environment.
Compare this to Enterprise level solutions: no old hardware support, time and feature limited licenses, prices totally somewhere else, sometimes vendor lock-in support is a big lottery... and you still have bugs you have to live with.
Again (100th time): "stable" in the channel name does NOT refer to stability of the software (does it crash, does every feature work, etc).... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)
People who says Tik is "stable" or "working fine" must be home labbers and not medium-large network operators… Let me guess, still using layer 2 switch stacking in the distribution layer (sometimes core in clos topology), then yeah Tik is for you, Tik is "working fine" and "stable", good luck, have fun.... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)
RouterOS has so many features, most of the interconnected, depending on each other, also free updates / upgrades for 10+ years old devices, forever licenses, community support. Yeah, it also has its flaws. But for the price you get a lot of options and for many applications stable environment.
Compare this to Enterprise level solutions: no old hardware support, time and feature limited licenses, prices totally somewhere else, sometimes vendor lock-in support is a big lottery... and you still have bugs you have to live with.
TBH, i would not ever consider mikrotiks (switches) in core/distribution layer - even access layerPeople who says Tik is "stable" or "working fine" must be home labbers and not medium-large network operators… Let me guess, still using layer 2 switch stacking in the distribution layer (sometimes core in clos topology), then yeah Tik is for you, Tik is "working fine" and "stable", good luck, have fun.... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)
RouterOS has so many features, most of the interconnected, depending on each other, also free updates / upgrades for 10+ years old devices, forever licenses, community support. Yeah, it also has its flaws. But for the price you get a lot of options and for many applications stable environment.
Compare this to Enterprise level solutions: no old hardware support, time and feature limited licenses, prices totally somewhere else, sometimes vendor lock-in support is a big lottery... and you still have bugs you have to live with.
So basically we have one group who wishes that a long term version is released as soon as possible so that they can deploy v7 in their organization that has the policy of only running long term versions, and another group who wishes that first a lot of work is completed before a long term version is even attempted.I hope the improved routing filters they promised should be _IN_ before they make an LTS v7
I would say what "stable" means is a matter of opinion and is usually up to the developer to decide how the product will be named. Here they call it stable and use 3 numbers to indicate which kind of release it is - so maybe (for 1000th of time) you don't have to upgrade every time when the new version pops up - if you want to stick with your meaning of "stable version", just ignore every version which have the 3rd number and you'll be fine ;)Again (100th time): "stable" in the channel name does NOT refer to stability of the software (does it crash, does every feature work, etc).... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)
It only refers to stability of the release cycle. Do new versions appear every week, are experiments done in the released versions, etc.
For the latter, there are the "testing" and "development" channels. "stable" should be for the less adventurous users.
Oh... was that an insult attempt? :) bad news: I kinda does not have a need to compare size of pen... ehm... networks I administer with others on the Internet.People who says Tik is "stable" or "working fine" must be home labbers and not medium-large network operators… Let me guess, still using layer 2 switch stacking in the distribution layer (sometimes core in clos topology), then yeah Tik is for you, Tik is "working fine" and "stable", good luck, have fun.... and then there are (probably) thousands of us using RouterOS on dozens of devices from home applications to medium size enterprises and did not encounter any serious issue for years, so we are perfectly fine with calling it "stable" :)
RouterOS has so many features, most of the interconnected, depending on each other, also free updates / upgrades for 10+ years old devices, forever licenses, community support. Yeah, it also has its flaws. But for the price you get a lot of options and for many applications stable environment.
Compare this to Enterprise level solutions: no old hardware support, time and feature limited licenses, prices totally somewhere else, sometimes vendor lock-in support is a big lottery... and you still have bugs you have to live with.
... you don't have to upgrade every time when the new version pops up - if you want to stick with your meaning of "stable version", just ignore every version which have the 3rd number and you'll be fine...
When you want it like that, fine. But some people have the opinion that "stable" means (or suggests) that it works fine and does not crash. But that is not aligned with reality.I would say what "stable" means is a matter of opinion