http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Mana ... ile_UploadThis is a bit of a learning curve. Not nearly as simple as the old one.
How do we add custom logos?
How does Settings - style - logo: work? Where do you put the file?
What file types and sizes are supported?
Added support for all the time zones listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_time_zonesindian timezone still not exist
head post updated with v4.1 linksWhat about test version for ROS 4.1?
yes it would be really gr8 if we can know What's new, fixed & changes in 4.1 userman. so, we can try & feed back about it.What's new in 4.1 test version?
you can set pool in profiles.Where in Menü can I find pool name, in 3.30 it is under user..
nice! future will be bright!We have to add Paypal payments, that's the major feature that's missing right now. Once all functionality from previous User Manager will be properly implemented, then new features will be added.
because i cannot find test-userman for 4.2Why not?
upgraded but don't see any changes or fixes?First post
/system logging add topics=radius
this problem still exist in 4.3TUMthis problem still exist in 4.2
in session & A session
when mac binding will be implemented it is very important users keep sharing their accounts
Doneyou can email support @mikrotik.com
i realy don't know why that feature isn't implemented in this version. realy wierd.can user change her password like usermanager ver 3.27?
because i see in usermanager ver4 user cannot changer her password
thanks
So I posted to this forum and searched - nothing.1) limit per day. one user can download 200MB per day, not more.... 200Mb another day etc.
SO according to that there is a feature list somewhere on the forums. I know of the changelog - that is not a feature list.Hello,
I suggest to read this forum section were you will find the info on the new
userman test package and the features that it has. Currently the new userman
is still in development process, so not all the requested features are added.
Regards,
Uldis
Sure Let me check everything!Thank you very much asus too!
Please, report to us any problems, if you will notice.
Jan/23/2010 15:26:18 radius,debug,packet NAS-Identifier = "Rasdad"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:18 radius,debug,packet NAS-IP-Address = 203.xx.xxx.x
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet received Accounting-Response with id 244 from 203.xx.xxx.1:1813
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Signature = 0xd8cfe908e468ea3c6339754b4fdba2b5
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug received reply for 1b:00
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug request 1b:00 processed
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet received Access-Reject with id 245 from 203.xx.1xx.1:1812
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Signature = 0x21f4a35c91c8cfd2ebe1f1c3483f5757
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Reply-Message = "simultaneous session limit reached"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug received reply for 1b:2221
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug new request 1b:00 code=Accounting-Request service=ppp called-id=ppp
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug sending 1b:00 to 203.xx.xxx.1:1813
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet sending Accounting-Request with id 246 to 203.76.191.1:1813
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Signature = 0x9288577da0e308805d569269dd94a04f
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Service-Type = 2
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Framed-Protocol = 1
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet NAS-Port = 6867
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet NAS-Port-Type = 15
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet User-Name = "xxxxx"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Calling-Station-Id = "00:xx:7x:xx:xx:1F"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Called-Station-Id = "ppp"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet NAS-Port-Id = "ether2-local"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Session-Id = "81701947"
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Framed-IP-Address = 203.xx.xxx.2xx
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Authentic = 1
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Event-Timestamp = 1264240579
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Session-Time = 721
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Input-Octets = 1454977
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Input-Gigawords = 0
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Input-Packets = 34654
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Output-Octets = 99945019
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Output-Gigawords = 0
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Output-Packets = 68078
Jan/23/2010 15:26:19 radius,debug,packet Acct-Status-Type = 3
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet NAS-Identifier = "RajanNet"
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug received Access-Request 16641 from 127.0.0.1:42988
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug sendOldSessDiscReq(160)
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug sending Access-Reject 16641
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet sending Access-Reject with id 58 to 127.0.0.1:42988
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet Signature = 0x0cc3c61723584087a81636391b8e819e
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet Reply-Message = "simultaneous session limit reached"
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug Request processed in 56 ms
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet received Accounting-Request with id 56 from 127.0.0.1:45171
Jan/25/2010 11:50:09 manager,debug,packet Signature = 0x93f54a62ffff5d6317ba3603e5d180d7
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet CHAP-Challenge = 0xcbd41df75529c97d78c8a22d88e7a7e6
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet CHAP-Password = 0x017954943297ea2d7629ffa465a6af09
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet 75
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet NAS-Identifier = "RXXXX"
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug received Access-Request 5646 from 2010 12:36:20 manager,debug sendOldSessDiscReq(1364)
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,error,info,debug failed to find oldest active session for user: database disk image is malformed
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug sending Access-Reject 5646
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet sending Access-Reject with id 184 to 127.0.0.1:60171127.0.0.1:60171
Jan/26/
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet Signature = 0xc2aa5e52bf9fac9f6befd8387cd0045f
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet Reply-Message = "simultaneous session limit reached"
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug Request processed in 30 ms
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet received Accounting-Request with id 185 from 127.0.0.1:39702
Jan/26/2010 12:36:20 manager,debug,packet Signature = 0x367a191598c68eb73272da081c6bdfea
If you are happy to install a beta test package which is still being developed and might break your network. Sure!! But if it stops your clients from connecting and they are all screaming at you, maybe best not to use any BETA version of Usermanager and stick to v3.30 which is still supported?Hi
Is 4.6 ok to use on client enviroment? PPP and Hotspot?
