Thanks updated cap ax and ax2No, not the same. Even better, and includes more fixes!
Actually, you ALSO need to upload the base ROS package to that folder or those APs simply disappear from capsman once you got a folder specified.Yes, now the rb5009 doesn't need the qcom package you will have to upload it for the ax APs for auto upgrade to work via capsman
The solution is quite simple :-) ->Upgraded RB5009 from 7.13b1.
It appears upgrade of APs (AX2 and AX3) via capsman manager does not work anymore like it used to be.
Select APs, hit "Upgrade" and nothing happens.
Log file shows an interesting entry:
0xf7f0f460 manual upgrade request failed, no file (wifi-qcom-7.13rc2-arm64.npk)
So I need to foresee that file first on RB5009 ...
Logical, when you think about it, but nevertheless something to keep in mind.
13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user MikroTikSystem from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user dircreate from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user EServicios from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user SolucTec from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadm from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user meo from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user ubnt from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user vodafone from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user webadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user manager from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user tech from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user admin2 from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user login from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admim from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user support from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
13:19:37 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
Looks for me like some kind of ransonware which has infect the PC...!?Have you very smart people any idea what program is doing this, yes this is a pc in laddys room!
Yes I have now disabled SSH
Code: Select all13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user MikroTikSystem from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user dircreate from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user EServicios from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user SolucTec from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadm from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user meo from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user ubnt from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user vodafone from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user webadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user manager from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user tech from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user admin2 from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user login from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admim from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user support from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:37 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
Google suggests it the AVG virus scanner looking for weak password on the LAN: https://support.avg.com/answers?id=9065p0000000jO6AAI#He tinkers with programing, I'll have another Word!
Thankyou
*) wifi - create first interface without number when using "name-format" provisioning setting;I just upgraded a hEX and cAPacs (with qcom-ac) to RC2. On the beta a configured CAP would show "WAP2-1" and "WAP2-2" with the suffix for the radio interface number as I used provisioning naming as "%I-". Now it shows "WAP2-" and "WAP2-2" where the 1 suffix is missing for all the WAPs.
OK change it back then. It's ugly and pointless.
True and I agree, very excited to upgrade the many cap AC and AC XL that I have installed for customers :-)
Though, this release is great. WifiWave2 (renamed to WiFi) was brought to 802.11ac devices (ARM only). It allows people to upgrade/expand old network and keep everything under one (new) CAPsMAN.
I'm not too sure about this though. With another vendor's gear, I found that some clients do not want to roam from ax to ac device (a client side issue of course). So i'm not sure mixing is a good idea. I'll try it soon anyway, maybe when Mikrotik release a wAP or a cAP that isn't the size of a frickin pizza.And, allows also to setup 802.11r/k/v roaming between all the devices - old ac ones, and new ax ones.
I'm not too sure about this though. With another vendor's gear, I found that some clients do not want to roam from ax to ac device (a client side issue of course). So i'm not sure mixing is a good idea. I'll try it soon anyway, maybe when Mikrotik release a wAP or a cAP that isn't the size of a frickin pizza.And, allows also to setup 802.11r/k/v roaming between all the devices - old ac ones, and new ax ones.
For some reason I thought wap ac was mipsbe and couldn't get new WiFi driver. Hmm.
I'm not too sure about this though. With another vendor's gear, I found that some clients do not want to roam from ax to ac device (a client side issue of course). So i'm not sure mixing is a good idea. I'll try it soon anyway, maybe when Mikrotik release a wAP or a cAP that isn't the size of a frickin pizza.
I've tested it with hAP ax³ (7.12 CAPsMAN), hAP ax² (7.12 CAP) and wAP ac (7.13beta CAP). Clients do roam between all of them. I even run wAP 5GHz radio only on 40MHz width, and it works ok. Maybe, it's based on signal strength and predicted speed based on strength - i.e. slightly worse ax signal might be preferred over ac, but not heavily worse.
My goal is, that when connection to indoors ax access point is going to die, then it roams seamlessly to outdoors ac access point, without trying to hold on to poor signal to ax AP giving just 1MBit connection. This is accomplished.
(If interested, I've already shared the config for CAPsMAN and CAP in the beta thread)
New version have ipq40xx soc inside.For some reason I thought wap ac was mipsbe and couldn't get new WiFi driver. Hmm.
I've tested it with hAP ax³ (7.12 CAPsMAN), hAP ax² (7.12 CAP) and wAP ac (7.13beta CAP). Clients do roam between all of them. I even run wAP 5GHz radio only on 40MHz width, and it works ok. Maybe, it's based on signal strength and predicted speed based on strength - i.e. slightly worse ax signal might be preferred over ac, but not heavily worse.
My goal is, that when connection to indoors ax access point is going to die, then it roams seamlessly to outdoors ac access point, without trying to hold on to poor signal to ax AP giving just 1MBit connection. This is accomplished.
(If interested, I've already shared the config for CAPsMAN and CAP in the beta thread)
Anyway cool good news and thanks for sharing
You can still do that. The configuration on the cap side is a bit special but that only matters if you are configuring yourself instead of caps-mode defaults (I posted about my difficulties getting this working, but got there in the end). I did struggle a bit though and an not super eager to have to do it again without more practice so I remember better .Sorry if dumb question.
I have multiple CAP AC devices. Before this would run with capsman, multiple SSIDs with each SSID on their own vlan. Practically different datapaths, security, etc configured in capsman. So far i've just managed cap AX devices individually, and kept cap AC devices under capsman. So like many very excited at the possibility to manage under a single capsman going forward.
As I understand the vlans i've done via capsman no longer work if I use the new capsman under wifi with 7.13. Is this considered 'as it will be' when released, or is there efforts ongoing to bring this functionality into capsman on the wifi packagee?
Trying to understand if I should start finding a solution to this limitation, or should just hold out for future releases with that functionality.
That's why you using 16MB flash, later you regretting it. :DRouterOS version 7.13rc has been released on the "v7 testing" channel!
Notice - Starting from RouterOS version 7.13, significant changes have been made to the RouterOS wireless packages. This is done due to a new product developemnt which will require more disk space for hardware drivers so we had to split it in order to maintain old products alongside the new ones. More wireless packages are yet to come.
A downgrade to 7.13beta3 on the cap ax "fixed" it for now.I have one issue with my cap ax wifi which is controlled by my capsman controller on my hex s.
Some devices aren't placed in the correct vlan. In this screenshot you can see two devices which are connected to the same interface / ssid:
Screenshot_20231203_190437.png
One device got placed into the correct vlan-id and the other got no vlan-id.
Just WPA2-PSK without any dynamic vlan assignment.
This issue only happens on my cap ax, my hap ax2 fine.
Also this only happens on exactly this ssid, the two other ssids are not affected.
# 12: 12 > wgclient_12.conf
[Interface]
Address = 10.255.2.12/24
DNS = 10.255.2.1
PrivateKey = 0C7w3meByHk1VQ2mu9QnbiUtcWdH2joB/aJFateQ6UE=
MTU = 1280
[Peer]
PublicKey = lVaGrM7TX/H1yPG5ZuwJvclWtaE+a1XwWYeS5to/CwU=
PresharedKey = 6AZ6Mvl+z1L2eKgifQrsi/tWPSN+mcsO+QjSmwTSJUs=
AllowedIPs = 10.255.2.0/24, 192.168.0.0/16
Endpoint = my-endpoint:51820
PersistentKeepalive = 25
Yes, this is malware. I came across it something like ten years ago on a few customer PCs when I was running our WISP. Common AV packages including Malwarebytes could not detect it, and since it was on the customers' PCs, I was not able to take it into the shop for a deep dive.Have you very smart people any idea what program is doing this, yes this is a pc in laddys room!
Yes I have now disabled SSH
Code: Select all13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:26 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user MikroTikSystem from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:27 system,error,critical login failure for user dircreate from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user EServicios from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user SolucTec from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:28 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadm from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user meo from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:29 system,error,critical login failure for user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user ubnt from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:30 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:31 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user vodafone from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user Administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:32 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user webadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user user from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user Admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user administrator from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:33 system,error,critical login failure for user sysadmin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user guest from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user manager from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user tech from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user admin2 from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:34 system,error,critical login failure for user login from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admim from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user support from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:35 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:36 system,error,critical login failure for user admin from 192.168.0.188 via ssh 13:19:37 system,error,critical login failure for user root from 192.168.0.188 via ssh
It's something that i am also interested in. Support for WDS meshing should be on MikroTik's priority list for the new Wifi package, especially for the Audience use-case. In my opinion it could be possible, since in 7.12 there is already support for station-bridge mode, so the "road" is pretty much laid out in front. That being said, you could do a workaround for the mesh setup, using a PtMP topology where you select a well placed (centrally placed) device in AP mode and the other satellites in station-bridge mode.Question about the wifiwave2 repartitioning:
Is any of this going to fix the issue where on an Audience, you can get WPA3 or you can get meshing, but you can't get both?
If not, is it because the task is impossible due to hardware/protocol limitations, or possible but just not coded for?
That should be no problem. The config is auto-generated by a script, so it should be fine.Possibly an address clash? You habe 10.255.2.0/24 for interface and allowed-ips inside the tunnel.
You should file a support ticket with a supout.rif from router, that should have details on the crash for Mikrotik. It could be the line endings, or the "#" comment...dunno, but agree it shouldn't crashThat should be no problem. The config is auto-generated by a script, so it should be fine.Possibly an address clash? You habe 10.255.2.0/24 for interface and allowed-ips inside the tunnel.
And even if it was invalid, the router crashing is certainly not the right way to tell me that.
Same behaviour for me with a CCR2004-1G12S+2XSwith 7.13rc2 on CCR2216, with ipv4 HWl3 offload and bgp routing, lead to unexpected reboot without any log or autosupout, we had to downgrade to 7.12.1
You should ask Support.When the problem with the absence of the following path attributes in bgp update will be fixed:
1. EXTENDED_COMMUNITIES
2. MP_REACH_NLRI
The problem affects only routers based on the ARM64 architecture.
I have opened appeal SUP-136441. There is a feeling that their support system simply cannot withstand such a load. Maybe they need to fix the problems in sections? And do not take on everything at once, which leads to a large number of problems and customer dissatisfaction.You should ask Support.When the problem with the absence of the following path attributes in bgp update will be fixed:
1. EXTENDED_COMMUNITIES
2. MP_REACH_NLRI
The problem affects only routers based on the ARM64 architecture.
Interesting that we have a similar setup and different experience. I suspect it was the failure of the Adguard container that possibly caused all the slowness but nothing in logs, I need to revisit that component next time.I upgraded my RB5009 last friday, also acting as capsman, incl AX2 and AX3.
On that RB5009 are also some containers running (amongst them PiHole).
I had zero problems with that upgrade.
One exception: upgrade via capsman of the cap devices was not possible until I specified an upgrade path and the necessary files on RB5009.
This is a consequence of the split of wireless drivers from the base package so on itself logical.
Sorry, but this is a pointless post.When will they fix MLAG?
viewtopic.php?p=1040526#p1040526Sorry, but this is a pointless post.When will they fix MLAG?
No one can help you here without information about what is not working with MLAG, nor what your config looks like :-/
I am thinking of FS currently yes as an alternative. Unfortunately I did not do enough research into this and I was saying oh we can get MLAG for cheap to my boss.Regarding MLAG: MT is an excellent Router vendor, but they make lousy Switches. Use another vendor (like FS, D-Link...) for device-overlapping aggregation-groups. MT screwed that in such an overcomplicated way up, it seems they (itself) are unabled to fix it. Same with the "Loopback Detection", not fixable, just screwed up... my ticket is open for months.
