Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
Rockyboa
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:52 pm

Queue tree vs simple

Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:24 pm

Ok I'm convinced, I need to setup queues for better traffic management. I read a lot of post and wiki and certainly would like to keep it up to a fairly simple environment.

I tought using priorization without queues at first but, I do understand that this is relatively not efficient. So I would like to hand out a 64Kbs max download and 16Kbs upload to all users that connect to my Citrix farm (tcp 2598) and prio this to 1.

Can I use simple queue? Or should I go straight to a tree?

Martin
 
chephalonia
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:18 am

Re: Queue tree vs simple

Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:31 am

I used simple queue, and it's work fine to me. Just do the easiest that worked.
 
Feklar
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1724
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:46 pm

Re: Queue tree vs simple

Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:34 pm

Simple queues would be the easiest to set up, but it will come down to the number of rules that are required. If your set up requires a ton of simple queues, then the tree would be the way to go. This is mainly because simple queues are processed in the order that they appear, so potentially a packet needs to be processed through all of these rules before they are hit and are applied and this can take up a lot of resources/time depending on the number of rules. A tree is a lot more efficient because the seek times are much much less to find a rule that they fit.
 
Rockyboa
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:52 pm

Re: Queue tree vs simple

Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:57 pm

Thanks guys,

I don't have a lot of rule so I think I will strart with simple queues. I guess when they grow in numbers, then, I will rethink all of this but for now I wont use more than 8 to 10 rules for now.
 
User avatar
mac86
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:52 am
Location: bahia blanca - argentina
Contact:

Re: Queue tree vs simple

Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:14 am

Simple queues would be the easiest to set up, but it will come down to the number of rules that are required. If your set up requires a ton of simple queues, then the tree would be the way to go. This is mainly because simple queues are processed in the order that they appear, so potentially a packet needs to be processed through all of these rules before they are hit and are applied and this can take up a lot of resources/time depending on the number of rules. A tree is a lot more efficient because the seek times are much much less to find a rule that they fit.

Thank you very much!

I've a router with 1900 simple queue, and his CPU comes down.
I will try with queue tree.

PD: sorry, i've tried to upgrade your karma but I think I've mistaked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests