So, I have 3 RouterBoards... rb333, rb532a, rb133.
I intstalled ROS 3.3 on rb333... My clients Complained that after about 3+ minutes of login, They cant browse anymore. I went to one of my clients to check to see if that is true. Because I have setup everything inside my test room and tested it for one day and everything is fine before installing it to him. When I tested the PPPoE connection in his computer, I browsed for some 3 minutes. Then... Page Cannot be displayed anymore in IE or Firefox. So, I opened a cmd window and pinged continously the DNS Server. Then, I disconnected then reconnected again via pppoe... after three minutes of browsing ... Page cannot be Displayed again... The continous ping also stopped... Timed out... This Client is only about 50 meters from the AP.
I then Setup the rb532a routeros v3.3with the same setup as the rb333 ( I was thinking that because maybe the rb333 is still in a production stage when I bought it??? That is why it konked out!? I am one of the first rb333 buyers of wisp-router.com ). And still all clients, except the ones inside the test room experiences the 3 minute black out...
I then replaced the rb532a with the rb133 with the RouterOS 2.9.50, Everything went fine... This rb133 was the first I setup for PPPoE as a test unit. But because the rb532a and the rb333 is much much faster than the rb133, I opted to use the rb333 or the rb532a (that is why I bought it).
So I now downgraded the rb532a to ROS 2.9.50 and set it up again as before... Then replaced the rb133 with the rb532a and now everthing is working ok...
Now my Question:
you have some kind of packet loss. by turning off encryption it increased the performance
Normis, why can the rb133 handle the load with encryption using ROS 2.9.50, Against the rb532 ROS v3.3 can't handle the encryption? I have also tried to upgrade the rb133 to v3.3 during the morning hours... so most is offline. My mate called me to say that he is disconnected again after three minutes. But I can see him logged in on the rb133 with ROS 3.3
Please Normis, tell us if this is a bug and will be fixed...
If this is due to what you say like Performance issue and we need to encrypt those pppoe connection... I think I don't know what will I do with my rb333
(joke).
Or do we need a performance of something like a multicore Processor to handle the PPPoE encryption of ROSv3?
Thanks,
ColdHaze
PS.
I also tried ROS v3.0-3.3