On hAP ac² with wifi-qcom-ac I have:What's new in 7.13rc3 (2023-Dec-06 17:16):
2023-12-07 13:02:57 system,error,critical error while running customized default configuration script: no such item
2023-12-07 13:02:57 system,error,critical
2023-12-07 13:03:33 system,error,critical error while running customized default configuration script: invalid internal item number
2023-12-07 13:03:33 system,error,critical
2023-12-07 12:20:13 system,error,critical error while running customized default
configuration script: no such item
2023-12-07 12:20:13 system,error,critical
interface/wifi/monitor 0,1,2,3
state: running running running running
channel: 5500/ax/Ceee 2412/ax 5745/ax/Ceee 2462/ax
registered-peers: 0 0 2 1
authorized-peers: 0 0 2 1
tx-power: 22 14 9 15
available-channels: 5500/ax/Ceee 2412/ax 5745/ax/Ceee 2462/a
RouterOS 7.13rc2, without errors.What previous RouterOS version where you running, @eworm?
Is it even defconf? In @eworm case, it sounds like it was after a version upgrade...not the /system/default-configuration. Maybe it's crossfig (or whatever does config upgrade) since that only happen once too... If that's case, then the error message is kinda lousy (e.g. it's not the "default", but "current" config, that failed to upgrade).Error about defconf generation process is just an outcome of many possible reasons.
[eworm@MikroTik] > /interface/wifi/print proplist=name,default-name where default-name
Flags: M - MASTER; B - BOUND; R - RUNNING
Columns: NAME, DEFAULT-NAME
# NAME DEFAULT-NAME
6 MB wl2-intern wifi1
15 MBR wl5-intern wifi2
I've not renamed mine just to let you know, Also I've not seen a repeat of the error after rebooting mine either.That's my understanding of the issue, yes. But as we do not have the crossfig script code we can not verify...
But adding one note here... My wifi interface do not have default names, I renamed all of them. Perhaps that's a problem?
Code like this should always work with the default-name property...Code: Select all[eworm@MikroTik] > /interface/wifi/print proplist=name,default-name where default-name Flags: M - MASTER; B - BOUND; R - RUNNING Columns: NAME, DEFAULT-NAME # NAME DEFAULT-NAME 6 MB wl2-intern wifi1 15 MBR wl5-intern wifi2
Thanks for your thoughts Strods.Error about defconf generation process is just an outcome of many possible reasons. Simply "hey, there was some kind of error". As you can see in changelogs, defconf is updated quite often. This error only says "there was something wrong here". It is not a single issue. Quite often also it is possible to get such an error, for example, on 1/100 specific model devices simply because loading the system took a longer time, etc. We are looking into this and trying to figure out what kind of issue (or issues) it is this time. As always - proper way how to report bugs is through support@mikrotik.com. This is a user forum where simply MikroTik employees also like to be present.
/interface wifi channel
add disabled=no name=channel1
/interface wifi datapath
add bridge=bridge disabled=no name=datapath1 vlan-id=22
/interface wifi configuration
add channel=channel1 country=Sweden datapath=datapath1 datapath.bridge=bridge .interface-list=datapath-home disabled=no mode=ap name=cfg1 ssid=test
/interface wifi cap
set enabled=yes
/interface wifi capsman
set enabled=yes interfaces=vlan0025 package-path=/firmware require-peer-certificate=no upgrade-policy=require-same-version
/interface wifi provisioning
add action=create-dynamic-enabled disabled=no master-configuration=cfg1 name-format=%I-%r
Thanks for the update Strods.Hopefully, we have managed to reproduce the same problem with "defconf" generation for AX routers. It is a cosmetic, harmless issue that can occur randomly on any upgrade/downgrade, package installation/removal. We will try to fix it in upcoming RouterOS releases. The error has nothing to do with 7.13 (if you see it on AX router).
Name : WiFi
Description : Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6E AX210 160MHz
GUID :
Physical address : a0:80
Interface type : Primary
State : connected
SSID : 02
BSSID : 18:fd
Network type : Infrastructure
Radio type : 802.11ax
Authentication : WPA2-Personal
Cipher : CCMP
Connection mode : Auto Connect
Band : 5 GHz
Channel : 36
Receive rate (Mbps) : 1201
Transmit rate (Mbps) : 1201
Signal : 87%
Profile : 02
Flags: A - AUTHORIZED
Columns: INTERFACE, SSID, MAC-ADDRESS, UPTIME, SIGNAL
# INTERFACE SSID MAC-ADDRESS UPTIME SIGNAL
0 A wifi2 01 C0:4A:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m55s -52
1 A wifi1 02 A0:80:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m51s -46
2 A wifi1 02 84:2A:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m43s -55
3 A cap-wifi2 01 60:6B:XX:XX:XX:XX 21h37m18s -66
4 A wifi2 01 1C:56:XX:XX:XX:XX 17h8m35s -38
5 A cap-wifi1 01 AE:6B:XX:XX:XX:XX 16h57m54s -49
6 A cap-wifi1 01 6C:A1:XX:XX:XX:XX 16h26m14s -58
7 A wifi1 02 7E:40:XX:XX:XX:XX 2h7m48s -53
status: done
time-remaining: 0s
ping-min-avg-max: 1.73ms / 2.20ms / 3.11ms
jitter-min-avg-max: 1us / 165us / 844us
loss: 0% (0/200)
tcp-download: 907Mbps local-cpu-load:86%
tcp-upload: 923Mbps local-cpu-load:40% remote-cpu-load:0%
status: udp download
time-remaining: 18s
ping-min-avg-max: 1.73ms / 2.22ms / 3.13ms
jitter-min-avg-max: 2us / 156us / 857us
loss: 0% (0/200)
tcp-download: 923Mbps local-cpu-load:85%
tcp-upload: 895Mbps local-cpu-load:42% remote-cpu-load:0%
status: udp download
time-remaining: 17s
ping-min-avg-max: 1.78ms / 2.24ms / 3.31ms
jitter-min-avg-max: 1us / 146us / 1.07ms
loss: 0% (0/200)
tcp-download: 874Mbps local-cpu-load:82%
tcp-upload: 919Mbps local-cpu-load:41% remote-cpu-load:0%
My traceroute [v0.95]
Holy-moly (172.28.106.170) -> pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com (80.249.99.164) 2023-12-08T11:28:34+0000