If I upgrade to 4.6, will it keep all my settings? Thanks
it can be done with 4.6 UM change both subscriber & their customer logoHi staff,
Is it possible to edit the login page of the user manager test version? I mean....the logo and the text is done but that is changed once the user logs in....but the login page still has the Mikrotik logo...can that be done?
thanks for your updates...those are really helpful
I get the same. User created on signup page, get redirected to PayPal, user pays OK, I receive email from PayPal with payment notification, user gets email from PayPal that money has been sent, user gets redirected back to hotspot logon page with error stating "user <xyz> not found" (where xyz is username)I have a problem with Paypal and userman test 4.6
Users using signup and paying via paypal don't seem to work.
Signup works, paypal works, but the users created in this way can't loginto hotspot.
Owner: admin
Username: xyz
Start time: 03/27/2010 21:24:05
End time: Waiting
Status: Started
Price: 10.00
Currency: GBP
Result:
Type: PayPal
Statistics
Upload Used: 0 B
Download Used: 0 B
Uptime Used: 0s
Last used IP: 0.0.0.0
Last used MAC:
Till time: Not set
Total time left: 0s
Bill
Money paid: 0.00
Money used: 0.00
Money left: 0.00
Please check your server that handles PayPal Instant Payment Notifications (IPN). Instant Payment Notifications sent to the following URL(s) are failing:
http://{IP}/user?serviceId=MWT.Payment&method=2
If you do not recognize this URL, you may be using a service provider that is using IPN on your behalf. Please contact your service provider with the above information. If this problem continues, IPNs may be disabled for your account.
What 4.7 changelog? It is still only 4.6?no change logs for 4.7?
Any progress with this yet?It would be great to receive Paypal debug information from anyone who has problems,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Mana ... l_payments
We will see where is the problem with Paypal payments and fix the problem, if it exists.
I've raised a support ticket. Now waiting.Any progress with this yet?
Can you recreate it in the LAB?
The same, I performed some further tests, no progress yet...I've raised a support ticket. Now waiting.Any progress with this yet?
Can you recreate it in the LAB?
Because UserManager 4.6 TEST is not the same as UserManager 4.6 stable. From what I have been led to believe it shares very little underlying original source code to the current stable and working version. It is a whole NEW version. A complete rewrite. So it is not possible to "backport" all the nice new features into the current 'normal' 4.6 Stable version. Remember it is also BETA, which means if something does not work, do not be surprised or angry if you find that something fails when testing with real live customers.Hi, why is it that most of the features being tested in the UM test packages are not always included in the stable version of it?
As far as I know, UM is not yet available for "5 Beta 1"I think it is accepted that userman test-package 4.6 has a problem with paypal payments (see items above).
Has this issue been resolved in 5 beta 1 ? or is userman in that package same as test pkg 4.6 ?
