1. Yes1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
5) After reading the other posts, if you are surprised to learn something, comment again with what you just learned
Ok, this is something close to mind that I rly wasn't using (maybe due to autosave on close). It does make much more sense to save them not based on ip. My point for "local ip name" is not relevant in this case.Sessions (Layouts) are not bound to the router. You can load some layout on any router, so you should probably name them by Function. not by IP
* a. If I didn't know, I'd expect it to be same a "New Winbox".1) Very infrequently, or sometime indirectly (e.g. what session was last set)
2) Save window layout, I thought...
3) Not sure – it's confusing already*. But perhaps showing them in a tab with some metadata on them on the winbox login (vs. the session dropdown with just file)
4) No – IMO it's a "layout" **
5) TL;DR
Then save it with a specific name, and use it as "default" instead of using "<own>"... No?3) i'd always wanted to take an existing layout and make it the default for new sessions, every single new device i acess i have to fix window sizes and sometimes fix shown options from context menus.
Winbox is not to my knowledge a Microsoft product.Mikrotik never made Winbox cross-platform and I prefer not to use Microsoft products.
You can already, when you save a profile it's available for selection for other/new connections...[CUT].. Maybe it would be a good idea to be able to save "connectionless" session with some preferred windows layout not bound to specific IP or MAC...[CUT]..
1) Yes, one session configured for one device, and another for newly acquisitioned device1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
5) After reading the other posts, if you are surprised to learn something, comment again with what you just learned
1) use implicitly, due to "autosave on close".1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
5) After reading the other posts, if you are surprised to learn something, comment again with what you just learned
Personally, every router I log into, my first actions are turning on every Dashboard setting, enabling In-Line Comments and turning off Hide Passwords in the Settings menu.. After that, opening the Log window and moving it to where usually put it. Finally to actually work, opening IP-Firewall and Interfaces because regardless of what I am doing, there is a good chance I need them.I log onto so any different routers for so many different reasons I cant actually conceive of a reason why I would want this feature. BUT to echo what some others have said, if they are using it and find it useful then maybe the issue is just that I have not tried it and I don't know what I am missing out on yet because I have not tried !!
1) Nop, never saw them until I click Advanced Mode (which I never do)1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
5) After reading the other posts, if you are surprised to learn something, comment again with what you just learned
They test it with wine, it works very well, except one version in the past, and that was quickly corrected.No builds for MAC and LInux. That will be nice addition.
LOL. Seem you figured it has more to with layouts/styling5) After reading a bit through the posts, it turns out sessions are something completely different than what I had in mind...so nevermind!
viewtopic.php?t=200431&hilit=winbox#p1050586Please rewrite winbox in Java, so that non-Windows users can finally remove 2GB of wine...
.Please rewrite winbox in Java, so that non-Windows users can finally remove 2GB of wine...
- WebFig is built-in and sufficiently useful
- Winbox is not built-in and superfluous
As before, my opinion is that the MAC-level access to MikroTik routers should be split off in a helper application, togetherSo we can agree that the only essential difference between Winbox and WebFig is the ability of former to connect device even if IP setup is not correct (and matching between ROS device and management workstation). And that difference would like go away if Winbox was rewritten to java. Hence idea about rewriting winbox to java is a stupid idea.
This thinking is just wrong. If you are admin in company (which is bigger than small), you typically administrating dozens ( in my case hundreds ) of devices and it cannot be done via web config effectively. No chance at all. And if you don't have that need, that's ok. The same way is ok just, .....you known.... having this need of native winbox mgmt tool, which is basically essential to you.
So we can agree that the only essential difference between Winbox and WebFig is the ability of former to connect device even if IP setup is not correct (and matching between ROS device and management workstation). And that difference would like go away if Winbox was rewritten to java. Hence idea about rewriting winbox to java is a stupid idea.
For all those professionals whose lives depend on winbox and are striving to get native app for <insert your favourite non-MS OS here>: if this is your tool for basic earnings, then suck it and use OS that supports it. I don't see many plumbers bitching about how jack lift should aide fitting sewage pipes.
Get off your high horse, with your anecdotal "minority" statistics that came our of your rear. What are you, five?There is minority of people like network admins, which using so stupid and useless OS like windows. This is OS for morons, gamers and children. That's all. Not for real work of sysadmin. Nmap, ping, wireshark,lynis, ssh, wget, fluxion and etc (essential tools for network admin) are not native windows app.
And because most of network administrators using Mac or (mainly IMHO) linux, it is quite essential to have winbox for these platforms without any unnecessary ballast (wine).
Not with winbox either. So that is a little irrelevant in this topic.This thinking is just wrong. If you are admin in company (which is bigger than small), you typically administrating dozens ( in my case hundreds ) of devices and it cannot be done via web config effectively. No chance at all.
"He that has a great nose, thinks everybody is speaking of it. !Get off your high horse, with your anecdotal "minority" statistics that came our of your rear. What are you, five?
... Just childish.
thanks for share good informetion.
- Yes, only recently and I don't think (oh.. the second question is exactly about that )
- I don't know what were they made for originally, but for myself I've stumbled upon three use cases (thus session file "type"):
- window manager based on specific tasks that currently are being fiddled with e.g. /routing/rules + /ip/routes + /routing/table + /ip/firewall/mangle
- window manager based on available display size (so mostly which columns and how wide)
- window manager based on device type/role (router/switch/accesspoint...)
- introduce a game "show my your windows and I'll tell you your task" add "task views" with separate setting for "info granularity => columns" and "positions on screen"
- I don't know what it's meant to do but will check back after 5. For how it works for me: Task View, Arrangements, TaskMAN
EDIT: surprised that I was not surprised
1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
5) After reading the other posts, if you are surprised to learn something, comment again with what you just learned
Just realized The Dude uses the term "panels", which is not a bad term – better than session at least.4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?
"That rug really tied the room together."
—Jeffrey "The Dude" Lebowsk
I am praying that New Winbox uses a native toolkit like QT rather than something dirty like Electron.
I'm only praying for native Linux support (instead of having to use Wine). Maybe something based on Flutter/Dart so Mikrotik can pool their dev resources instead of having 3 different dev teams for the web-ui, winbox and android app.
New owner of a Hex S:
1: I run a linux desktop, so a Windows application doesn't work for me. I like others find it of no use to my administration tasks.
1) Have you ever used Sessions? (default ones are <own> and <none> and you can make more)
2) Describe in a few words, what you think they do
3) How could we supercharge this feature to actually be useful for everyone?
4) Does the name Sessions actually convey what this feature is meant to do?