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
Packets Pings
Host Drop Rcv Avg Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint
1. 172.28.96.1 0 52 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6
2. 192.168.0.254 0 52 2.5 2.5 0.3 0.2 0.6 3.0
3. (waiting for reply)
4. 80.3.67.129 0 52 12.3 11.8 0.2 2.8 30.7 48.7
5. (waiting for reply)
6. 62.254.42.174 6 46 15.4 15.1 0.3 2.9 18.9 45.0
7. (waiting for reply)
8. 84.116.136.98 0 52 14.9 14.7 3.4 1.9 19.9 29.5
9. 129.250.66.101 0 52 15.6 15.3 4.7 2.8 17.2 42.7
10. 129.250.3.214 1 50 17.3 16.6 0.7 4.6 25.3 76.7
11. 129.250.3.251 0 52 16.2 15.7 15.8 3.8 25.8 50.4
12. 192.80.16.146 0 51 15.5 15.3 2.1 2.0 10.5 36.7
13. 80.249.97.72 0 51 15.9 15.7 1.8 2.4 15.3 50.2
14. 80.249.97.90 0 51 15.5 15.4 1.0 1.5 8.9 18.4
15. 80.249.99.164 0 51 15.6 15.6 2.0 1.1 5.8 15.1
====== WAVEFORM.COM BUFFERBLOAT TEST RESULTS======
Test Version,1.0.8
Test
Unix
====== RESULTS SUMMARY ======
Bufferbloat Grade,A+
====== RESULTS SUMMARY ======
Mean Unloaded Latency (ms),17.3
Increase In Mean Latency During Download Test (ms),2.83
Increase In Mean During Upload Test (ms),0
Download speed (Mbps),242.979
Upload speed (Mbps),24.113
====== LATENCY TEST DETAIL ======
Unloaded - Median Latency (ms),15.96
Unloaded - 95th %ile Latency (ms),25.54
Unloaded - Mean Latency (ms),17.3
During Download - Median Latency (ms),18.73
During Download - 95th %ile Latency (ms),34.57
During Download - Mean Latency (ms),20.13
During Upload - Median Latency (ms),15.11
During Upload - 95th %ile Latency (ms),20.59
During Upload - Mean Latency (ms),15.65
===== BUFFERBLOAT IMPACT ======
Web Browsing,PASS,PASS
Audio Calls,PASS,PASS
4K Video Streaming,PASS,PASS
Video Conferencing,PASS,PASS
Low Latency Gaming,PASS,PASS
What kind of test is it?Tests over WiFi to prove it should anybody wish to take a look.
Code: Select allName : WiFi Description : Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6E AX210 160MHz GUID : Physical address : a0:80 Interface type : Primary State : connected SSID : 02 BSSID : 18:fd Network type : Infrastructure Radio type : 802.11ax Authentication : WPA2-Personal Cipher : CCMP Connection mode : Auto Connect Band : 5 GHz Channel : 36 Receive rate (Mbps) : 1201 Transmit rate (Mbps) : 1201 Signal : 87% Profile : 02 Flags: A - AUTHORIZED Columns: INTERFACE, SSID, MAC-ADDRESS, UPTIME, SIGNAL # INTERFACE SSID MAC-ADDRESS UPTIME SIGNAL 0 A wifi2 01 C0:4A:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m55s -52 1 A wifi1 02 A0:80:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m51s -46 2 A wifi1 02 84:2A:XX:XX:XX:XX 22h4m43s -55 3 A cap-wifi2 01 60:6B:XX:XX:XX:XX 21h37m18s -66 4 A wifi2 01 1C:56:XX:XX:XX:XX 17h8m35s -38 5 A cap-wifi1 01 AE:6B:XX:XX:XX:XX 16h57m54s -49 6 A cap-wifi1 01 6C:A1:XX:XX:XX:XX 16h26m14s -58 7 A wifi1 02 7E:40:XX:XX:XX:XX 2h7m48s -53 status: done time-remaining: 0s ping-min-avg-max: 1.73ms / 2.20ms / 3.11ms jitter-min-avg-max: 1us / 165us / 844us loss: 0% (0/200) tcp-download: 907Mbps local-cpu-load:86% tcp-upload: 923Mbps local-cpu-load:40% remote-cpu-load:0% status: udp download time-remaining: 18s ping-min-avg-max: 1.73ms / 2.22ms / 3.13ms jitter-min-avg-max: 2us / 156us / 857us loss: 0% (0/200) tcp-download: 923Mbps local-cpu-load:85% tcp-upload: 895Mbps local-cpu-load:42% remote-cpu-load:0% status: udp download time-remaining: 17s ping-min-avg-max: 1.78ms / 2.24ms / 3.31ms jitter-min-avg-max: 1us / 146us / 1.07ms loss: 0% (0/200) tcp-download: 874Mbps local-cpu-load:82% tcp-upload: 919Mbps local-cpu-load:41% remote-cpu-load:0% My traceroute [v0.95] Holy-moly (172.28.106.170) -> pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com (80.249.99.164) 2023-12-08T11:28:34+0000 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Drop Rcv Avg Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint 1. 172.28.96.1 0 52 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 2. 192.168.0.254 0 52 2.5 2.5 0.3 0.2 0.6 3.0 3. (waiting for reply) 4. 80.3.67.129 0 52 12.3 11.8 0.2 2.8 30.7 48.7 5. (waiting for reply) 6. 62.254.42.174 6 46 15.4 15.1 0.3 2.9 18.9 45.0 7. (waiting for reply) 8. 84.116.136.98 0 52 14.9 14.7 3.4 1.9 19.9 29.5 9. 129.250.66.101 0 52 15.6 15.3 4.7 2.8 17.2 42.7 10. 129.250.3.214 1 50 17.3 16.6 0.7 4.6 25.3 76.7 11. 129.250.3.251 0 52 16.2 15.7 15.8 3.8 25.8 50.4 12. 192.80.16.146 0 51 15.5 15.3 2.1 2.0 10.5 36.7 13. 80.249.97.72 0 51 15.9 15.7 1.8 2.4 15.3 50.2 14. 80.249.97.90 0 51 15.5 15.4 1.0 1.5 8.9 18.4 15. 80.249.99.164 0 51 15.6 15.6 2.0 1.1 5.8 15.1 ====== WAVEFORM.COM BUFFERBLOAT TEST RESULTS====== Test Version,1.0.8 Test Unix ====== RESULTS SUMMARY ====== Bufferbloat Grade,A+ ====== RESULTS SUMMARY ====== Mean Unloaded Latency (ms),17.3 Increase In Mean Latency During Download Test (ms),2.83 Increase In Mean During Upload Test (ms),0 Download speed (Mbps),242.979 Upload speed (Mbps),24.113 ====== LATENCY TEST DETAIL ====== Unloaded - Median Latency (ms),15.96 Unloaded - 95th %ile Latency (ms),25.54 Unloaded - Mean Latency (ms),17.3 During Download - Median Latency (ms),18.73 During Download - 95th %ile Latency (ms),34.57 During Download - Mean Latency (ms),20.13 During Upload - Median Latency (ms),15.11 During Upload - 95th %ile Latency (ms),20.59 During Upload - Mean Latency (ms),15.65 ===== BUFFERBLOAT IMPACT ====== Web Browsing,PASS,PASS Audio Calls,PASS,PASS 4K Video Streaming,PASS,PASS Video Conferencing,PASS,PASS Low Latency Gaming,PASS,PASS
BufferBloat test is for testing of Quality of Service - clients (or connections), that are trying to eat all the bandwidth of specific resource, shouldn't harm latency of other clients (or connections).What kind of test is it?