Then what is the essence of testing, I believe that after testing and it is ok, it should be transformed into the stable version and made available. The features tested in 4.6 BETA was not included in the 4.6 stable and now 5.0 TEST (BETA) is been tested, which means the features available for testing in the 5.0 BETA will not be included in the 5.0 Stable when released.Because UserManager 4.6 TEST is not the same as UserManager 4.6 stable. From what I have been led to believe it shares very little underlying original source code to the current stable and working version. It is a whole NEW version. A complete rewrite. So it is not possible to "backport" all the nice new features into the current 'normal' 4.6 Stable version. Remember it is also BETA, which means if something does not work, do not be surprised or angry if you find that something fails when testing with real live customers.Hi, why is it that most of the features being tested in the UM test packages are not always included in the stable version of it?
As far as I know, UM is not yet available for "5 Beta 1"I think it is accepted that userman test-package 4.6 has a problem with paypal payments (see items above).
Has this issue been resolved in 5 beta 1 ? or is userman in that package same as test pkg 4.6 ?
Sergejs. I did this. I sent a support email over two weeks ago, with supout as per your request. I received an immediate automated ticket email (2010033166000071). Since then absolutely nothing. I sent a polite email requesting if there was an update a week ago. Still nothing. Not even the courtesy of a reply that you had got my email and you were dealing with it, or needed more info, or whatever. Nothing! It is not the way to treat your customers by stonewalling them with silence!It would be great to receive Paypal debug information from anyone who has problems,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Mana ... l_payments
We will see where is the problem with Paypal payments and fix the problem, if it exists.
We to are waiting on this issue. We have been spending some time developing as skin and new applications around the new userman test-package/5.0beta1. We can't proceed to production testing without paypal...Paypal is integral to the package, so we cannot easly work around the issue.Sergejs. I did this. I sent a support email over two weeks ago, with supout as per your request. I received an immediate automated ticket email (2010033166000071). Since then absolutely nothing. I sent a polite email requesting if there was an update a week ago. Still nothing. Not even the courtesy of a reply that you had got my email and you were dealing with it, or needed more info, or whatever. Nothing! It is not the way to treat your customers by stonewalling them with silence!It would be great to receive Paypal debug information from anyone who has problems,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Mana ... l_payments
We will see where is the problem with Paypal payments and fix the problem, if it exists.
Ron
I think I must have upset someone at MT Support. I still have no answer to the 2 emails I sent to them.We know its a test package, but its not good that we have to wait so long without any progress, feed back or timescale.
We're now up to 3 unanswered emails and another week rolls by of being ignored. I even sent my last email to someone else in MT to chase this up. Nothing. No reply. Not even from this other guy, who I know is there, as he sent me an email only just before I sent mine.I think I must have upset someone at MT Support. I still have no answer to the 2 emails I sent to them.We know its a test package, but its not good that we have to wait so long without any progress, feed back or timescale.
I'm sure it has been, but a clue as to which version it has been fixed in would be a good idea!?The problem is fixed for the User Manager and payment, it will be available in the MikroTik RouterOS version.
Hello Normisv4.9 test added to head topic
I have created rate limits under Profiles- Limitations.Use Profiles to configure Rate-Limit for the users.
The problem is that all profiles are visible on the signup paypal payment page.There should be separate profile for the specific customer then.
What is static queue and how do i add it?You can add static queue to set different limit for client.
You can manually assign profile for the client.
00:00:09 system,info verified userman-test-4.10-mipsbe.npk
00:00:10 system,info installed userman-test-4.10
00:00:10 system,info router rebooted
00:00:15 manager,debug Migrating old credits to new profiles
00:00:15 manager,debug Running backup before migration
00:00:15 manager,debug creating missing payments
00:00:16 manager,debug checking profile boundaries
00:00:16 manager,error,info,debug error:
00:00:16 manager,debug updating profile time fields for users...
00:00:16 manager,debug updating user money fields
00:00:10 system,info router rebooted
00:00:12 manager,debug creating missing payments
00:00:12 manager,debug checking profile boundaries
00:00:12 manager,error,info,debug error:
00:00:12 manager,debug updating profile time fields for users...
00:00:12 manager,debug updating user money fields
Normis,v4.9 test added to head topic
Thanks. I'd rather wait for the final release before upgrading anyway. If the UM hasn't changed then there's no immediate need.currently they are the same
Existing problems in User Manager or just RouterOS for the v5 release? Perhaps some of my feature requests are already supported somehow.We had a change of staff, so User Manager development has slowed down. We are currently mostly working on fixing existing problems.
