Yeah, this detail really interests me too!...and how do the capacitors look?
It looks like 1524 on all ethernet prts.What is the maximum MTU (jumbo frames?) and how do the capacitors look?
No I have not used the SR71-A. But I do have a customer that is using them with the RB433AH and he is pretty happy with the performance.May I ask you Tom if you have any positive experience of using an SR71-A with RB493-xx boards? And btw does SR71A fits inside 493 indoor case?
Just how close to reality is this? .1v out? 1v out?accurate voltage and temperature monitoring (awesome!)
I only tested one board for voltage and it was within .1 volt of my fluke VOM. And I am not sure I can probe exactly where they are checking voltage. I didn't cross check the temperature setting against anything but I did see that it was working. I checked a cold board and then checked several times as it warmed up.Just how close to reality is this? .1v out? 1v out?accurate voltage and temperature monitoring (awesome!)
The RB/192 had the same separate switch groups. The RB493 replaced it and had a single switch chip. I am guessing that MT didn't want to wait for a 9 port Gigabit ethernet switch chip that is affordable.I would have loved it if it werent for separate switch groups.... WTF!
I cant speak for price, but I know they exist... Just not Atheros... 2 separate gigabit switch groups is about as worthless as a 2 pec......... Wonder if that CPU can keep up with bridging 120meg/second of data. Its really just throwing ports on there for the heck of it. The only real use it would be is if you needed to have 2 separate networks anyways. 493AH is still my choice at this point.The RB/192 had the same separate switch groups. The RB493 replaced it and had a single switch chip. I am guessing that MT didn't want to wait for a 9 port Gigabit ethernet switch chip that is affordable.
Speak for yourself.While I'm at it... and hot blonds don't go for geeky network guys.
Tom
I was wondering Tom if the two switch groups could be chained together. Not the best workaround but it might work for some.It's really too bad that these switch chips don't have a really high speed bus that allows you to gang them together.
Yes, of course you can can always bridge them together. That is always a work around but does take CPU cycles. So I would use bridging for my lower traffic links and use the main 4 or 5 for the highest traffic.I was wondering Tom if the two switch groups could be chained together. Not the best workaround but it might work for some.It's really too bad that these switch chips don't have a really high speed bus that allows you to gang them together.
I, too, don't actually consider this twin chip implementation as some serious limitation. I'd definitely use RB493G even if it was a single AR8316 - five port unit. Also, the freedom of having both bridged and switched ports is something really interesting.I don't want to put a negative spin on this product. I still plan to use this at my WPOPs.
The RB493G is relatively low cost and has the most Gigabit ethernet ports of any RouterBoard along with miniPCI slots for radios.
That's what I was considering actually. I don't see any reason why this might not be working.Would it be possible to use a patchcable (1m, 0,5 m) and put it in switchgroup one with one end, switchgroup two with second end? that way you would have at least 7 GBit ports left, with a "Backplane" of only 1 Gbit/s FD, but that could suffice for many things...
Sure, nice kludge but as you pointed out, you lose two ports. If you are using it only for a switch then yes, you have a 7 port gigabit switch. But if you need some wan or routed ports, then the benefit is quickly lost.Hi,
just a quick question, Tom.
Would it be possible to use a patchcable (1m, 0,5 m) and put it in switchgroup one with one end, switchgroup two with second end? that way you would have at least 7 GBit ports left, with a "Backplane" of only 1 Gbit/s FD, but that could suffice for many things...
Greetz
Schnulch
I believe we were one of the first distributors to get them and our stock came in a few weeks ago. Most Mikrotik distributors should have them by now.Any suggestions on where i can get a hold of this unit ? I've been holding out since it was announced but have no idea who is stocking them. I'm located in Aus so generally i have to order from overseas anyway....
Edit: Also does anyone have any info on power consumption of these units ?
Do you know where the temperature sensor is? I'm trying to figure out if this is reliable or not.accurate voltage and temperature monitoring (awesome!)
Nice to hear that! I too think it's the best place to measure the average board temperature.it is somewhere between on oe switch chips and CPU. That is why i can show temperature like that as it receives heat from Gbit switch, that usually are hot and a cpu.
What's a wPOP?
I had been using RB493AH boards at all of my wPOPs. I think I'll be switching to this new board. The temperature and voltage monitoring alone make it worthwhile.
Tom
wPOP = wireless POP aka wireless Point of Presence. Usually a tower or high building location with back haul radios and multiple access points (APs).What's a wPOP?
I had been using RB493AH boards at all of my wPOPs. I think I'll be switching to this new board. The temperature and voltage monitoring alone make it worthwhile.
Tom
I've tried many different types, capacities and manufacturers but yet to find one that works. Why MT don't tell us what microSD cards they used for testing?Guys any news on the Micro-SD ? which type of Micro-SD will work ?
Can i know the estimated heat dissipation from the router board? Also, what is the ambient temperatureit is somewhere between on oe switch chips and CPU. That is why i can show temperature like that as it receives heat from Gbit switch, that usually are hot and a cpu.