Is this about an AC with new drivers? I've same behaviour, but only by using a WAP AC and wifi-qcom-ac. The AX2 is working right.I the new version of capsman, how do we connect a datapath to a vlan in a bridge? I get the following error and its documented, but I don seem to get any traffic trough by adding wifi interface a a bridge port or using the interface list option.
;;; client was disconnected because could not assign VLAN, maximum VLAN count for interface was reached
This looks very much like a firewall issue… Did you allow the ports used for wireguard?CCR2116, WireGuard isn't working, replaced it with ZeroTier, in details:
- delete and re-add the peer may solve the problem but once you disconnect you can't connect back.
- It shows 94bytes received, 'Handshake did not complete after 5 seconds'
- Same behavior on iPhone, iPad, Windows and MacOS
- This problem is only on connecting remotely on 'WAN', while if the device is present on LAN WireGuard works flawlessly connection get established/handshake without any problem.
- Tried to downgrade and netinstall, and that did not fix the problem.
I can't rule out human error 100% (?misconfiguration), and for this reason I'm asking for any known or reported bugs.
/interface bridge
add name=loopback port-cost-mode=short
/interface wireguard
add listen-port=13231 mtu=1420 name=wireguard1
/interface vlan
add interface=sfp-sfpplus4 name=GPON vlan-id=10
/interface bonding
add mode=802.3ad name=bonding1 slaves=sfp-sfpplus1,sfp-sfpplus2,sfp-sfpplus3 transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3
/interface pppoe-client
add add-default-route=yes disabled=no interface=GPON name=pppoe-out1 user=1blalbaa
/interface ethernet switch
set 0 l3-hw-offloading=yes
/interface list
add name=WAN
add name=LAN
/interface wireless security-profiles
set [ find default=yes ] supplicant-identity=MikroTik
/ip pool
add name=openvpn-pool ranges=10.100.100.11-10.100.100.99
/port
set 0 name=serial0
/routing ospf instance
add disabled=no name=ospf-instance-1 originate-default=always redistribute=connected
/routing ospf area
add disabled=no instance=ospf-instance-1 name=ospf-area-1
/system logging action
set 3 remote=10.10.10.10 src-address=10.0.0.1
/zerotier
set zt1 comment="ZeroTier Central controller - https://my.zerotier.com/" name=zt1 port=9993
/zerotier interface
add allow-default=no allow-global=no allow-managed=yes disabled=no instance=zt1 name=zerotier1 network=272f5eae16897148
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
set discover-interface-list=all
/interface detect-internet
set detect-interface-list=all internet-interface-list=all lan-interface-list=all wan-interface-list=all
/interface list member
add interface=pppoe-out1 list=WAN
add interface=bonding1 list=LAN
add interface=ether12 list=LAN
add interface=zerotier1 list=LAN
add interface=wireguard1 list=LAN
/interface ovpn-server server
set auth=sha1 certificate=*2 cipher=aes128-gcm,aes192-gcm,aes256-gcm port=443 require-client-certificate=yes
/interface wireguard peers
add allowed-address=10.100.100.2/32 interface=wireguard1 public-key="+L9oHVFkifH9GLf+25zNEt+blablabla="
/ip address
add address=192.168.88.1/24 interface=ether13 network=192.168.88.0
add address=10.255.255.1/30 interface=bonding1 network=10.255.255.0
add address=10.255.255.21/30 interface=ether12 network=10.255.255.20
add address=10.0.0.1 interface=loopback network=10.0.0.1
add address=10.100.100.1/24 interface=wireguard1 network=10.100.100.0
/ip cloud
set ddns-enabled=yes
/ip dns
set allow-remote-requests=yes servers=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4,1.1.1.1,1.0.0.1
/ip firewall address-list
add list=bogons
add address=0.0.0.0/8 list=bogons
add address=10.0.0.0/8 list=bogons
add address=100.64.0.0/10 list=bogons
add address=127.0.0.0/8 list=bogons
add address=127.0.53.53 list=bogons
add address=169.254.0.0/16 list=bogons
add address=172.16.0.0/12 list=bogons
add address=192.0.0.0/24 list=bogons
add address=192.0.2.0/24 list=bogons
add address=192.168.0.0/16 list=bogons
add address=198.18.0.0/15 list=bogons
add address=198.51.100.0/24 list=bogons
add address=203.0.113.0/24 list=bogons
add address=224.0.0.0/4 list=bogons
add address=240.0.0.0/4 list=bogons
add address=255.255.255.255 list=bogons
add address=10.10.10.0/24 list=LAN
add address=10.10.20.0/24 list=LAN
add address=10.10.80.0/24 list=LAN
add address=10.10.90.0/24 list=LAN
add address=10.20.10.0/24 list=LAN
add address=10.100.100.0/24 list=LAN
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="allow WireGuard" dst-port=13231 protocol=udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="allow WireGuard traffic" src-address=10.100.100.0/24
add action=accept chain=forward in-interface=zerotier1
add action=accept chain=input in-interface=zerotier1
add action=accept chain=input connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=input protocol=udp src-address=127.0.0.1
add action=drop chain=input connection-state=invalid log-prefix="input invalid blocked"
add action=accept chain=input protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input in-interface-list=LAN protocol=ospf
add action=accept chain=input in-interface-list=LAN src-address=10.10.20.0/24
add action=accept chain=input in-interface-list=LAN
add action=drop chain=input log-prefix="input drop"
add action=fasttrack-connection chain=forward connection-state=established,related hw-offload=yes
add action=accept chain=forward connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=forward connection-state=invalid log-prefix="forward invalid block"
add action=accept chain=forward in-interface-list=LAN out-interface-list=WAN
add action=drop chain=forward connection-nat-state=!dstnat connection-state=new in-interface-list=WAN log-prefix="not natted"
add action=jump chain=forward jump-target=icmp protocol=icmp
add action=drop chain=forward log-prefix="forward drop"