Is version 5 and 4 of UM the same? Are there in version 5 the same bugs?anybody alive der where is 4.12 UM & still there is lot of bugs in UM. plz let us know if there is any fix in it
Yeah, I'd like to know too. The reporting side of things has a lot of bugs.Is version 5 and 4 of UM the same? Are there in version 5 the same bugs?anybody alive der where is 4.12 UM & still there is lot of bugs in UM. plz let us know if there is any fix in it
sorry, v4.13 addedwhere is 4.13 UM u guys r so unprofessional always run away from ur responsibility.
Thanks for the update. Any updates to the change log?sorry, v4.13 added
use v5 to get the latest packages included in each upgrade
+1Would it make more sense to move UM to a subscription paid model? Its a decent bit of software users are asking for to be fixed and it's a hard business case to sink dev time into something you give away for free.
I'm sure users that use it would pay for it if it meant some more time could be spent on it
UM has potential. I'd pay license for the package if it were supported.+1Would it make more sense to move UM to a subscription paid model? Its a decent bit of software users are asking for to be fixed and it's a hard business case to sink dev time into something you give away for free.
I'm sure users that use it would pay for it if it meant some more time could be spent on it
you need to configure everything first. until configuration is complete, user page will redirect. not a bug.Reporting ....
x86 v5RC_12 internal release of 16th March + user manager of 16th -> http://router/user points to same as http://router/userman
Isn't the /user/ one supposed to be for the users? So they would be able to see their uptime and usage?
Thank you.
Anybody have any ideas on how to change this 'no profile found' message when the users credit has expired when the hostpot is connected to UM.?
I've checked the errors.txt file on the hotspot itself, but can't see any reference to it.
Thanks,
Barry.
# no profile found
# Erroneous error, it really means that the client's credit has expired
no-profile-found = Your credit has expired. Please add more credit to your account before attempting again.
Thanks now UM works fine i will report bugs if i found ny , I have a lil request
which tables are not updated? do you use a recent web browser like FF4 or Chrome?Thanks now UM works fine i will report bugs if i found ny , I have a lil request
Which version do you use? Is it stable?
In v.5.0 I miss that I can't do all things in webinterface, like profiles. And you often have to logout in webinterface because tables are not updated when you change something.
I use Firefox 4. Win7.which tables are not updated? do you use a recent web browser like FF4 or Chrome?
Same at me.Just the updates to the screen when working on the web site are buggy, can you add a "refresh button" please, so after you have changed the profile of a user on the user page, the page updates. Currently I have to re-sort the list to get the new profile displayed.
Same at me. After relogin names are ok.Also, when adding / changing profiles in the profile section , the refreshing also isnt great, if I scroll between the profiles, sometimes the name I assigned , gets assigned to all the profiles,
Same at me. After relogin names are ok.and even worse, sometimes the actual profile name, if I add a new profile, then choose an old profile in the drop down list, gets given the same name as the new profile, so the names all get messed up - very weird behavior.
Yes that really sucks. One main reason I can't use it!Otherwise, the upgrade from v4 to v5 worked easily enough, except I had 100 users, so I had to manually assign the profile to each user since you cant do it via cli and there is no way in the gui to select many users, and set their profile at same time, you can choose a lot of users, and remove but not make a global profile change.
I use Win7/ FF4. There is no script error at me.O ya, just remembered, when I select a bunch of users, then choose disable - I get some strange script error pop up window.
As far as I can tell, yes. There is also no access via CLI or API so you can't script or program to bulk-fix it.Do I have to create the profiles and add them manually to each user?
I tested it for two months before going live and didn't have a problem. Once it went live UM fell apart and I had all the problems the guy is having above.Which version do you use? Latest is the one that comes with RouterOS v5.4. Could you try that one please?
And please next time when you deploy something - test first in a development/testing environment.
If you don't understand this - pay a "contractor" to test and deploy it for you.
it's possible but with 802.11N it works betterCan I use 4.6 or newer userman with 4.5 mikrotik? I found that 4.5 version is most stable with 802.11N, and I won't change it...