Hi all,
We are ISP Company .. at the latest time we used mikrotik 4.4 in our topology.
But we face some problems !!
The most important for this problems is we need all our customers have real ip not virtual and we need to loadbalance our tow bandwidth and finally we need to get the cache and hotspot working and note ( we need our customers to have real IP) detected by rapishare,4shared ..
Here is our topology as shown
Hope all give us an aid to resolve this issues.
Mikrotik For ISP
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
No one knows what we are doing here ??
is it not supported here in mikrotik
is it not supported here in mikrotik
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
I suggest you to find an Mikrotik Consultant...No one knows what we are doing here ??
is it not supported here in mikrotik
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
1) For the load-balancing you can use different approaches,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Routing
You can try PCC option.
2) Just add IP addresses to the local interface and do not use NAT rules.
3) Give us more information about PPP/Virtual cache.
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Routing
You can try PCC option.
2) Just add IP addresses to the local interface and do not use NAT rules.
3) Give us more information about PPP/Virtual cache.
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
esmolz,
can you tell me what equipment you use at your network and how many clients you have with that equipments?
thank you
can you tell me what equipment you use at your network and how many clients you have with that equipments?
thank you
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
In PCC Routing it says that:1) For the load-balancing you can use different approaches,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Routing
You can try PCC option.
2) Just add IP addresses to the local interface and do not use NAT rules.
3) Give us more information about PPP/Virtual cache.
Code: Select all
/ ip address
add address=192.168.0.1/24 network=192.168.0.0 broadcast=192.168.0.255 interface=Local
add address=10.111.0.2/24 network=10.111.0.0 broadcast=10.111.0.255 interface=wlan1
add address=10.112.0.2/24 network=10.112.0.0 broadcast=10.112.0.255 interface=wlan2
/ ip firewall mangle
add chain=input in-interface=wlan1 action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan1_conn
add chain=input in-interface=wlan2 action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan2_conn
add chain=output connection-mark=wlan1_conn action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan1
add chain=output connection-mark=wlan2_conn action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan2
add chain=prerouting dst-address=10.111.0.0/24 action=accept in-interface=Local
add chain=prerouting dst-address=10.112.0.0/24 action=accept in-interface=Local
add chain=prerouting dst-address-type=!local in-interface=Local per-connection-classifier=both-addresses:2/0 \
action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan1_conn passthrough=yes
add chain=prerouting dst-address-type=!local in-interface=Local per-connection-classifier=both-addresses:2/1 \
action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan2_conn passthrough=yes
add chain=prerouting connection-mark=wlan1_conn in-interface=Local action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan1
add chain=prerouting connection-mark=wlan2_conn in-interface=Local action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan2
/ ip route
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.111.0.1 routing-mark=to_wlan1 check-gateway=ping
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.112.0.1 routing-mark=to_wlan2 check-gateway=ping
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.111.0.1 distance=1 check-gateway=ping
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=10.112.0.1 distance=2 check-gateway=ping
/ ip firewall nat
add chain=srcnat out-interface=wlan1 action=masquerade
add chain=srcnat out-interface=wlan2 action=masquerade
Code: Select all
/ ip firewall nat
add chain=srcnat out-interface=wlan1 action=masquerade
add chain=srcnat out-interface=wlan2 action=masquerade
So this can't be use in our company.
for simple introduction we are Internet Service Providers
ALL of our recent topology is Cisco
we need to develope our topology with mikrotik and caching to improve our service
we are using now ( every Cisco 7200 for bandwidth and ip routing about 5 different REAL IP ranges)
Cisco 7200 --- Go to ---> Dslams --Go to--> ADSL Modems
and another
Cisco 7200 --- Go to ---> Dslams --Go to--> ADSL Modems
WE NEED TO IMPROVE IT TO BE
Cisco 7200 -->
MIKROTIK LoadBalancing/PPP --> Caching Server --> Dslams --> ADSL Modems
Cisco 7200 -->
OR TO BE
Cisco 7200 -->
MIKROTIK LoadBalancing/PPP -->
SWITCH <-- Dslams --> ADSL Modems
Caching Server -->
Cisco 7200 -->
This Adsl Modems (every customer) must has his real/public ip to use it over internet for rapidshare, 4shared ....
HOPE I explained the topology well else HOPE To Find Good Configuration For this
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
if you want to use real ips - don't use src-nat, what's problem? =)
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
The problem that internet don't come out from the serverif you want to use real ips - don't use src-nat, what's problem? =)
please help in route my real ip and get it out without problems
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
how do your ISP supply real IPs to you? is it bridging or routing?
also, what's your way to distribute internet access? is it direct routing (with modems NATting), or some VPN through the modems?
also, what's your way to distribute internet access? is it direct routing (with modems NATting), or some VPN through the modems?
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
how do your ISP supply real IPs to you? is it bridging or routing?
also, what's your way to distribute internet access? is it direct routing (with modems NATting), or some VPN through the modems?
it is routed ip ... via cisco 7200
and the customers use adsl modems to connect via mikrotik PPPoe
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
routed? it's brilliant. so all you should do is just assign to the users IPs from different public subnets, so that uplinks load increased equally. you don't need 'realtime balancing' - it's just impossible if clients have fixed IPs. and you cannot use RouterOS web proxy - it changes request address to router's address. you should use Squid for absolutely transparent caching
so simply setup ospf or something so that your dslams know current online users' addresses
so simply setup ospf or something so that your dslams know current online users' addresses
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
routed? it's brilliant. so all you should do is just assign to the users IPs from different public subnets, so that uplinks load increased equally. you don't need 'realtime balancing' - it's just impossible if clients have fixed IPs. and you cannot use RouterOS web proxy - it changes request address to router's address. you should use Squid for absolutely transparent caching
so simply setup ospf or something so that your dslams know current online users' addresses
can you give me a tutorial for squid caching and how to make this !!
i know this is not related with mikrotik but hope you give me aid .
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
maybe look at that thread: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 91#p190991
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
Thank you For your good reply and support
in my topology i used PER TRAFFIC LOAD BALANCE
and now i'm planning to use SQUID TPROXY without nating
but i've a small question
if i used tproxy is this will effect and the cache will work in the real ip customers or it will ignore the real ip and will work only in the virtual ips??
in my topology i used PER TRAFFIC LOAD BALANCE
and now i'm planning to use SQUID TPROXY without nating
but i've a small question
if i used tproxy is this will effect and the cache will work in the real ip customers or it will ignore the real ip and will work only in the virtual ips??
Re: Mikrotik For ISP
squid in tproxy mode should not change IP addresses at all. absolutely transparent proxying and caching