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=0:0 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=3:0 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=3:1 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=3:4 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=8:0 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=11:0 protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=icmp icmp-options=12:0 protocol=icmp
add action=drop chain=icmp
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface-list=WAN
/ip firewall service-port
set ftp disabled=yes
set tftp disabled=yes
set h323 disabled=yes
set sip disabled=yes
set pptp disabled=yes
/ip service
set telnet disabled=yes
set ftp disabled=yes
set api disabled=yes
set api-ssl disabled=yes
/routing ospf interface-template
add area=ospf-area-1 disabled=no interfaces=bonding1 type=ptp
add area=ospf-area-1 disabled=no interfaces=ether12 type=ptp
/snmp
set enabled=yes
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Universal
/system logging
add action=remote topics=pppoe,!debug
add action=remote topics=info
add topics=wireguard,debug
/system note
set show-at-login=no
/system ntp client
set enabled=yes
/system ntp server
set enabled=yes
/system ntp client servers
add address=pool.ntp.org
add address=time.google.com
add address=time.cloudflare.com
/system package update
set channel=testing
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="allow WireGuard" dst-port=13231 protocol=udp in-interface=pppoe-out1
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="allow WireGuard" dst-port=13231 in-interface=pppoe-out1 protocol=udp
add action=accept chain=input comment="allow WireGuard traffic" src-address=10.100.100.0/24
add action=accept chain=input connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=input protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input in-interface-list=LAN
add action=drop chain=input disabled=yes log-prefix="input drop"
add action=fasttrack-connection chain=forward connection-state=established,related hw-offload=yes
add action=accept chain=forward connection-state=established,related,untracked
add action=accept chain=forward in-interface-list=LAN out-interface-list=WAN
add action=drop chain=forward connection-nat-state=!dstnat connection-state=new disabled=yes in-interface-list=WAN log-prefix="not natted"
add action=drop chain=forward disabled=yes log-prefix="forward drop"
[NET] UDP bind has been updated
2023-12-09 15:19:34.977
[NET] Routine: receive incoming v6 - started
2023-12-09 15:19:34.977
[NET] Routine: receive incoming v4 - started
2023-12-09 15:19:34.990
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Sending handshake initiation
2023-12-09 15:19:35.053
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Received handshake response
2023-12-09 15:19:39.520
[APP] Status update notification timeout for tunnel 'secretgarden'. Tunnel status is now 'connected'.
2023-12-09 15:19:50.467
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Retrying handshake because we stopped hearing back after 15 seconds
2023-12-09 15:19:50.468
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Sending handshake initiation
2023-12-09 15:19:55.653
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Handshake did not complete after 5 seconds, retrying (try 2)
2023-12-09 15:19:55.653
[NET] peer(oBoa…GpVM) - Sending handshake initiation
Yes its AC, cap AC models are used. I didnt find any config information in the help section. I have tried to add caps wifi port manual to the bridge as any other bridged port but dont get any traffic.Is this about an AC with new drivers? I've same behaviour, but only by using a WAP AC and wifi-qcom-ac. The AX2 is working right.
Do you see the counter of the accept rule increasing?removed all unnecessary filters, and disabled all drops for testing.
Looks like your ISP is blocking the protocol by DPI can you make connections to other WG servers?CCR2116, WireGuard isn't working, replaced it with ZeroTier, in details:
- delete and re-add the peer may solve the problem but once you disconnect you can't connect back.
- It shows 94bytes received, 'Handshake did not complete after 5 seconds'
- Same behavior on iPhone, iPad, Windows and MacOS
- This problem is only on connecting remotely on 'WAN', while if the device is present on LAN WireGuard works flawlessly connection get established/handshake without any problem.
- Tried to downgrade and netinstall, and that did not fix the problem.
I can't rule out human error 100% (?misconfiguration), and for this reason I'm asking for any known or reported bugs.
name="pppoe-out1"
max-mtu=auto
max-mru=auto
mrru=disabled
interface=sfp-sfpplus1
user="username"
password="password"
profile=default
keepalive-timeout=10
service-name=""
ac-name=""
add-default-route=yes
default-route-distance=1
dial-on-demand=no
use-peer-dns=no
allow=pap,chap,mschap1,mschap2
name: sfp-sfpplus1
status: link-ok
auto-negotiation: done
rate: 1Gbps
full-duplex: yes
tx-flow-control: no
rx-flow-control: no
supported: 10M-baseT-half,10M-baseT-full,
100M-baseT-half,100M-baseT-full,
1G-baseT-half,1G-baseT-full,1G-baseX,
2.5G-baseT,2.5G-baseX,5G-baseT,10G-baseT,
10G-baseSR-LR,10G-baseCR
sfp-supported: 10M-baseT-half,10M-baseT-full,
100M-baseT-half,100M-baseT-full,
1G-baseT-half,1G-baseT-full
advertising: 10M-baseT-half,10M-baseT-full,
100M-baseT-half,100M-baseT-full,
1G-baseT-half,1G-baseT-full
link-partner-advertising:
sfp-module-present: yes
sfp-rx-loss: no
sfp-tx-fault: no
sfp-type: SFP/SFP+/SFP28/SFP56
sfp-connector-type: RJ45
sfp-link-length-copper-active-om4: 100m
sfp-vendor-name: FS
sfp-vendor-part-number: SFP-GB-GE-T
sfp-vendor-serial: S2001339604
sfp-manufacturing-date: 20-01-10
eeprom-checksum: good
eeprom: 0000: 03 04 22 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 01 0d 00 00 00 .."..... ........
