Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
mohsen1981
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:09 pm

how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:15 pm

hi mates
I have these:

one RB433
3 mikrotik wireless cards
3 sector 120 antenna

I want to make something like an omni 360 antenna:
same SSID on all wireless cards
same frequency on all cards
and no frequency conflict
with roaming capability

whatever setup I test results in something like a loop and there will be no access to MT unless I remove wireless cards!!!

any help would be appreciated
Last edited by mohsen1981 on Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
pcglobelb
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:10 pm

Re: how to setup this scenario

Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:10 am

you can never setup a similar scenario... each mini pci must have a unique ssid
 
shrek777
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:44 am

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:13 pm

I have the same configuration, but its better to use different frequencies, you can use same ssid.

but if you will use same ssid and same frequency you will need to add rule in wireless->access list,

for example in mac address type one ofthe cards mac address and uncheck checkbox authenticate and forwared, after that cards willnot connect to each other, you will need to do this for all cards
 
User avatar
Hotz1
Member
Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:55 am

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:53 pm

one RB433
3 mikrotik wireless cards
3 sector 120 antenna

I want to make something like an omni 360 antenna:
same SSID on all wireless cards
same frequency on all cards
and no frequency conflict
with roaming capability

whatever setup I test results in something like a loop and there will be no access to MT unless I remove wireless cards!!!
I currently have several multi-radio APs set up as follows:
  • 1. Define a bridge
    2. Configure all three radios to ap-bridge, same frequency, same SSID, dynamic WDS, with WDS-bridge set to the bridge you just defined
    3. Add all three radios as ports to the bridge
Now use this three-radio bridge as a single interface, as you would use any other: for DHCP server, hotspot server, etc..

Dan
 
User avatar
nickb
Member
Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 6:24 pm
Location: Southeast Kansas
Contact:

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:08 am

You will end up with CSMA problems if you use the same frequency on all sectors. Use non-overlapping channels for best results. In the USA that's 2412MHz, 2437Mhz, and 2462Mhz.

If you use the same SSID you can have clients choosing which antenna is the best e.g. "Roaming".

For best results when a client hops sectors, use the bridging configuration described above.
 
User avatar
Hotz1
Member
Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:55 am

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:11 am

You will end up with CSMA problems if you use the same frequency on all sectors. Use non-overlapping channels for best results. In the USA that's 2412MHz, 2437Mhz, and 2462Mhz.
If you use the same SSID you can have clients choosing which antenna is the best e.g. "Roaming".
For best results when a client hops sectors, use the bridging configuration described above.
If you use different channels, and don't use WDS, doesn't this mean the client has to drop association with the first radio card before it can associate with another? If so, the resulting experience for the user is temporary loss of connectivity (and probably dropped VoIP/streaming media) at each transition.

Which begs the question: is there another way to get radios to hand clients to each other seamlessly, without putting them on the same channel and using WDS?
 
User avatar
nickb
Member
Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 6:24 pm
Location: Southeast Kansas
Contact:

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:54 am

If you use different channels, and don't use WDS, doesn't this mean the client has to drop association with the first radio card before it can associate with another? If so, the resulting experience for the user is temporary loss of connectivity (and probably dropped VoIP/streaming media) at each transition.
It's my understanding that weather or not it's on the same channel doesn't matter, the behavior would be the same. It would disassociate from one, then associate to the other.

Regardless, why would you intentionally gimp your system? If you run all three sectors on the same channel, you'll have huge CSMA and CCQ issues, and major problems with collisions.
Which begs the question: is there another way to get radios to hand clients to each other seamlessly, without putting them on the same channel and using WDS?
To my understanding 802.11 does not support seamless roaming.


From Cisco Press:
The Nature of Roaming in 802.11

802.11 roaming is known as "break before make," referring to the requirement that a station serves its association with one AP before creating an association with a new one. This process might seem unintuitive because it introduces the possibility for data loss during roaming, but it facilitates a simpler MAC protocol and radio.

If 802.11 were "make before break," meaning a station could associate to a new AP before disassociating from the old AP, you would need safeguards in the MAC to ensure a loop-free topology. A station connected to the same Layer 2 broadcast domain via simultaneous network connections has the potential to trigger broadcast storms. A "make before break" architecture would necessitate an algorithm such as 802.1D spanning tree to resolve any potential loops, adding overhead to the MAC protocol. In addition, the client radio would have to be capable of listening and communicating on more than one channel at a time, increasing the complexity of the radio (and adding to the overall cost of the devices).
 
gmidia
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:28 pm

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:32 pm

same ssid different frequencies and bridge them up
 
Netspeed
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:43 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:39 pm

I currently have several multi-radio APs set up as follows:
  • 1. Define a bridge
    2. Configure all three radios to ap-bridge, same frequency, same SSID, dynamic WDS, with WDS-bridge set to the bridge you just defined
    3. Add all three radios as ports to the bridge
Now use this three-radio bridge as a single interface, as you would use any other: for DHCP server, hotspot server, etc..

Dan
I'm pretty new to MikroTik gear but trying to learn fast on my self teach crash course.
I am trying to set up a second 120 deg AP on my system and have set up as Dan said (I'm using different SSID's and channels). When I add the radio port to the bridge it sets up as disabled port and the radio is in italics,
Whats going on there?
How can I overcome?
Thanks in advance (for someones assist).
 
Feklar
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1724
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:46 pm

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:14 am

If I remember correctly, the Mikrotik shows the wireless as being down when there is no one associated to the access point. If you associate to the wireless interface it should show it as enabled.
 
Netspeed
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:43 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: how to setup wireless 360 using 3 sector antenna

Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:34 am

If I remember correctly, the Mikrotik shows the wireless as being down when there is no one associated to the access point. If you associate to the wireless interface it should show it as enabled.
Yes thanks that solves it (after a 4 hour round trip to install a client device)
I was worried that the italicised device name may mean another problem but it looks like the italics dont seem to mean anything.

Thanks for assist

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: seriosha and 37 guests