0010: 00 00 64 00 46 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ..d.FS
0020: 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 00 53 46 50 2d 47 42 2d 47 .... SFP-GB-G
0030: 45 2d 54 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 f5 E-T ....
0040: 00 00 00 00 53 32 30 30 31 33 33 39 36 30 34 20 ....S200 1339604
0050: 20 20 20 20 32 30 30 31 31 30 20 20 00 00 00 53 2001 10 ...S
0060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
name: sfp-sfpplus1
status: no-link
auto-negotiation: done
supported: 10M-baseT-half,10M-baseT-full,
100M-baseT-half,100M-baseT-full,
1G-baseT-half,1G-baseT-full,1G-baseX,
2.5G-baseT,2.5G-baseX,5G-baseT,10G-baseT,
10G-baseSR-LR,10G-baseCR
sfp-supported: 1G-baseX
advertising: 1G-baseX
link-partner-advertising:
sfp-module-present: yes
sfp-rx-loss: no
sfp-tx-fault: no
sfp-type: SFP/SFP+/SFP28/SFP56
sfp-connector-type: RJ45
sfp-link-length-copper-active-om4: 100m
sfp-vendor-name: FS
sfp-vendor-part-number: SFP-GB-GE-T
sfp-vendor-serial: S2001339604
sfp-manufacturing-date: 20-01-10
eeprom-checksum: good
eeprom: 0000: 03 04 22 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 01 0d 00 00 00 .."..... ........
0010: 00 00 64 00 46 53 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ..d.FS
0020: 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 00 53 46 50 2d 47 42 2d 47 .... SFP-GB-G
0030: 45 2d 54 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 f5 E-T ....
0040: 00 00 00 00 53 32 30 30 31 33 33 39 36 30 34 20 ....S200 1339604
0050: 20 20 20 20 32 30 30 31 31 30 20 20 00 00 00 53 2001 10 ...S
0060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
every problem reported supout will be first ask by MT.
but not all problem can be captured in supout if we generated after rebooted.
and not all the supout can be generated when problem occurs.
question: sometime we see autosupout file in the router, anyone knows when exactly autosupout generated?
and can autosupout use for MT to find the problem when the routers hangs or before rebooted?
thx
It works by using an AX AP. I've same behaviour by using an AC AP and new driver wifi-qcom-ac. You can make it work by configuring the bridge vlans AND by activating vlan filtering on the CAP.Yes its AC, cap AC models are used. I didnt find any config information in the help section. I have tried to add caps wifi port manual to the bridge as any other bridged port but dont get any traffic.
Yes, doing that will work... But in a scenario such mine (or others) where you've a hundred of AC APs it's hard to reconfigure manually all of them.I have a wAP AC running 7.13rc2 and I have no issues but I do use bridge with VLAN filtering on and have made the dynamic interfaces static on the wAP AC so I could add them to the bridge and they do not disappear every time I reboot the device. Works like a charm. All this under new CapsMAN working together with cAP AX.
I hope the solve the VLAN thing on AC interfaces but for now it works at least.
wifi1 and wifi2 can be automatically added to the bridge setting the interface datapath but, when you add a slave configuration on the CAPSMAN, another wireless interface is created and that one must be made static and added to the bridge with bridge filtering enabled to works. On the old CAPSMAN it was automatically added to the bridge with vlan tagged and there was no need to enable the vlan filtering on it (the switch was used as a dumb one).@glat I have always used the bridge to manage VLAN so this was not a problem for me but I do need to add each WIFI interface, main or slave, as a port in the bridge.
Yes, I hope this will be corrected because we've a lot of installed ARM APs that can benefit of all new features, but if you need an additional SSID they cannot be migrated... On a single SSID they works, even.I agree if we want to migrate in large scale I think getting it to works like the AX interfaces would be great. Not sure this will help you as I think AX interfaces reply on a bridge.
Yes, runs really nicely for me: Packages -> wireless -> uninstall. Files -> add wifi-qcom-ac. Reboot. Connect over cable, fix ports in the bridge, new interfaces are wifi1 and wifi2. Configure basic stuff using oneliner from https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... figuration:Quick question before I waste more time: Is RBcAPGi-5acD2nD (cAP ac) supported by wifi-qcom-ac ?
Thanks for you reply. Meanwhile I can confirm it working. Some devices where affected and after I netinstalled them, they work nicely with the "new CAPsMan"Yes, runs really nicely for me: Packages -> wireless -> uninstall. Files -> add wifi-qcom-ac. Reboot. Connect over cable, fix ports in the bridge, new interfaces are wifi1 and wifi2. Configure basic stuff using oneliner from https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... figuration:Quick question before I waste more time: Is RBcAPGi-5acD2nD (cAP ac) supported by wifi-qcom-ac ?
Because it's a feature that doesn't work as expected, besides the discussion regarding the usefulness of this feature.how is this a bug? The order doesn’t matter - at all.
There is also no equivalent brctl command to do that in linux.
Except the VLAN problem. E.g. CAP AX device work well with vlan-id set in "/interface wifi datapath", CAP AC bring up an error message not supported by device. I read something about that above, but found no solution yet.Thanks for you reply. Meanwhile I can confirm it working. Some devices where affected and after I netinstalled them, they work nicely with the "new CAPsMan"
Yes, runs really nicely for me: Packages -> wireless -> uninstall. Files -> add wifi-qcom-ac. Reboot. Connect over cable, fix ports in the bridge, new interfaces are wifi1 and wifi2. Configure basic stuff using oneliner from https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... figuration:
Maybe or maybe not. I observed an issue with ordering of bridge ports on 7.12.1 - viewtopic.php?p=1041276how is this a bug? The order doesn’t matter - at all.
There is also no equivalent brctl command to do that in linux.
Unlikely, but try changing the port number. Btw, this is OT thus please create a new thread to continue troubleshooting.Confirmed, WireGuard is blocked by ISP.
Some description is available in bridge interface setup part of bridging manual.Is there any difference in the logic of the modes (long or short)? or does it differ only in reflection ?
Just noticed multiple reports about WireGuard failing to connect on the same ISP; you can disregard my previous comments about any possible bug on 7.13rc3.Unlikely, but try changing the port number. Btw, this is OT thus please create a new thread to continue troubleshooting.Confirmed, WireGuard is blocked by ISP.
Where/how do you set this?@glet On each CAP you need to set slaves-static: yes. If you do this each slave interfaces will be permanent and not dynamic so you can configure them. This is what support told me and I did so and it works. It is good? No I would not say so but this means slave interfaces does work and can survive a restart.
As mentioned in podcast, kernel version change is triggering ROS version update. So kernel v6 (v7?) will be ROS v8.Hi all. An interesting thought came to mind. When switching to RouterOS 7, the kernel was updated. Will it be updated in the future as part of version 7 or will the next kernel update occur only in RouterOS 8?
There's a podcast? Where can I get it?As mentioned in podcast
All major podcast platforms and RSS:There's a podcast? Where can I get it?As mentioned in podcast
No, you don't have to use the new driver. You can stay on the legacy "wireless" driver and keep using old capsman with old features (and old performance).Could someone confirm:
- If using Hap AC3 with 7.13 have to use wifi-qcom-ac
You don't need to do it manually, you can provision the local radios with the same provisioning rules that new capsman is using.So if you run CapsMAN on a hAP AC3 the wireless interfaces on that box needs to be configured manually.
Any plans to release the official version before the holidays?What's new in 7.13rc4 (2023-Dec-12 15:16):
*) certificate - fixed CRL updating;
*) console - improved stability when removing script (introduced in v7.13beta3);
*) defconf - fixed configuration for Audience with "wifi-qcom-ac" package;
*) defconf - improved wifi interface detection after upgrade;
*) ethernet - improved system stability for L009 and hAP ax lite devices;
*) sfp - improved link establishment for SFP copper modules;
You can use provisioning rules on local radios by running the '/interface/wifi/radio/provision' command.Also note that you cannot run CapsMAN and connect CAP on the same box now. So if you run CapsMAN on a hAP AC3 the wireless interfaces on that box needs to be configured manually.
That is local.That's new ? It has always been stated earlier that for wifiwave2 capsman, local radios needed to be configured locally.
Log a ticket with support@mikrotik.comVPLS seems to be broken on 7.13rc.
Interface goes up but router reboot after some minutes (rb4011) or some hours (2216).
With the same config no issue on 7.12...
ThanksNo, you don't have to use the new driver. You can stay on the legacy "wireless" driver and keep using old capsman with old features (and old performance).
So if you run CapsMAN on a hAP AC3 the wireless interfaces on that box needs to be configured manually.
Yes, but VLAN's should be setup manually on each AC3 cap if using new AC driver That's the problem of manual work on each cap and there is really a huge quantity of AC3 at this client's locations where roaming and wave2 would be of great use.You don't need to do it manually, you can provision the local radios with the same provisioning rules that new capsman is using.
Because you cannot do that. 7.12 with wave2 driver on AC devices has the same VLAN limitations as 7.13 with wifi-qcom-ac driver. Nothing has changed in this regard.why would I use old wireless if I can use 7.12 with regular wave2 driver which allows benefits of wave2 and connect it to new capsman (CHR VM) and also all provisioning rules with SSID and VLANS's should still work without the need of manual setting up of VLAN's' per SSID
I can confirm that installation of v7.13rc4 has fixed the SFP negotiation issue that I was experiencing with rc3 :-)Just a heads up that upgrading to v7.13rc3 killed my PPPoE WAN connection - I've not had time to diagnose, but a rollback to rc2 has fixed the issue for me, so I'm confident that the rc3 upgrade was the cause. I am running an RB5009 with WAN connection via 1GbE copper SFP module - Manufacturer: FS model: SFP-GB-GE-T. I cannot see anything in the logs other than the PPPoE repeatedly trying and failing to connect, and cannot find any logging related to the SFP module. Looking at the release notes for rc3, I'm guessing that "*) sfp - improved link establishment for SFP copper modules;" has had unintended consequences! Here is my PPPoE config:
The entry from changelog you quoted and highlited doesn't mention data forwarding at all (neither local nor capsman). Instead it says you don't have to explicitly configure datapath for virtual interfaces if datapath for master fits the bill.Care to elaborate?no.
Thanks. That makes sense. Too Bad.The entry from changelog you quoted and highlited doesn't mention data forwarding at all (neither local nor capsman). Instead it says you don't have to explicitly configure datapath for virtual interfaces if datapath for master fits the bill.
Care to elaborate?
Not only possible, but already done. The very early releases of RoS 7 used a different kernel. Don't remember the version, but I do remember the upgrade. It didn't change the major number (if I'm not mistaken it went from kernel 5.X to 5.Y).AFAIK a key element in ROSv7 is/was the ability to update kernels.
They said in ROSv6 this is not possible due to endless constraints but in ROSv7 it should be possible.
How can I see the kernel version ros?Not only possible, but already done. The very early releases of RoS 7 used a different kernel. Don't remember the version, but I do remember the upgrade. It didn't change the major number (if I'm not mistaken it went from kernel 5.X to 5.Y).AFAIK a key element in ROSv7 is/was the ability to update kernels.
They said in ROSv6 this is not possible due to endless constraints but in ROSv7 it should be possible.
Something about long term version and such.
system/resource/usb print
How can I see the kernel version ros?
The very early releases of RoS 7 used a different kernel. Don't remember the version, but I do remember the upgrade. It didn't change the major number (if I'm not mistaken it went from kernel 5.X to 5.Y).